Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

2593RE: [lxx] Are they spurious?

Expand Messages
  • Tony Costa
    Nov 1, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Actually it is all of Mark 16:9-20 which is spurious as well as 1 John 5:7.
      There are others in the NT. For a very helpful resource on this question see
      Bruce M. Metzger. The New Testament: Its Background, Growth and Content (3rd
      edition; Abingdon Press).

      Tony Costa


      From: lxx@yahoogroups.com [mailto:lxx@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of kwabena
      Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 7:03 PM
      To: lxx@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [lxx] Are they spurious?

      I have read that Mark 16:16-17 and also 1 John 5:7 are spurios. Could
      someone help me about them. And could they let me know if there are more?

      Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
      boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 9 messages in this topic