RE: [mach1mach2cnc] Re: Version 1.90.070 - major code change warning..
- Art, nice news for the new toolpath. Seems to work quite well here. The Z
index has disappeared. Is it a desire ?
On another front, i think that the config menu should be simplified. Those
extensives menus are confusing for users, and tends to make mach3 a software
seen more complex than it can be.
One of the biggest problem of mach3 for is acceptance is that it is seen
like a very complex program. This is not really the case. This can be solved
organizing some menus.
I'm quite sure that if you can do those small menu modifications, mach3 will
directly become more user friendly. It is more important according to me
that the toolpath window development for example.
Here is actually my opinion concerning priority :
1) engine reliability enhancement and finishing low level functions like the
sequencer, G100, synchronized spindle, low level screwmapping and realtime
2) user interface - menu enhancements - screen enhancements - language
translation enhancements for menus and windows.
4) toolpath and other secondary importance things.
I think that lazycam, addons and main screens beautifull graphic design
should be left in the background until mach3 points 1, 2 and 3 are not
The G100 project is not yet finished and seems to take much longer time than
previously imagined. Is there a problem with the firmware code development ?
Here is a few ideas :
- lock and unlock could be moved to the operator menu
- select native units could be moved to the motor tuning window
- Ports and pins is not self explanatory. I would name this menu "Input /
- Homing/limits, Slave axis, Backlash, Screwmapping, Formulas, Calibrate
Spindle could be moved to a single line menu named "Axis config", and next
splitted with an indexed window.
- logic and state is not self explanatory. I would group those two menu
inside a "general config" menu, and eventually split with an indexed window.
- "Fonts" and "system hotkeys" could be moved to the "general config"
I would add a separation line for the last lines of the menu. With an
This new arrangement reduce the number of menu line from 22 to 11. I think
that 22 lines is a design flaw. it is very difficult to watch a 22 lines
menu. It is always confusing each time we open it.
In the end we could have :
- Input Output settings
- Axis settings
- Motor Tuning
- General Config
- Calibrate MPG
- Setup Modbus Control
- Serial Monitor
- Edit Button script
- Reset Device Sel
- Check Config
Thanks for your listening,
I found it-my kernel speed got reset to 25KHz in Mach3(I use 45KHz) This
was limiting my top speed, but it was also doing strange things with the
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of art
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [mach1mach2cnc] Re: Version 1.90.070 - difference in
I cant see any reason for that one. Mine is joggin at 685 and is set
to a max of 686 , so it seems to track....
Videos And Support Forums http://www.machsupport.com
Users Map: http://www.frappr.com/machsupport
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:11 PM
Subject: [mach1mach2cnc] Re: Version 1.90.070 - difference in Jogging
OK, with D1.90.072, keyboard jog is even starnger.
The rapid jog moves that I get are only at 37.51 in/min(rather than
my axis setting of 60 in/min. This is with only one axis moving at a
time, and with slow jog set at 100%.
And --- In email@example.com, "Andy Wander" <awander@...>
> This was using the keyboard arrow keys, with "SHIFT" held down to
> the machine move at rapid rate. It doesn't seem to do it if I don't
> the SHIFT key.
> Andy Wander |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Andy Wander
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:59 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [mach1mach2cnc] Re: Version 1.90.070 - difference in
> I was just fooling around in 1.90.070, and I noticed that keyboard
> jogging seemed strange. When i released the jog keys after doing a
> rapid jog, it took almost one full second fo rthye axis to begin to
> ramp down, and then it "dropped" down abruptly to zero speed.
> I tried this over again, after a reboot, with the same results.
> installed 1.90.064, 1.90.060, and fiunally R1.84.002 all of them
> the same way.
> I went back to my Mach2 install, and it acts as it should in
> My motor settings on X & Y are 60 in/min max spoeed and 2 in/s/s
> (of course, in Mach2, it's 1in/s speed)
> Any ideas?
> Andy Wander
> www.machsupport.com - Web site Access
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> This communication including any attachments, are intended
> for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and contains
> confidential or copyrighted materials. Duplication,
> distribution or reproduction is strictly prohibited by law
> without written permission of Verrex
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
www.machsupport.com - Web site Access
Yahoo! Groups Links
This communication including any attachments, are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and contains
confidential or copyrighted materials. Duplication,
distribution or reproduction is strictly prohibited by law
without written permission of Verrex