Sealing eating vessels - Pictures at last... :-)
- Thanks all for your input and helpfulness when I brought up the subject of "Food-safe" finishings just before Pensic.
I have now made 8 platters/plates, using a variety of different methods (from fully manual with a gouge ("Owww, my sore hands, shoulders etc"), through fully routed (not so pretty) to a combination of angle-grinder, gouge and sandpaper).
Here is a link to my lady-wife's flickr page with some pics of the first batch of finished items.
The size is 260mm x 150mm x 19mm (10.25" x 6" x .75"), depth in these is about 8mm (3/8").
These are finished with Organoil Woodwipe (Tung oil + orange).
My second set are Bees-waxed and then finished with Woodwipe, and had MUCH finer sides/base (sides about 6mm (1/4"), and base about 3mm (1/8"), these feel much nicer in the hand...
CrispinOn 27/07/07, Sevarian/Crispin <sca.sevarian@...> wrote:
I shall have to concentrate on finishing the first one so I can get something up for my "adoring masses" <grin>.
I managed to get Tung Oil yesterday, as well as a Citrus/Tung oil preparation called Organoil (www.organoil.com.au) WoodwipeOn 27/07/07, slarm1 <slarm1@...> wrote:
As many have suggested, Tung oil is a great finish, just make sure it
is pure tung oil. Some "tung oil finishes" are actually tung oil based
varnishes thinned down with mineral spirits. I hope to see some of
your work pics soon also. Stephan von Hesse
"Well, you know... most Catholics are so boring, you kind of expect them to be fairly reasonable and not, say, frothing papal fanboys with the IQ of a turnip. So he had me fooled. Not any more, though."
Thanks to Eric The FruitBat (etfb.livejournal.com)
- Iain,I am with both you and Brian Broadaxe, I detest "People's Choice" because it rarely goes to the best item, but often it goes to the fanciest scroll or most glitzy Tudor dress or spiffy looking armour.I also understand Brian's frustration with documentation being too much of the total. I was the author of the current system of judging criteria that Drachenwald uses. Documentation and Workmanship are each 30% of the total (making 60% from these two), with 20% being Authenticity, 10% for Complexity, and the final 10% for overall Aesthetic value.So, a well executed item using authentic materials, tools, and techniques, should always outscore a poorly made item, especially a poorly made one that is done with modern tools, techniques, and materials.Depending on the location of the display, the people's choice may be a little better but that will only be an event where A&S is the focus and the majority of folks understand the difficulties of well made items. You can certainly educate folks, but it takes time.cheers,Terafan
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of i_odlin
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 1:46 PM
Subject: [MedievalSawdust] Re: Period Methods & A & S Judging
Colin "AlbionWood" wrote:
>If you really must have some competitiveaspect, you could allow
>"people's choice" awards or thelike.
Perhaps I'm alone in this, but I dislike "People's Choice"
competitions even more than the run-of-the-mill A&S display.
One could more honestly call them "OOH, SHINY!" competitions,
as the winner is invariably the most gaudy item present, no
matter how well made or well researched anything else is.
Hand-stitched that perfect 'St Louis' shirt from linen you wove
(on a loom you built) from flax you grew, harvested and processed
yourself? Whatever! The winner is: This machine-stitched wench
outfit in colourful acetate velvet that a child went nuts on with
a 'Bedazzler' kit! Yay!