Re: [linuxham] Ubuntu Spyware?
- Seems like a slippery slope to self-rationalize a breach against one's privacy to perpetually justify/legitimize more. Sending desktop search activity, the names of your own file searches, takes things to a whole new granular level. If you wanted to share potentially commercially valuable information with a third-party you'd make business arrangement such that you get a royalty or discount (it's your hardware, your content, and your behavior). What's in it ($$$) for the user to have his data/behavior collected? Especially if you ran your business on that PC, had your own intellectual property that you wanted to bring to market or publish, etc.
I've been a loyal Ubuntu user since the beginning, but it has become unclear to me what Ubuntu adds to Debian -- other than a new skin, the Unity interface (which I dislike) and monetizing spyware. Certainly my next upgrade will be Debian which, to my knowledge, does not install such "features". The good news is that most every ham package I've used for Linux basically treats Debian .DEB as a baseline for package releases, perhaps Red Hat .RPM as a second. It is not silly to expect an OS to keep your information private/secure. In addition to managing hardware resources and running programs, authorization is one of the chief purposes of any OS.
From: "Dave Wright" <hfradiopro@...>
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:33:29 AM
Subject: Re: [linuxham] Ubuntu Spyware?
Ok, so you're worried about privacy...understood. Good thing you posted this to Yahoo Groups and shared it with the world. I know exactly what you mean...no one wants their information spread all over; except for the fact that it already is:
- From QRZ I have your address (or the FCC database, or HamQTH, or....)
- I like that blue pickup truck and white car in your driveway (from Google Maps). Also, it looks like you have some nice trees to hang antennas in.
- I'm sure I could do some more digging and find your all kinds of information about you from your local county clerk...Texas is particularly open about their "public" information.
Oh, and why do you think that Yahoo (and Google, and others) host these Yahoo Groups and similar services? It isn't to provide a nice way for a bunch of hams to communicate...it is to collect your data and sell it to advertisers.
Like it or not, you can't stay clear of data collection; if you belong to email lists and if you have a license from a government agency with information that is freely published for all....not to mention credit card companies and stores selling your purchase history to advertisers...not to mention public records available in most of the western world.
People really get wrapped around the axle about Facebook, Amazon, Google and other data collection business (yes, that is a core component of their business!) while ignoring the obvious flaws in their logic. If you don't want to use Ubuntu, that's fine...but sticking your head in the sand about the nature of data collection and believing that you are immune based simply upon the OS you use is just silly these days.
"Real radio bounces off the sky"On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:17 PM, theloneaviator <theloneaviator@...> wrote:
Just thought I'd share this as so many of us are using Ubuntu. (or just me...)
I'm Probably a late comer to this intel, but maybe Linux mint is a better option?
I wasn't intending to "justify" it, just to point out that no one should be surprised and shocked about the "breach against one's privacy" while continuing to use tools like Google, Yahoo Groups, and many others.
My post was paraphrased from one I made on the 30MDG group a few months back regarding Facebook, where the originator had said that he would use Facebook because it didn't protect his privacy sufficiently. I intended solely to point out that in this hobby, none of us have privacy and worrying about Facebook while posting on Yahoo Groups and other public forums (and including his phone number on his emails) was silly.
In the end, the beautiful thing about Linux is that you can change distros at will, and one can switch from Ubuntu if they don't like the changes made (or don't want to simply TURN THEM OFF). Canonical has made a business decision and it will either backfire or will pay off hugely. Either way, life will go on, and some other company will simply collect all of that data some other way. The point I was trying to make was more to point out the hypocrisy of the complaint about privacy...in today's electronic world, there is no real "privacy" any longer...at least not if you are on-line in a public forum and also hold a public license.Dave
"Real radio bounces off the sky"On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM, <pfbram@...> wrote:
Seems like a slippery slope to self-rationalize a breach against one's privacy to perpetually justify/legitimize more.