Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

14734Re: Could this be called a practice?

Expand Messages
  • medit8ionsociety
    Apr 5, 2006
      --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, "Maria Luisa"
      <mlcanow@...> wrote:
      > In my view, all the practices can be reduced to one single practice.
      > At the end, all of them lead to it, if so. Purifications, letting
      > go´s, observation, discrimination, repetitions, being still,
      intents of
      > mindfullness, meditation, being in the now, focussing, and whatever,
      > can be reduced into simple self enquiry, which does not need of much
      > training. It is one step practice. If we can call it so. In any
      > there is no guarantee of it 'functioning', for the needed
      > concetration for this depends on how able one is to be still, let
      > observe, discriminate, concentrate..........:-) or just how tired,
      > exhausted, one is of being the one, one is supposed to be. But let´s
      > see.
      > Thoughts are impermanent for they arise and disappear. The first or
      > most recurrent thought tends to be the thought 'I'. To follow the
      > trade of this thought until reaching the source from where it takes
      > rise would make evident that this thought appears as if from
      > to then disappear into the same place.
      > The biggest cloud in this respect is that we believe that thoughts
      > occur to us. MY thoughts, taking this thinker as "I", which in
      > reality is the root thought. "I" is a thought. First premise, yes,
      > but nobody is ever convinced of this, so that is why it is suggested
      > to investigate the 'place' from where this "I", as a thought,
      > appears. And that´s all that can be done. Only when there is the
      > eagerness to do this investigation, I mean, when one is really tired
      > of being this "I", (of the seeking I) is when self enquiry is in
      > truth done.
      > Realization of the reality of what we are is so simple, so near, so
      > obvious and immediate, but at the same time, we are so used
      > in the tendency) to follow the thoughts and their continuity which
      > generates stories, that it seems rare and difficult to recognize
      > This, (which seems as if no-where, no-place, as if nothing, from
      > which the thought 'I' or any other thought arises), Is what we are.
      > Even to mention this would make a lot of people run away, for almost
      > nobody wants to buy this scary proposition.
      > Now, following the thread
      > (of thoughts :-))
      > being this a tendency (to follow the thoughts), the practice of self
      > enquiry (to follow the trade of the thought 'I') is a direct and
      > efficient way to cut such tendency from its root. Which, as well as
      > can try to express, does not mean that no more thoughts will ever
      > appear, but that their appearances will be known or recognized as
      > what they are: just appearances in that (which I really am) , this
      > name something or nothing which some call present awareness, others
      > name it nothingness and some others call it consciousness or void (a
      > non fashionable way would be God) and the way I use to express it
      > 'existence from ever and for ever'.
      > (I seem to be mentioning a 'way' here, which also seems to be out of
      > fashion, but I will dare to continue with this.)
      > If we can call this a practice, between the so called purifying
      > practices for a 'mind to be ready for enlightenment' or to 'deserve
      > the Grace', as some seekers use to place, this would be an effective
      > one. Ramana Maharshi said about self enquiry that it was the
      > and the goal. But then again, everybody wants something better than
      > what they have (are) now, so there is always something missing,
      > is missing, the right moment has not come yet, and so on.
      > The purification that so many practices called 'spiritual' seek, is
      > in reality, as I have understood, the cutting of the road we are
      > to follow, this means, to make a very strong STOP in the current of
      > thoughts that tend to arise, and to pay attention to that or this,
      > which is as if from no where, as if from nothing, that from where
      > this same attention arise and disappears. Not being attention
      > directed to any other thought in this instant, attention disappears
      > in its own source. (Well, at least I am trying to explain how I
      > it may happen, though it may not happen this way) All there is,
      > is what always is in this very instant from ever and for ever. Any
      > other instant (before or after) is just another thought happening in
      > this instant.
      > These are my ideas about the 'way'. But trully, trully, what I am
      > sure is that there is no way, only what happens in this instant
      > (for me) could be expressed as 'existence from ever and for ever'.
      > So, a way to get where? Nowhere, only the possible recognition of
      > nature of this ever present reality is what may happen in this
      > Maria Luisa
      Dear Maria Luisa,
      It is said that Realization of "IT" happens
      only by Grace. But there seems to be preceeding
      events that prepare one for "THIS". Like when
      soil is cleared of weeds and made ready for
      the seed to be able to grow and come into full
      bloom. I (whoever that is:-)) think that this
      post is just such an enrichment of our inner
      soil. And most certainly a Grace itself. Thanks!
      Peace and blessings,
    • Show all 13 messages in this topic