Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Kachina Freq Ref usage

Expand Messages
  • w3frg01
    Dave, I use the CW offset set to 500 at all times, so I guess I wouldn t see what you commented about. I have compared both the CAT and 505.exe Freq Cal s and
    Message 1 of 4 , Jun 12, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Dave,

      I use the CW offset set to 500 at all times, so I guess I wouldn't see
      what you commented about. I have compared both the CAT and 505.exe Freq
      Cal's and find them identical to the ear. I have nothing set up to
      actually measure the Delta Fo.

      Tom (frg)

      --- In linuxham@yahoogroups.com, "David Freese" <w1hkj@...> wrote:
      >
      > I've just checked the KC505.EXE reference frequency performance
      > against the KachinaCAT running on Windows XP and then on Linux. The
      > KachinaCAT program gives identical results. I did find that the
      > transceiver was able to make the internal adjustments better if the CW
      > offset was set to 500 Hz. I recommend setting the CW offset to 500
      > just before calibration and then returning it to your normal CW ops
      > after the calibration.
      >
      > I would appreciate some feedback on your observation of the effect of
      > the CW offseet on the calibration function.
      >
      > The next revision of KachinaCAT will include changing the offset to
      > 500 and then returning it to your default at the conclusion of the
      > calibration run.
      >
      > Dave, (hkj)
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.