Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [MedievalSawdust] "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme

Expand Messages
  • Bill McNutt
    Undermines and minimizes what the real Nazi s did, too. Will From: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com [mailto:medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
    Message 1 of 26 , May 3, 2009
    • 0 Attachment

      Undermines and minimizes what the real Nazi’s did, too.

       

      Will

       

      From: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com [mailto:medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnson
      Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 7:59 AM
      To: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [MedievalSawdust] "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme

       




      I wish people would refrain from casually throwing out the term "Authenticity Nazi". It's highly offensive for anyone to be compared to mass-murdering fascists.

    • Jeff Johnson
      James, I don t know that there is a proper application, other than as a derogatory personal attack, disguised as an attack or grudgewank on Teh Evil
      Message 2 of 26 , May 3, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        James,

        I don't know that there is a "proper" application, other than as a derogatory personal attack, disguised as an attack or grudgewank on "Teh Evil Oppressors".

        My point wasn't to ask for the group owner to apply the powers of moderation, but for the participants on an open forum to apply self-moderation and refrain from using a term that is offensive, and as Bill points out, trivializes the actions of nazi regime by equating them to a few snarky jerks.

        Jeff/Geoff

        --- In medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com, James Barker <flonzy@...> wrote:
        >
        >
        > My biggest problem with the term is it is almost never used in a proper way. So often it is not reserved for people who are trying to control anything but is used on persons interested in historical knowledge. I have had the old a/n label tossed at me in other forums in the past only for making a post about how something was done historicaly.
        >
        >
        >
        > I often find the people who use the a/n label themselves are the problem. They are offended by the suggestion they are not doing something right; like it is a moral issue. There is no morality in historical reconstruction only facts and attempts to reconstruct.
        >
        > James
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > To: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com
        > From: baronconal@...
        > Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:53:43 -0700
        > Subject: [MedievalSawdust] future use Of authenticity-nazi
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > As long as we are not making specific attacks on a named individual
        > I do not have a problem with a term like lower case authenticity-nazi
        > under some circumstances.
        >
        > ( a definition found online )
        > 3. a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to control a specified
        > activity, practice, etc.: a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; tobacco
        > nazis trying to ban smoking.
        >
        > Until the SCA adopts a term that means the same thing that everyone
        > understands.... we are probably gonna have to live with this.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > We all know what is actually meant by that term and no one can claim that they feel
        > that that term has any direct connection to the German Nazi party of WWII
        > or is meant to imply that you ( a generalized non-specific 'you' ) agree with those beliefs.
        >
        > Does anyone believe that Fred Flinstone was homosexual because the word 'gay' is in the
        > Flinstone's theme song....? ( not trying to be funny, just trying to make a point. )
        > One definition of a word does not remove all other possible definitions from use.
        >
        > I will ask that given it's possible misinterpretations, that we please try to use another
        > term where possible. There are times when a word of less weight can be applied.
        > Authenticity-nazi should be used for the the most extreme examples of the mindset
        > of "If it is not period, it is not welcome in my presence" or "If it is not period you are
        > wasting your time doing it and it should not be allowed in the SCA."
        >
        > Directly insulting a named individual I will not allow.
        >
        > Disagreeing with that individual in an articulate manner while explaining
        > why you disagree is OK, but remember that we lose inflection with this
        > form of communication. So please be careful while disagreeing. We are
        > all supposed to be friends here.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > Terms like doodyhead are allowed because I do not think anyone can believe
        > that it can ever be meant seriously under any circumstances.
        >
        > Baron Conal O'hAirt / Jim Hart
        >
        > Aude Aliquid Dignum
        > ' Dare Something Worthy '
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > From: quailriver <quailriver@...>
        > To: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com
        > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2009 10:12:56 AM
        > Subject: [MedievalSawdust] Re: "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme
        >
        >
        >
        > Perhaps it's time for the moderator to step in on this one and make the call.
        > Regards,
        > Larry C.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > _________________________________________________________________
        > Hotmail� has a new way to see what's up with your friends.
        > http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/WhatsNew?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_WhatsNew1_052009
        >
      • cuvien1438
        Come on folk, Really! Lord Wilson is right in this matter. Perhaps a bit too polite to say you are all being silly on this point. I m new, o.k., so I don t
        Message 3 of 26 , May 3, 2009
        • 0 Attachment
          Come on folk,

          Really!


