- Hey, gang.
I'm new, first post, glad to be here. I've been involved in the SCA for about 15
years, usually as a performer, recently as a clothing enthusiast and Rapier
student. I've meandered all about the arts scene and have found my interests
are far too widely cast to be reasonable for real life. In other words, I often get
too many irons in the fire.
One thing that has stayed with me is my interest in improving my camp
furniture. This led to basic woodworking, which led to woodturning, which led
to finishes, etc. Sound familiar?
Now that I have access to some amazing tools and information, I find myself
wanting to get as period as possible. Which leads to this question...
Is furniture usually stained due to our modern love of woodgrain, or out of
ignorance for the accepted medieval practice of painting? Do some of you
know exactly how you would paint a piece but find you haven't the heart to
paint it? Are some of you staining to achieve the timeworn look of unfinished
wood that was seen in the middle ages? Those of you who do paint your
work, what do you use, milk paint or egg tempera?
These seem to be the ones most folks agree as being closest to accurate,
and they seem to be more durable and faithful in texture and color. Has
anyone ever used gilt varnish on a piece, or gold leaf?
Painters and gilters, got any pictures?
Would there be a general outcry from modern observers if we, striving for
authenticity, began to paint more often? Should we strive to do so in an
attempt to educate?
Thanks, everyone. Look forward to hearing your views.
>Even if its just criteria for this list, it
> Hmmm... not sure I see the benefit of a single set
> of criteria. But go
> ahead and discuss the benefits as you see them... I
> might be able to be
> convinced :)
at least lets us have a way to standardise
the way an item would be judged.
Baron Conal O'hAirt / Jim Hart
Aude Aliquid Dignum
' Dare Something Worthy '
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!