4626Re: [medieval-leather] copyrights...
- Jul 2 12:48 PM
>Anyway, she says a 1922 copyright (unless extended by an act of Congressyou don't know about) is expired, period.
If in the US, in the UK when they fell into line with Europe, expired
copyrights, became copyrighted again although I don't think retrospective
action could be taken but new infrigment eg now was is not allowed, very
My sister know more than me her line exactly :) (BBC lawyer)
>She also points out that Mickey(who's a bit of a special case anyway) was renewed before his copyright
ran out, 2003 if Magnus has the right date. So in principle, if you
posted a WWI-era article today, and congress extended the copyright later,
your use would have occured while the copyright laxed.
Yes but in European law your use after extension would possibily not be
valid. Also if the article was a European one our copyright should overide
any US law
>However, as Melanie pointed out, anybody can sue anyone for anything, butthe web and the academic nature of the posting are natural protections.
Not natural but they make sueing not as commercially attractive :)
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>