Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Problem 110, clarification

Expand Messages
• If I define the function on all but one point, that point is an isolated singularity. The function may, of course, have a holomorphic continuation to that
Message 1 of 4232 , Nov 4, 1999
If I define the function on all but one point,
that point is an isolated singularity. The function
may, of course, have a holomorphic continuation to
that point, in which case I would call the singularity
"removable". Hence, solving problem 110 requires some
definition of "pole" and "essential" singularity for
functions from C to C^2. But the definitions I use involve
Laurent series. Is there an equivalent definition whose
analog to C -> C^2 functions is clear, or is there
some analog to the Laurent series in this case?
• can t sleep (yawn), i spent around 3 hr.s on your your original post here. it seems this implicit function solution set is the semi-stable modular eliptical
Message 4232 of 4232 , Apr 25, 2011
can't sleep (yawn), i spent around 3 hr.s on your your original post here. it seems this implicit function solution set is the semi-stable modular eliptical curves A. Wiles gave in his proof of fermat's last theorem. Your function is way simpler. have to get some sleep before i got to go to work, but the proof of this is around 4 to 5 pages as you said. i'll have to look at it more this evening. also, what's the scoop of you being the source for the plot of tron legacy? we should all get royalties! heheh.
--- In mathforfun@yahoogroups.com, jeshields_98 wrote:
>
> I hit the wrong button...<br><br>It should be = c^n<br>not + c^n<br><br>very VEEERRRRRYYYYY important<br><br>sorry
>
I
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.