Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

1867RE: [lxx] Re: Luke 3:36 and the LXX

Expand Messages
  • David Hindley
    Dec 21, 2005
      Weiland,

      Dang! Wrong Cain.

      You are right, the second Cain is not found in Josephus (or SP). Outside the Lxx, it is found in Jubilees. That would still, of course, make it pre Christian if the Ethiopic translation using this name was not influenced by the NT or Lxx. I do not have the resources to determine whether the DSS fragments of Jubilees includes this passage.

      Respectfully,

      Dave Hindley
      Cleveland, Ohio USA



      -----Original Message-----
      From: sentto-1293705-1755-1135158377-dhindley=compuserve.com@... [mailto:sentto-1293705-1755-1135158377-dhindley=compuserve.com@...] On Behalf Of Wieland Willker
      Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:31 AM
      To: LXX-List
      Subject: [lxx] Re: Luke 3:36 and the LXX


      Thanks for your answers!

      Dave Hindley:
      > The name is also found in the Samaritan Pentateuch, and Josephus

      Could you provide references? I can't find it in Josephus. In Ant. book 1 he explicitly writes: "Shem, the third son of Noah, had **five** sons" and also: "Sala was the son of Arphaxad"

      [snip]
    • Show all 19 messages in this topic