Re: [linuxham] Capture Sample Rate Setting for digiKeyer and SignaLink USB users
- On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:39:38 -0600
Dick Kriss <aa5vu@...> wrote:
> Jaak ES1HPWatch for reports of "clicks" on your TX signal. This was a problem
> The 28-Nov posting was intended for Mac OS X cocoaModem users. Good
> to hear your Windows XP DigiKeyer setup is working FB at 44100. I
> may try 44100 to see what, if anything, happens
> Dick AA5VU
early on in fldigi developement. The Native setting was the fix and
that should be the default setting you use.
Re: [linuxham] Capture Sample Rate Setting for OS X and SignaLink USB usersThis is a follow up to my earlier posting. Posted on top to ditch
the quote marks.
As a test I have changed the fldigi-3.13BF Sample rate for both
Capture and Playback from the native 32000 to 44100.
I have had a few uneventful RTTY QSOs. So far all is well at
44100 to a SignaLink USB using Mac OS X 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard).
On 11/30/09 8:32 PM, "Dick Kriss" <aa5vu@...> wrote:
--- snipped some of the text ---
I had all kinds of weird issues with the early versions of OS X with the
SignaLink USB until I changed the cocoaModem receive sampling rate
to its default 160000 s/s setting. I adopted the same setting when I
changed from cocoaModem to fldigi last year. Based on W7AY’s recent
posting, I changed to the fldigi native Capture setting of 32000 and
have had no issues.
My assumption (guess) is Apple may have made some audio handling
improvements from the early OS X (Leopard) releases to the current
OS 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard).
Any fldigi OS X and USB Audio CODEC (SignaLink USB) users having
success with lower or higher Capture settings? I am not sure I really
understand how to optimize the setting for RTTY decoding.
73 Dick AA5VU
- EdI like what you’ve done. Having the one extra command to add the correct repo would have saved me a couple of hours. I do have one suggestion…add a sentence to each command explaining what it is doing. This would help educate people about how Linux works.Clark, AL7EK
- On 03/23/2015 10:58 AM, Clark Sann acsann@... [linuxham] wrote:
> EdWell actually Greg KI7MT should get the credit. After a couple of off
> I like what you’ve done. Having the one extra command to add the
> correct repo would have saved me a couple of hours. I do have one
> suggestion…add a sentence to each command explaining what it is
> doing. This would help educate people about how Linux works.
> Clark, AL7EK
list emails, I incorporated his idea to the wiki. Sure beats trying to
figure where the individual desktop managers hide the information.