Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: HD Monitor Update

Expand Messages
  • Michael
    Grrrrrrrrrr! I simply cannot locate the invoice! While I was a Chiefland last weekend, my wife decided to clean MY room. I may NEVER be able to find
    Message 1 of 39 , May 5, 2011
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Grrrrrrrrrr!

      I simply cannot locate the invoice!
      While I was a Chiefland last weekend, my wife decided to "clean' "MY" room.
      I may NEVER be able to find anything again except by accident!

      When/if it does turn up, I will certainly post the info here.

      Mike

      --- In mallincam@yahoogroups.com, "tsh@..." <tsh@...> wrote:
      >
      > Mike
      > That information did not help much. I find from 22 products to 3000
      > products on Amazon according to which search terms I use.
      > Is there any chance you still have a email or receipt that might show
      > Amazon's part number. Even a picture might help.
      >
      > The closest thing I could find was the Atlona Video and S-Video + Audio
      > to HDMI converter Scaler up to 1080p for
      > $287.99
      >
      > Tom Hilton
      >
      >
      > On 5/4/2011 12:52 PM, Michael wrote:
      > >
      > > The company is called (wait for it!)..........HD VIDEO PROCESSING!!! :)
      > >
      > > There is no model number on the device...but there is a sticker on the
      > > box that reads
      > > V363.
      > >
      > > On the unit it says "Composite/S-Video HDMI Scaler Converter.
      > >
      > > I ordered it through AMAZON for $269.00
      > >
      > > Mike
      > >
      > > *Mike's Video Arcade
      > > Open Nightly - Chiefland, FL. USA
      > > AAA, AARP Discounts
      > > As about our group rates.
      > >
      > > --- In mallincam@yahoogroups.com <mailto:mallincam%40yahoogroups.com>,
      > > "tsh@" <tsh@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Mike
      > > > You also said you was using a SVideo to HD upconverter. I would imagine
      > > > that the quality of this device would also make a difference.
      > > > can you tell us the make and source of this also.
      > > >
      > > > Tom
      > > >
      > > > On 5/3/2011 11:11 PM, Michael wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > I was able to use the Marshall 7" HD monitor this past weekend at
      > > > > Chiefland and even had it
      > > > > operating side-by-side with my SPECO.
      > > > >
      > > > > While the CRT seems to have more 'punch' to the image, there is
      > > simply
      > > > > no contest when it comes to detail and resolution.
      > > > >
      > > > > I'm still learning how to adjust the multitude of settings on the new
      > > > > Marshall but there is no doubt that it is now my primary monitor.
      > > > >
      > > > > I'm running S-Video out of the Mallincam into an HD upconverter which
      > > > > processes the signal to 1080p and feeds the monitor with an HDMI
      > > > > connection.
      > > > > Even though I know this is not delivering 'true' HD - the images are
      > > > > spectacular!
      > > > >
      > > > > The monitor allows 16.9, 4.3, full-screen (which, happily, turns out
      > > > > to be almost the same as the native output of the MC) and pixel to
      > > > > pixel images.
      > > > >
      > > > > Comparing images of M-82's nucleus, there is a wealth of fine
      > > > > filamentary detail visible in the HD image that is just not seen (or
      > > > > is undefined) in the SPECO. Red colors in nucleus and blue in outer
      > > > > regions much more pronounced in Marshall.
      > > > >
      > > > > The dust lanes in M-104, NGC-4565 and NGC-5128 look "etched" in
      > > the HD
      > > > > and small irregularities are easily and clearly seen. Again, in the
      > > > > SPECO, this fine detail is blurred out.
      > > > >
      > > > > M-83 shows vastly more faint detail in it's nucleus and the spiral
      > > > > arms are much more extensive and show fainter clusters and dust
      > > clouds
      > > > > that are simply not seen in the SPECO.
      > > > >
      > > > > 28" f/3.7 Starstructure. MC with MFR-3 and 20mm of spacers.
      > > > > (***ATTENTION JACK H. - help me with the math! What is my effective
      > > > > f/ratio?). :)
      > > > > Most observations at 28-second iterations.
      > > > >
      > > > > Mike Harvey
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
    • yknott456
      No, I think Shevill is the all-time winner in that regard. Al
      Message 39 of 39 , May 6, 2011
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        No, I think Shevill is the all-time winner in that regard.

        Al

        --- In mallincam@yahoogroups.com, "Michael" <mharveyww1@...> wrote:
        >
        > Yep...that's it!
        >
        > I got the price confused with another piece of equipment.
        >
        > Am I the only one who has "too much #@!**!"?
        >
        > Mike H.
        >
        >
        > --- In mallincam@yahoogroups.com, "tsh@" <tsh@> wrote:
        > >
        > > Mike
        > >
        > > Brian posted a link that might be it. Does this look like your unit?
        > >
        > > http://www.ramelectronics.net/audio-video/video-converters/composite-video-to-hdmi-dvi/v363/prodV363.html
        > >
        > > Tom Hilton
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        > >
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.