Re: [linuxham] Fldigi feature request - Macro tag additions
- On 03/10/2013 02:58 PM, w1hkj wrote:Hello Bill,
We date from the same era. I started programming military hardware in 1965.
...along with a few wierd machines that used Mercury filled drums as an acoustical storage media
Agreed, local time is only useful to "locals" --- I use Zulu because that is when the call was logged, and a few have included the contact number when QSL'ing. It did make it slightly easier to verify the QSL. - but in reality, the QSO number is just another form of a brag sheet.If we have an on air QSO, don't bother telling the QSO #, it just goes into the bit bucket. I currently have 2,437 digital QSOs in the logbook. But it is only of passing interest to me. I'm not fond of being told the current time of day in Lower Podunk, USA either. But I know a lot of folks think it is an important part of the QSO.
Boy, we DO date from the same era. I like to see what the other guy has in his shack, but once I've seen that, it's much more fun to talk about other things. (Especially since I saw the list in his previous QSO to someone else!) Recently, I meet a gentleman on te air that lived one-house away from where I lived as a child in 1950. It kind blew his mind when I asked if the railroad tracks were still near the "water plant". You see, when I was about 9 or 10, they built a new disposal plant just down the road from where I lived, and while they were testing the plant, I was allowed access to see how it worked!!! The testing engineers were amazed that a ten-year old could understand what they were talking about - and It was kinda neat to be treated as a "grown up"For the most part I would rather hear about your last long walk with your dog, or what movie you saw with your spouse or significant other.
It also blew the mind of the ham I was talking to, while he thought about it for a moment or two!!! (grin)
That said, the answer is yes, the QSO record number can probably be added to the macro tags. I'll put your request in the ham-do list :-)
Digital keyboarding is and should be a lot more than just trading macros!
and thanks for the feature consideration
73's Bill Turner, wb4alm
- On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Ed wrote:
> You would *never* want to log the start time if you are in a DX piileup.You're missing the point.
> How are they supposed to know when you started ? You always log end
As short as DX pileup QSOs tend to be, if the start time (which is
normally set when the call is filled into Fldigi's log fields, and is
usually what is logged for ragchew QSOs) is kept current until I can get
to the DX station, it's almost the same as the end time. It's certainly
close enough for LOTW, unless someone's clock is off. If I can update
that start time automatically whenever I send a call to the DX station, I
can consistently use the same logging and QSL procedures for both ragchews
and pileups without having to worry about extra steps when the QSO
Brian Smith WB4ES / avalon73 at caerleon dot us / WWW nexus.caerleon.us
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in
session. -- Mark Twain (1866)