          Lord Wilson is right in this matter. Perhaps a bit too polite to say you are all being silly on this point.

          I'm new, o.k., so I don't carry any of the baggage many of you must. So, for whatever it's worth. My opinion is simply that the term is meant for most as a way of describing someone who is not just period, but is so enamored with accuracy that they miss the more important point of having FUN.

          It's nothing more complicated than that. At least not for me. And I might even Hit The Shift Button When I Type The Word Nazi. If that's too much for some of you then perhaps something drastic should be done. Maybe pitchforks or torches, or maybe pitchforks AND torches! That's period isn't it?

          Sincerely,

          C.

          P.S. Maybe you folk should have been warning me that I can't finish a tenon with a chisel. If you had, maybe I wouldn't have a bed rail with a tenon that is all "nazi-ed" up!

          Thanks.
        • leaking pen
          The Nazi party was a world wide fascist movement that favored strong govermental control of society, and a very stringent moral requirement that people follow.
          Message 4 of 26 , May 3, 2009
          • 0 Attachment
            The Nazi party was a world wide fascist movement that favored strong
            govermental control of society, and a very stringent moral requirement
            that people follow. There was a very large Nazi party here in the us.
            Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
            to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
            regard. ONE BRANCH of the Nazi Party, the one in Germany that elected
            Adolph Hitler as their party candidate to the German presidential
            election, which he then won, then went largely anti-semetic and went
            on a rampage throughout Europe, which pretty much killed the party, in
            name at least, else where in the world. But teh word Nazi was used to
            mean , for lack of a better term, anal about something, long before
            world war 2. it is NOT a comparison to Hitler or anti-semetism, but to
            FASCISM, which, in this case, isn't too far off. Very stringent rules,
            forced following of the most stringent application of the rules, no
            exceptions? sounds about right.

            On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Johnson <jljonsn@...> wrote:
            >
            >
            > I wish people would refrain from casually throwing out the term
            > "Authenticity Nazi". It's highly offensive for anyone to be compared to
            > mass-murdering fascists.
            >
            >
          • James Winkler
            ... extremism, by any name, is still extremism. Tolerance is the only antidote. Chas.
            Message 5 of 26 , May 3, 2009
            • 0 Attachment
              ... extremism, by any name, is still extremism.  Tolerance is the only antidote.
               
              Chas.
               
            • quailriver
              ... Wow, that remark is really sickly twisted!
              Message 6 of 26 , May 3, 2009
              • 0 Attachment
                >Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
                >to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
                >regard.

                Wow, that remark is really sickly twisted!





                --- In medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com, leaking pen <itsatrap@...> wrote:
                >
                > The Nazi party was a world wide fascist movement that favored strong
                > govermental control of society, and a very stringent moral requirement
                > that people follow. There was a very large Nazi party here in the us.
                > Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
                > to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
                > regard. ONE BRANCH of the Nazi Party, the one in Germany that elected
                > Adolph Hitler as their party candidate to the German presidential
                > election, which he then won, then went largely anti-semetic and went
                > on a rampage throughout Europe, which pretty much killed the party, in
                > name at least, else where in the world. But teh word Nazi was used to
                > mean , for lack of a better term, anal about something, long before
                > world war 2. it is NOT a comparison to Hitler or anti-semetism, but to
                > FASCISM, which, in this case, isn't too far off. Very stringent rules,
                > forced following of the most stringent application of the rules, no
                > exceptions? sounds about right.
                >
                > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Johnson <jljonsn@...> wrote:
                > >
                > >
                > > I wish people would refrain from casually throwing out the term
                > > "Authenticity Nazi". It's highly offensive for anyone to be compared to
                > > mass-murdering fascists.
                > >
                > >
                >
              • leaking pen
                What? Both groups believe in a very strong moral code, with laws that match, and a heavily governed and controled social situation. I was not trying to be
                Message 7 of 26 , May 3, 2009
                • 0 Attachment
                  What? Both groups believe in a very strong moral code, with laws that
                  match, and a heavily governed and controled social situation. I was
                  not trying to be insulting, but merely give a modern comparison to
                  that segment of the philosophy of the Nazi party. If we were talking
                  about social welfare, I'd point out that the Nazi parties views on
                  such were very similar to the current Democratic party, in that they
                  believed in a "safety net" for those too old or infirm to work, and
                  several minimums of standard including a minimum wage and profit caps
                  on industries.

