Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

12952Re: truth

Expand Messages
  • texasbg2000
    Jun 9, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, medit8ionsociety
      <no_reply@y...> wrote:
      > --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, "texasbg2000"
      > <Bigbobgraham@a...> wrote:
      > > If the truth is defined as that which does not change, then how
      can
      > a
      > > thought be considered the truth.
      > >
      > > Misconception and accurate cognition are better designations for
      > > thoughts. Accurate cognition is referred to as the truth. What
      is
      > > wrong with that?
      > >
      > > Is it really so profound to confound the two meanings of the
      > > word 'truth', and call that the truth?
      > >
      > > Moralists consistantly use this confusion to justify their own
      > > misconceptions, and blind the reason of others.
      > >
      > > love
      > > Bobby G.
      >
      > Yo Sri Bobby G,
      > Actually, the initial statement..."The truth is...there is no Truth.
      > And that's the Truth!" seems to be a semi-typical Sufi device that
      > presents both sides of a concept in a way that negates the validity
      > of either view. This presents the opportunity to cease further
      mental
      > chattering about the subject, and opens the door to the possibility
      > of direct experience of the subject/concept that words, be they
      ones
      > of "Truth" or of "Untruth", can only point to.
      > And that may or may not be the Truth:-)
      > Peace and blessings,
      > Bob

      just chattering Bob.

      The old message board is a little dry these days.

      If there is no justice there is no need for truth. That is probably
      not true. Or is it?

      Love
      Bobby G.
    • Show all 9 messages in this topic