Re: [mach1mach2cnc] Source of misunderstanding...
I think everything over the past few days was a miss understanding :)
BUT I must say we got some very good input from it! No one got hurt and
we are getting a server setup to keep the source code on with better rev
control. All and all I think in the end this was a good thing. (Odd how
> Mark and Brian,
> As a confirmed pashunate (hot headed) member of this list, I think I
> understand what caused the recent ruffled feathers.
> In a post to Mark, Brain wrote this as a "note to self":
> "So note for the future don't post on list what is
> needed to get people to do what they need to do ;."
> And I *think* Mark thought Brian meant it for him.
> If I'm wrong, just chalk it up to another email misunderstanding, but
> I think we're all pulling on the same end of the rope here.
> All the best to both parties,
- Hi SCOT, Yep that was my app over on the MACH site. I use an encoder
signal to identify each position with a unique ID. That part works
fine just got stuck on the hotswap logic inside of mach. (;-)
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "poppa_bear1000"
> contact me off list, at:
> poppabear AT hughes.net
> (remove white spaces and change AT to @)
> we can discuss it.........
> but even so, until Brain fixes the "Hole" in the Armor of VB, the
> WILL Crash your computer very, very hard. Blue Screen of DeathHard, or
> hard lock up that you have to cut off the compter and reboot tounlock.
> On the support forum there is a VB Thread for "Hot Swap" ATC, that
> is a much simpler than mine, and works in a different way, but getsto
> the end result of a Hot Swap. The way that one was done, does notwork
> for my app so I did mine a different route.HS
> I orginally had my Hot Swap completly runing on my PLC with its own
> pulse module to control its caracell servo. I wanted to move thesystem
> completly to mach3 and have mach3 run the C axis for the Caracell.When
> I moved that programing over (the way I was doing it), it crashedmach,
> and thus, I found a hole......