Re: [lowercase-sound] Enjoyment of Field Recordings (?)
- At 03:36 AM 10/31/01 -0000, wownflutter@... wrote:
>>>>I'm just trying to articulate why field recordings (and drones) are
I will concur with Howard's remarks about field recordings as source
material for various processing, by artists such as Marchetti, Bennett, et
al (I'd also add Ora, Eric LaCasa and mnortham to his list of artists
working in this area).
There are two additional elements to field recordings that I find
attractive that haven't come up in this thread yet. The first was pointed
out by Bernhard Günter in interviews, and perhaps on this list: sounds from
the real world have much more complex, and therefore more interesting,
sonic properties than electronically generated ones. Bernhard uses
recorded sounds almost exclusively in his compositions for this reason.
This is probably why all of the artists that Howard mentions are able to
create such interesting and different work.
The second reason really addresses the drone question as much as the field
recordings. I love drones, especially ones based on field recordings,
because they don't coerce me into acting in a certain rhythm. If I'm
dancing, walking, or any number of other activities that require momentum,
music with beats is great. But for listening or as background to creative
work, beatless music is essential for letting my body and mind find their
- --- Howard Stelzer <hstelzer@...> wrote:
> The sounds are simply building blocks, likeaaaaaaaahhhhhhh, yes...and what fun and enjoyment to use these...
> instruments or
> recordings of anything else.
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.