Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: question part4 #8 (Ranger & Slim)

Expand Messages
  • cs_smile
    Video Ranger >>Well, let u = x+y<< Slim >>x���� - 3x - 2 - 3/x + 1/x���� = 0 Set u = x + 1/x<< this is a problem
    Message 1 of 4232 , Mar 5, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      Video Ranger >>Well, let u =
      x+y<<<br><br>Slim >>x� - 3x - 2 - 3/x + 1/x� = 0<br><br>Set u
      = x + 1/x<<<br><br>this is a problem from
      sometime ago<br>how did both of u come up with ur method?
      hmm... i dun understand how u guys figure it out. why
      let the no. in that way?
    • sum_what_ever
      can t sleep (yawn), i spent around 3 hr.s on your your original post here. it seems this implicit function solution set is the semi-stable modular eliptical
      Message 4232 of 4232 , Apr 25, 2011
      • 0 Attachment
        can't sleep (yawn), i spent around 3 hr.s on your your original post here. it seems this implicit function solution set is the semi-stable modular eliptical curves A. Wiles gave in his proof of fermat's last theorem. Your function is way simpler. have to get some sleep before i got to go to work, but the proof of this is around 4 to 5 pages as you said. i'll have to look at it more this evening. also, what's the scoop of you being the source for the plot of tron legacy? we should all get royalties! heheh.
        --- In mathforfun@yahoogroups.com, jeshields_98 wrote:
        >
        > I hit the wrong button...<br><br>It should be = c^n<br>not + c^n<br><br>very VEEERRRRRYYYYY important<br><br>sorry
        >
        I
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.