1167More on "lying shame"
- Oct 1, 2002In a message dated 10/1/2002 9:51:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Tony" <
>Words that have well-defined and well-known acceptable meanings (in this case
> I could not quite understand your post. Could you explain it for me please?
"energy") are misused to apply to things that they really don't, and people
extrapolate from known characteristics of the item identified ("energy") to
prognosticate unobserved phenomena that just don't happen. Instead of
communicating the person misusing the term spreads confusion or disbelief.
Such misuse has been used by skeptics in many arena as proof of nonexistence
of the original phenomena when there postulated characteristics can not be
Personally, I would much rather that a new word be used that didn't have the
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Next post in topic >>