14740Re: [Meditation Society of America] Re: Could this be called a practice?
- Apr 5, 2006El 05/04/2006, a las 8:54, medit8ionsociety escribió:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Maria Luisa"Thanks to you Bob,
> <mlcanow@...> wrote:
> > In my view, all the practices can be reduced to one single practice.
> > At the end, all of them lead to it, if so. Purifications, letting
> > go´s, observation, discrimination, repetitions, being still,
> intents of
> > mindfullness, meditation, being in the now, focussing, and whatever,
> > can be reduced into simple self enquiry, which does not need of much
> > training. It is one step practice. If we can call it so. In any
> > there is no guarantee of it 'functioning', for the needed
> > concetration for this depends on how able one is to be still, let
> > observe, discriminate, concentrate..........:-) or just how tired,
> > exhausted, one is of being the one, one is supposed to be. But let´s
> > see.
> > Thoughts are impermanent for they arise and disappear. The first or
> > most recurrent thought tends to be the thought 'I'. To follow the
> > trade of this thought until reaching the source from where it takes
> > rise would make evident that this thought appears as if from
> > to then disappear into the same place.
> > The biggest cloud in this respect is that we believe that thoughts
> > occur to us. MY thoughts, taking this thinker as "I", which in
> > reality is the root thought. "I" is a thought. First premise, yes,
> > but nobody is ever convinced of this, so that is why it is suggested
> > to investigate the 'place' from where this "I", as a thought,
> > appears. And that´s all that can be done. Only when there is the
> > eagerness to do this investigation, I mean, when one is really tired
> > of being this "I", (of the seeking I) is when self enquiry is in
> > truth done.
> > Realization of the reality of what we are is so simple, so near, so
> > obvious and immediate, but at the same time, we are so used
> > in the tendency) to follow the thoughts and their continuity which
> > generates stories, that it seems rare and difficult to recognize
> > This, (which seems as if no-where, no-place, as if nothing, from
> > which the thought 'I' or any other thought arises), Is what we are.
> > Even to mention this would make a lot of people run away, for almost
> > nobody wants to buy this scary proposition.
> > Now, following the thread
> > (of thoughts :-))
> > being this a tendency (to follow the thoughts), the practice of self
> > enquiry (to follow the trade of the thought 'I') is a direct and
> > efficient way to cut such tendency from its root. Which, as well as
> > can try to express, does not mean that no more thoughts will ever
> > appear, but that their appearances will be known or recognized as
> > what they are: just appearances in that (which I really am) , this
> > name something or nothing which some call present awareness, others
> > name it nothingness and some others call it consciousness or void (a
> > non fashionable way would be God) and the way I use to express it
> > 'existence from ever and for ever'.
> > (I seem to be mentioning a 'way' here, which also seems to be out of
> > fashion, but I will dare to continue with this.)
> > If we can call this a practice, between the so called purifying
> > practices for a 'mind to be ready for enlightenment' or to 'deserve
> > the Grace', as some seekers use to place, this would be an effective
> > one. Ramana Maharshi said about self enquiry that it was the
> > and the goal. But then again, everybody wants something better than
> > what they have (are) now, so there is always something missing,
> > is missing, the right moment has not come yet, and so on.
> > The purification that so many practices called 'spiritual' seek, is
> > in reality, as I have understood, the cutting of the road we are
> > to follow, this means, to make a very strong STOP in the current of
> > thoughts that tend to arise, and to pay attention to that or this,
> > which is as if from no where, as if from nothing, that from where
> > this same attention arise and disappears. Not being attention
> > directed to any other thought in this instant, attention disappears
> > in its own source. (Well, at least I am trying to explain how I
> > it may happen, though it may not happen this way) All there is,
> > is what always is in this very instant from ever and for ever. Any
> > other instant (before or after) is just another thought happening in
> > this instant.
> > These are my ideas about the 'way'. But trully, trully, what I am
> > sure is that there is no way, only what happens in this instant
> > (for me) could be expressed as 'existence from ever and for ever'.
> > So, a way to get where? Nowhere, only the possible recognition of
> > nature of this ever present reality is what may happen in this
> > Maria Luisa
> Dear Maria Luisa,
> It is said that Realization of "IT" happens
> only by Grace. But there seems to be preceeding
> events that prepare one for "THIS". Like when
> soil is cleared of weeds and made ready for
> the seed to be able to grow and come into full
> bloom. I (whoever that is:-)) think that this
> post is just such an enrichment of our inner
> soil. And most certainly a Grace itself. Thanks!
> Peace and blessings,
The real joy of all this 'writing about what is becoming clear' is
the resonance that is found within others, when it happens. All this
is done, just for the joy of it, no other reason, I suppose (because
reason is something that has nothing to do with all this we are
trying to understand, isn´t it?) And, not trying to be repetitive or
boring, but reality is that resonance (for me) is the manifestation
of the indivisible unity of existence .......... joyfully.
Love and peace,
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>