- Jun 9, 2004--- In email@example.com, "texasbg2000"
> If the truth is defined as that which does not change, then how cana
> thought be considered the truth.Yo Sri Bobby G,
> Misconception and accurate cognition are better designations for
> thoughts. Accurate cognition is referred to as the truth. What is
> wrong with that?
> Is it really so profound to confound the two meanings of the
> word 'truth', and call that the truth?
> Moralists consistantly use this confusion to justify their own
> misconceptions, and blind the reason of others.
> Bobby G.
Actually, the initial statement..."The truth is...there is no Truth.
And that's the Truth!" seems to be a semi-typical Sufi device that
presents both sides of a concept in a way that negates the validity
of either view. This presents the opportunity to cease further mental
chattering about the subject, and opens the door to the possibility
of direct experience of the subject/concept that words, be they ones
of "Truth" or of "Untruth", can only point to.
And that may or may not be the Truth:-)
Peace and blessings,
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>