Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Fwd: Scholars and Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax with Facts Obscured by USG

Expand Messages
  • crystalpyramid@snafu.de
    I have known this to be true from the start... Btw, the Andreas von Bülow mentioned below as a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth is a former assistant
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 2, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      I have "known" this to be true from the start...

      Btw, the Andreas von Bülow mentioned below as a member of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" is a former assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service, minister for research and technology, and member of the German Parliament for 25 years. This highly distinguished and high-profile personality is also the author of several books, among them "Die CIA und der 11. September. Internationaler Terror und die Rolle der Geheimdienste." (The CIA and September 11. International Terror and the Role of the Secret  Services). He has nothing to gain in conventional terms from committing himself the way he does to exposing the truth behind 9/11, but in contrast has been viciously attacked for it.

      Do visit



      EYE-OPENING REPORT! – PRWeb, Wednesday, February 2, 2006

      Duluth, MN – A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

      They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T)


      because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.

      These experts suggest these EVENTS MAY HAVE BEEN ORCHESTRATED by elements within the administration to MANIPULATE AMERICANS INTO SUPPORTING POLICIES at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."

      They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.

      They are encouraging news services around the world to secure scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they believe, require extraordinary measures.

      If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this nation from ever greater abuse.

      They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expected from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might compensate for its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth about one of the great turning-point events of modern history.

      Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or dereliction of duty.

      The official conspiracy theory -- that nineteen Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought this about -- is unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have studied. They even believe there are good reasons for suspecting that video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden ARE NOT GENUINE.  

      They have found the government's own investigation to be severely flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.

      They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by NO airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.

      Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholars find profoundly troubling:

      – In the history of structural engineering, steell-frame high-rise
      buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or
      since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is
      this possible?

      – The BBC has reported that at least fiive of the nineteen alleged
      "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet
      according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How
      is this possible?

      – Frank DeMartini, a projeect manager for the WTC, said the buildings
      were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the
      impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito
      netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this

      – Since the melting poinnt of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature
      of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and
      UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings
      cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?

      – Flight 77, which allegedly hit the buildingg, left the radar screen
      in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very
      close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this

      – Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enoough to coordinate hijacking
      four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage
      to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this

      – Secretary of Transportation Norman Miineta, in an underground bunker
      at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young
      officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon,
      "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it
      down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?

      – A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that
      Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left
      debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it
      is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this

      – A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty
      on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and
      distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is
      this possible?

      – The Pentagon conducted a trainingg exercise called "MASCAL"
      simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October
      2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted
      that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a
      weapon. How is this possible?

      Their own physics research has established that only controlled
      demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and
      virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While
      turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their
      own footprints.

      These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude
      that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach -- which
      has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser -- of
      "creating our own reality."






      In the spirit of Love,
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.