                  On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 11:29 PM, quailriver <quailriver@...> wrote:
                  >
                  >
                  >>Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
                  >>to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
                  >>regard.
                  >
                  > Wow, that remark is really sickly twisted!
                  >
                  > --- In medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com, leaking pen <itsatrap@...> wrote:
                  >>
                  >> The Nazi party was a world wide fascist movement that favored strong
                  >> govermental control of society, and a very stringent moral requirement
                  >> that people follow. There was a very large Nazi party here in the us.
                  >> Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
                  >> to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
                  >> regard. ONE BRANCH of the Nazi Party, the one in Germany that elected
                  >> Adolph Hitler as their party candidate to the German presidential
                  >> election, which he then won, then went largely anti-semetic and went
                  >> on a rampage throughout Europe, which pretty much killed the party, in
                  >> name at least, else where in the world. But teh word Nazi was used to
                  >> mean , for lack of a better term, anal about something, long before
                  >> world war 2. it is NOT a comparison to Hitler or anti-semetism, but to
                  >> FASCISM, which, in this case, isn't too far off. Very stringent rules,
                  >> forced following of the most stringent application of the rules, no
                  >> exceptions? sounds about right.
                  >>
                  >> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Johnson <jljonsn@...> wrote:
                  >> >
                  >> >
                  >> > I wish people would refrain from casually throwing out the term
                  >> > "Authenticity Nazi". It's highly offensive for anyone to be compared to
                  >> > mass-murdering fascists.
                  >> >
                  >> >
                  >>
                  >
                  >
                • Dianne
                  ... extremism, by any name, is still extremism. Tolerance is the only antidote. Chas. That runs both ways, though. A lot of people who work very hard at
                  Message 8 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                  • 0 Attachment
                    ... extremism, by any name, is still extremism.  Tolerance is the only antidote.
                     
                    Chas.>>
                     
                    That runs both ways, though. A lot of people who work very hard at accuracy are accused of spoiling the fun for those who are coming for the beer and the party.
                     
                    I'm trying very hard to improve the accuracy of my dress and camp. (And I have a very long way to go yet.) If you ASK me what fabrics you should use for your garb. I'm going to recommend wool and linen. If you ASK me what kind of tent you should buy, I'm going to recommend a pavilion.
                    Not only are they the more accurate choice, they're by far the more comfortable choice.
                     
                    Unless you ask me, though, I'm far too busy working on improving my own impression to have time to worry about yours!
                     
                    Laurensa

                  • avery1415@sbcglobal.net
                    At one level, I agree. On another level, well, I once got to deal with a guy who explained for the whole wide internet to read, that anybody who would (make a
                    Message 9 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                    • 0 Attachment
                      At one level, I agree.

                      On another level, well, I once got to deal with a guy who explained for the whole wide internet to read, that anybody who would (make a not terribly radical substitution to make their SCA project more durable) was "subhuman". (I wish I was making this up.) No, he hadn't grabbed the bronze ring of fascism and murdered 12 million people, but I wouldn't leave him alone in a room with a pair of jack boots for more than a few minutes.

                      Avery
                    • Hester, Gene
                      Well said. Dante ... From: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com To: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com
                      Message 10 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                      • 0 Attachment
                        Re: [MedievalSawdust] "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme

                        Well said.
                        Dante

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com <medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com>
                        To: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com <medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com>
                        Sent: Mon May 04 04:10:26 2009
                        Subject: Re: [MedievalSawdust] "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme



                        ... extremism, by any name, is still extremism.  Tolerance is the only antidote.

                        Chas.>>

                        That runs both ways, though. A lot of people who work very hard at accuracy are accused of spoiling the fun for those who are coming for the beer and the party.

                        I'm trying very hard to improve the accuracy of my dress and camp. (And I have a very long way to go yet.) If you ASK me what fabrics you should use for your garb. I'm going to recommend wool and linen. If you ASK me what kind of tent you should buy, I'm going to recommend a pavilion.
                        Not only are they the more accurate choice, they're by far the more comfortable choice.

                        Unless you ask me, though, I'm far too busy working on improving my own impression to have time to worry about yours!

                        Laurensa



                      • James Barker
                        WTF does your post have to do with this topic? Beyond that I find it funny that you would say the right is somehow more controlling than the left. The left
                        Message 11 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                        • 0 Attachment
                          WTF does your post have to do with this topic?
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                          Beyond that I find it funny that you would say the right is somehow more controlling than the left. The left invented politically correct speech (control what you say), they try to control the media (propaganda disguised as real reporting unlike right talk show hosts), they attack the opposition as being unintelligent, they support eugenics, the Nazis were pro union and worker as the left is, and they want socialistic politics.
                           
