Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

2296RE: [lxx] original Greek

Expand Messages
  • andrew fincke
    Jun 6, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear List,
      I'm delivering a paper on the reconstruction of 1QSam in DJD (Discoveries in
      the Judaean Desert) Volume 1 at the IOQS in Lubjlana in July and am puzzled
      by the editor's (Barthelemy's) statement to en garzel at 2 Samuel 21:18:
      "LXX a en garzel corrige ensuite en en geq", i.e.
      "LXX has en garzel corrected later to en geq ("in Gat")."
      Facr is:
      1) MT has begov "in Gov"
      2) Codex Vaticanus, Peshitta, Ethiopian, Armenian and Ahnxa-2 of the Greek
      ms. have en geq
      3) Lucianic ms. have in gazeq
      4) Most of the Greek has en garzel.
      Why is Varicanuis, Peshitta: en geq called a "later correction"?
      Andrew Fincke

      Don�t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft
      Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/
    • Show all 2 messages in this topic