Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

53[lxx] Re: Ostrog clarification

Expand Messages
  • james and tatyana miller
    Oct 7, 1999
    • 0 Attachment
      DK:

      Do I understand correctly that you're saying that the only part of the
      Ostrog Bible that was translated from the Vulgate were the so-called
      Deuterocanonical books? If so, this implies that the rest of the Ostrog
      Bible was a translation from some other biblical manuscript, and thus from
      a different (from Latin) language. Can you say anything about what the
      remainder of the Ostrog Bible (i.e., other than the Deuterocanonicals) was
      a translation of?

      Thanks, James Miller
    • Show all 18 messages in this topic