                          However neither our right or left sides in America are a damn thing like Nazis which is why they are their own category of political thinking.

                          So lets move on
                          James
                           
                           
                           


                           
                          > To: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com
                          > From: itsatrap@...
                          > Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 21:36:29 -0700
                          > Subject: Re: [MedievalSawdust] "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme
                          >
                          > The Nazi party was a world wide fascist movement that favored strong
                          > govermental control of society, and a very stringent moral requirement
                          > that people follow. There was a very large Nazi party here in the us.
                          > Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
                          > to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
                          > regard. ONE BRANCH of the Nazi Party, the one in Germany that elected
                          > Adolph Hitler as their party candidate to the German presidential
                          > election, which he then won, then went largely anti-semetic and went
                          > on a rampage throughout Europe, which pretty much killed the party, in
                          > name at least, else where in the world. But teh word Nazi was used to
                          > mean , for lack of a better term, anal about something, long before
                          > world war 2. it is NOT a comparison to Hitler or anti-semetism, but to
                          > FASCISM, which, in this case, isn't too far off. Very stringent rules,
                          > forced following of the most stringent application of the rules, no
                          > exceptions? sounds about right.
                          >
                          > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Johnson <jljonsn@...> wrote:
                          > >
                          > >
                          > > I wish people would refrain from casually throwing out the term
                          > > "Authenticity Nazi". It's highly offensive for anyone to be compared to
                          > > mass-murdering fascists.
                          > >
                          > >
                          >
                          >
                          > ------------------------------------
                          >
                          > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
                          > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/medievalsawdust/Yahoo! Groups Links
                          >
                          > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
                          > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/medievalsawdust/
                          >
                          > <*> Your email settings:
                          > Individual Email | Traditional
                          >
                          > <*> To change settings online go to:
                          > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/medievalsawdust/join
                          > (Yahoo! ID required)
                          >
                          > <*> To change settings via email:
                          > mailto:medievalsawdust-digest@yahoogroups.com
                          > mailto:medievalsawdust-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
                          >
                          > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                          > medievalsawdust-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                          >
                          > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
                          > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                          >


                          Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
                        • Barbara
                          Let me say that I believe anyone truly criticizing someone for not being authentic enough is a jerk. And I think that s the best word for them. However, I
                          Message 12 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                          • 0 Attachment
                            Let me say that I believe anyone truly criticizing someone for not being
                            authentic enough is a jerk. And I think that's the best word for them.

                            However, I would like to point out that being authentic IS fun. I really
                            get upset when people equate 'authentic' with 'not fun.' If it's not your
                            thing, that's fine. Just like if you're not into fighting or weaving or
                            whatever. But don't assume we are not having fun when we try to be as
                            authentic as we can.

                            I only apply my standards to myself, yet I've been called a "nazi" simply
                            for trying to be authentic. Those folks are jerks too. ;-)

                            Mir!
                            Tatjana
                            "It's never too late to be what you might have been."


                            Wolf and Tiger Woodworking
                            http://www.wolfandtiger.com

                            ----- Original Message -----
                            From: "cuvien1438" <cuvien1438@...>
                            To: <medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com>
                            Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 10:36 PM
                            Subject: [MedievalSawdust] Re: "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme


                            > Come on folk,
                            >
                            > Really!
                            >
                            >
                            > Lord Wilson is right in this matter. Perhaps a bit too polite to say you
                            > are all being silly on this point.
                            >
                            > I'm new, o.k., so I don't carry any of the baggage many of you must. So,
                            > for whatever it's worth. My opinion is simply that the term is meant for
                            > most as a way of describing someone who is not just period, but is so
                            > enamored with accuracy that they miss the more important point of having
                            > FUN.
                            >
                            > It's nothing more complicated than that. At least not for me. And I might
                            > even Hit The Shift Button When I Type The Word Nazi. If that's too much
                            > for some of you then perhaps something drastic should be done. Maybe
                            > pitchforks or torches, or maybe pitchforks AND torches! That's period
                            > isn't it?
                            >
                            > Sincerely,
                            >
                            > C.
                          • Rebekah
                            I m done. Now I look for the door. RdA
                            Message 13 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                            • 0 Attachment
                              I'm done. Now I look for the door.
                               
