17864Re: "Right Effort"
- Sep 4, 2011--- In email@example.com, "walto" <calhorn@...> wrote:
>there is no separably existing "you" to hold a view, nor is there any way that sentences being typed can constitute an actual view that can be agreed with or disagreed with.
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "walto" <calhorn@> wrote:
> Maybe I just disagree with you? We could agree to disagree: In fact, each could acknowledge that the other was correct and that his position wasn't necessarily a function of some psychological defect. I'm willing to do that--Are you?
> I didn't put that well. Obviously, neither of us is likely to acknowledge that the other is "correct." I should have said something like "each could acknowledge that the other takes a different view of the matter, but that his position isn't necessarily a function of some psychological defect or incompleteness. I'm willing to do that--Are you?"
> Sorry for any confusion.
as for what this is - one knows this directly - and is clear that words aren't adding to what this is, nor can they diminish it.
sharing words is for fun and enjoyment - but not to establish something ...
what the heck is this, then?
call this clear light, call it being - just don't call it late for dinner ...
- d -
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>