Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

18027Re: Some Terence Gray also know as Wei-Wu-Wei(with some tweaking)

Expand Messages
  • schatzman
    Nov 8, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      um...huh?

      --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, "tarah513" <faithearden@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      >
      > Jesus Saves...Jesus will save you. If there is no dying, then who will
      > Jesus save? Ye MUST be born again in order to be saved by Jesus. So
      > there is lots of living & dying going on, one just has to apperceive
      > that it is so. The big difference in living & dying, thus, is that Jesus
      > saves you when you die.
      >
      > --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, sandeep chatterjee
      > <sandeep1960@> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > What difference could there be between 'living' and
      > > 'dying'?
      > >
      > > 'Living' is only the elaboration in sequential duration of what
      > > otherwise is known as 'death'.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > When What-we-are apparently functions.....
      > >
      > > ..... extending itself in three apparent spatial
      > > dimensions ......
      > >
      > > .....and invests in it's own creativity, through an interpreting of
      > the extending.... as duration...
      > >
      > > ... thus the as-if appearance of
      > > 'space-time'........ that is what held to be as 'living'.
      > >
      > > When that process
      > > ceases...... we are no longer extended in sequential duration...
      > >
      > > .... we are no
      > > longer elaborated in 'space'...
      > >
      > > ... 'space-time' is no more ..
      > >
      > > ...and the apparent
      > > universe dis-appears.
      > >
      > >
      > > Then we say we are 'dead'.
      > >
      > >
      > > But as what we are we have never 'lived', and cannot 'die'.
      > >
      > > Where could 'we' live?
      > >
      > > When could 'we' die?
      > >
      > >
      > > How could there be such
      > > things as 'we'?
      > >
      > >
      > > 'Living' is a spatial illusion........... 'dying' is a temporal
      > > illusion,
      > >
      > >
      > > 'We' is the sense of a spatio-temporal illusion ........based on the
      > as-if serial
      > > interpretation of dimensional 'stills' or 'quanta' .......cognised as
      > movement.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Only the concepts of infinity and intemporality can suggest
      > > intellectually a notion
      > > of what we are as the source and origin of
      > > appearance or manifestation.
      > >
      >
    • Show all 8 messages in this topic