                              RdA
                            • Beau or Steve
                              Haven t we beaten this horse to death by now? Let s return to our regularly scheduled program. Stefan
                              Message 14 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                              • 0 Attachment
                                Haven't we beaten this horse to death by now? Let's return to our regularly
                                scheduled program.

                                Stefan
                              • leaking pen
                                The problem that is being discussed is with people who tell other people that they aren t being authentic enough. Its an attitude that comes across similar
                                Message 15 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                                • 0 Attachment
                                  The problem that is being discussed is with people who tell other
                                  people that they aren't being authentic enough. Its an attitude that
                                  comes across similar to, ohh, you aren't a "REAL" SCA woodworker
                                  unless you blah. Its an arrogance that if something isn't exactly
                                  right, and can't be documented as "the ways it was" then its
                                  worthless for all purposes. THAT's the attitude under discussion.
                                  I'm thankfull that very few people actually seem to have this
                                  attitude, most are just like you and me in that we enjoy being
                                  authentic as possible for the challenge, for the science, for the
                                  research and learning. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the few
                                  extremists tend to be very very loud and vocal.

                                  On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Barbara <tiger@...> wrote:
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > Let me say that I believe anyone truly criticizing someone for not being
                                  > authentic enough is a jerk. And I think that's the best word for them.
                                  >
                                  > However, I would like to point out that being authentic IS fun. I really
                                  > get upset when people equate 'authentic' with 'not fun.' If it's not your
                                  > thing, that's fine. Just like if you're not into fighting or weaving or
                                  > whatever. But don't assume we are not having fun when we try to be as
                                  > authentic as we can.
                                  >
                                  > I only apply my standards to myself, yet I've been called a "nazi" simply
                                  > for trying to be authentic. Those folks are jerks too. ;-)
                                  >
                                  > Mir!
                                  > Tatjana
                                  > "It's never too late to be what you might have been."
                                  >
                                  > Wolf and Tiger Woodworking
                                  > http://www.wolfandtiger.com
                                  >
                                  > ----- Original Message -----
                                  > From: "cuvien1438" <cuvien1438@...>
                                  > To: <medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com>
                                  > Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 10:36 PM
                                  > Subject: [MedievalSawdust] Re: "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme
                                  >
                                  >> Come on folk,
                                  >>
                                  >> Really!
                                  >>
                                  >>
                                  >> Lord Wilson is right in this matter. Perhaps a bit too polite to say you
                                  >> are all being silly on this point.
                                  >>
                                  >> I'm new, o.k., so I don't carry any of the baggage many of you must. So,
                                  >> for whatever it's worth. My opinion is simply that the term is meant for
                                  >> most as a way of describing someone who is not just period, but is so
                                  >> enamored with accuracy that they miss the more important point of having
                                  >> FUN.
                                  >>
                                  >> It's nothing more complicated than that. At least not for me. And I might
                                  >> even Hit The Shift Button When I Type The Word Nazi. If that's too much
                                  >> for some of you then perhaps something drastic should be done. Maybe
                                  >> pitchforks or torches, or maybe pitchforks AND torches! That's period
                                  >> isn't it?
                                  >>
                                  >> Sincerely,
                                  >>
                                  >> C.
                                  >
                                  >
                                • Conal O'hAirt Jim Hart
                                  Yeah, I think we have gone as far with this as we need to and maybe a little too far. Let s agree to disagree and move on. please do not force me to take
                                  Message 16 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                                  • 0 Attachment
                                    Yeah, I think we have gone as far with this as we need to and
                                    maybe a little too far.

                                    Let's agree to disagree and move on.


                                    please do not force me to take stronger action, we have been a
                                    very civil group and I'd like it to stay that way.
                                     
                                    Baron Conal O'hAirt / Jim Hart

                                    Aude Aliquid Dignum
                                    ' Dare Something Worthy '



                                    From: Beau or Steve <wander7@...>
                                    To: medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com
                                    Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 10:33:54 AM
                                    Subject: Re: [MedievalSawdust] Re: "Nazi" - Insulting in the extreme

                                    Haven't we beaten this horse to death by now? Let's return to our regularly
                                    scheduled program.

                                    Stefan


                                  • conradh@efn.org
                                    And even setting current political jabs aside, long before the German Nazi Party got around to truly notorious stuff like running murder factories and starting
                                    Message 17 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                                    • 0 Attachment
                                      And even setting current political jabs aside, long before the German Nazi
                                      Party got around to truly notorious stuff like running murder factories
                                      and starting World War II, it was already well known for being into
                                      intolerance, sucking up to authority, abusing authority they happen to
                                      have themselves, dress codes, elaborate rules and general bad boundaries.
                                      The people (myself definitely included) who find the "Authenticity Nazi"
                                      label appropriate for a certain sort of reinactor have these vices in
                                      mind, not anti-Semitism or militarism.

                                      The "bad boundaries" issue is central here. If you have high standards of
                                      authenticity _for yourself_ there is nothing to criticize and much to
                                      admire, IMHO. Whether this comes from perfectionism, artistic motives,
                                      curiousity or serious experimental archaeology, it's all good.

                                      Where the bad boundaries come in is when people forget that other people
                                      have different motives. The person who really believes that "this really
                                      upsets _me_, so _you_ have to stop doing it right now!" is being utterly
                                      selfish in a way they usually don't even recognize as such.

                                      There's nothing wrong with having your own standards. There's nothing
                                      wrong with using those standards to judge other people, or artifacts,
                                      either. But there's a million miles of difference between having
                                      standards and thinking that having standards gives you the right to push
                                      other people around.

                                      Ulfhedinn





                                      On Sun, May 3, 2009 11:37 pm, leaking pen wrote:
                                      > What? Both groups believe in a very strong moral code, with laws that
                                      > match, and a heavily governed and controled social situation. I was not
                                      > trying to be insulting, but merely give a modern comparison to that
                                      > segment of the philosophy of the Nazi party. If we were talking about
                                      > social welfare, I'd point out that the Nazi parties views on such were
                                      > very similar to the current Democratic party, in that they believed in a
                                      > "safety net" for those too old or infirm to work, and
                                      > several minimums of standard including a minimum wage and profit caps on
                                      > industries.
                                      >
                                      > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 11:29 PM, quailriver <quailriver@...> wrote:
                                      >
                                      >>
                                      >>
                                      >>> Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
                                      >>> to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
                                      >>> regard.
                                      >>
                                      >> Wow, that remark is really sickly twisted!
                                      >>
                                      >>
                                      >> --- In medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com, leaking pen <itsatrap@...>
                                      >> wrote:
                                      >>
                                      >>>
                                      >>> The Nazi party was a world wide fascist movement that favored strong
                                      >>> govermental control of society, and a very stringent moral requirement
                                      >>> that people follow. There was a very large Nazi party here in the
                                      >>> us. Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very
                                      >>> similar to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in
                                      >>> that regard. ONE BRANCH of the Nazi Party, the one in Germany that
                                      >>> elected Adolph Hitler as their party candidate to the German
                                      >>> presidential election, which he then won, then went largely
                                      >>> anti-semetic and went on a rampage throughout Europe, which pretty
                                      >>> much killed the party, in name at least, else where in the world. But
                                      >>> teh word Nazi was used to mean , for lack of a better term, anal about
                                      >>> something, long before world war 2. it is NOT a comparison to Hitler
                                      >>> or anti-semetism, but to FASCISM, which, in this case, isn't too far
                                      >>> off. Very stringent rules, forced following of the most stringent
                                      >>> application of the rules, no exceptions? sounds about right.
                                      >>>
                                      >>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Johnson <jljonsn@...> wrote:
                                      >>>
                                      >>>>
                                      >>>>
                                      >>>> I wish people would refrain from casually throwing out the term
                                      >>>> "Authenticity Nazi". It's highly offensive for anyone to be compared
                                      >>>> to mass-murdering fascists.
                                      >>>>
                                      >>>>
                                      >>>
                                      >>
                                      >>
                                      >
                                    • leaking pen
                                      ... and sits down before the mod god smites me hard for continuing to post on the topic::
                                      Message 18 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                                      • 0 Attachment
                                        ::applauds, points with a sign saying, THATS WHAT IM TRYING TO SAY,
                                        and sits down before the mod god smites me hard for continuing to post
                                        on the topic::


                                        On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, <conradh@...> wrote:
                                        >
                                        >
                                        >
                                        > And even setting current political jabs aside, long before the German Nazi
                                        > Party got around to truly notorious stuff like running murder factories
                                        > and starting World War II, it was already well known for being into
                                        > intolerance, sucking up to authority, abusing authority they happen to
                                        > have themselves, dress codes, elaborate rules and general bad boundaries.
                                        > The people (myself definitely included) who find the "Authenticity Nazi"
                                        > label appropriate for a certain sort of reinactor have these vices in
                                        > mind, not anti-Semitism or militarism.
                                        >
                                        > The "bad boundaries" issue is central here. If you have high standards of
                                        > authenticity _for yourself_ there is nothing to criticize and much to
                                        > admire, IMHO. Whether this comes from perfectionism, artistic motives,
                                        > curiousity or serious experimental archaeology, it's all good.
                                        >
                                        > Where the bad boundaries come in is when people forget that other people
                                        > have different motives. The person who really believes that "this really
                                        > upsets _me_, so _you_ have to stop doing it right now!" is being utterly
                                        > selfish in a way they usually don't even recognize as such.
                                        >
                                        > There's nothing wrong with having your own standards. There's nothing
                                        > wrong with using those standards to judge other people, or artifacts,
                                        > either. But there's a million miles of difference between having
                                        > standards and thinking that having standards gives you the right to push
                                        > other people around.
                                        >
                                        > Ulfhedinn
                                        >
                                        > On Sun, May 3, 2009 11:37 pm, leaking pen wrote:
                                        >> What? Both groups believe in a very strong moral code, with laws that
                                        >> match, and a heavily governed and controled social situation. I was not
                                        >> trying to be insulting, but merely give a modern comparison to that
                                        >> segment of the philosophy of the Nazi party. If we were talking about
                                        >> social welfare, I'd point out that the Nazi parties views on such were
                                        >> very similar to the current Democratic party, in that they believed in a
                                        >> "safety net" for those too old or infirm to work, and
                                        >> several minimums of standard including a minimum wage and profit caps on
                                        >> industries.
                                        >>
                                        >> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 11:29 PM, quailriver <quailriver@...> wrote:
                                        >>
                                        >>>
                                        >>>
                                        >>>> Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very similar
                                        >>>> to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in that
                                        >>>> regard.
                                        >>>
                                        >>> Wow, that remark is really sickly twisted!
                                        >>>
                                        >>>
                                        >>> --- In medievalsawdust@yahoogroups.com, leaking pen <itsatrap@...>
                                        >>> wrote:
                                        >>>
                                        >>>>
                                        >>>> The Nazi party was a world wide fascist movement that favored strong
                                        >>>> govermental control of society, and a very stringent moral requirement
                                        >>>> that people follow. There was a very large Nazi party here in the
                                        >>>> us. Other than being athiest in general, the Nazi party was very
                                        >>>> similar to the fundamentalist Christian arm of the Republican party in
                                        >>>> that regard. ONE BRANCH of the Nazi Party, the one in Germany that
                                        >>>> elected Adolph Hitler as their party candidate to the German
                                        >>>> presidential election, which he then won, then went largely
                                        >>>> anti-semetic and went on a rampage throughout Europe, which pretty
                                        >>>> much killed the party, in name at least, else where in the world. But
                                        >>>> teh word Nazi was used to mean , for lack of a better term, anal about
                                        >>>> something, long before world war 2. it is NOT a comparison to Hitler
                                        >>>> or anti-semetism, but to FASCISM, which, in this case, isn't too far
                                        >>>> off. Very stringent rules, forced following of the most stringent
                                        >>>> application of the rules, no exceptions? sounds about right.
                                        >>>>
                                        >>>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Johnson <jljonsn@...> wrote:
                                        >>>>
                                        >>>>>
                                        >>>>>
                                        >>>>> I wish people would refrain from casually throwing out the term
                                        >>>>> "Authenticity Nazi". It's highly offensive for anyone to be compared
                                        >>>>> to mass-murdering fascists.
                                        >>>>>
                                        >>>>>
                                        >>>>
                                        >>>
                                        >>>
                                        >>
                                        >
                                        >
                                      • James W. Pratt, Jr.
                                        Politics...delete...delete...delete Not wood working stuff ...delete delete...delete Picture of table.... save James Cunningham With not enough time to read or
                                        Message 19 of 26 , May 4, 2009
                                        • 0 Attachment

                                          Politics...delete...delete...delete

                                          Not wood working stuff ...delete delete...delete

                                          Picture of table.... save

                                           

                                          James Cunningham

                                          With not enough time to read or type a response

                                        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.