Re: 2nd Linux computer on my D-LINK router - trouble
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "R. Clint Ellis" <rcellis@t...> wrote:
> I've been using a D-LINK router...got a second machine (running RH9) > and it won't quite talk to the router...the actual network interface
> is inactive and won't activate - no informative message.I've put maybe an hour into this so far - a status report: It strongly
looks like my problem begins at the new machine - eth0 does not seem
to be set up properly, though according to the available documentation
I've got it set up OK. There may be an interaction between the basic
ethernet setup and the fact that I am trying to let the D-Link 604 be
a DHCP server. (The D-Link shows a lease of a pool IP out to that
machine, so at one time I must have managed a good connection)
Just a quick update.
- Another quick update...
I've put new RJ45 ends on my cable just in case... The 604 says it
likes the cable, but still can't get the second machine to "see" the
router (nor anything else).
I've discovered that on the first, functioning connection/machine, the
ppp0e interface is defined but inactive... and won't activate.
Doesn't interfer with internet access. I suppose it was running long
enough to get me on the ADSL connection.. but haven't found much
documentation about this particular interface.
I have my D-Link 'stealthed' out so that Shields Up can't see it. It
also drops incoming pings so that test isn't good *toward* the router.
Pinging *from* the router to the 2nd machine times out (and I DONT
have ping shut off on that machine, unless RH9 defaults to OFF on that
setting - I'll have to check that).
I've now matched almost exactly the settings on the 2nd machine to the
first, (except where it applies to it's own IP) and still no joy.
Pinging from the 1st to the 2nd machine results in the DESTIMNATION
HOST UNREACHABLE message.
- you do not give a whole lot of info, but in general.... your DLink should be
connect and handle all the traffic to your modem. I am assuming you have a
4 port jobbie.
the DLink will have two IPs, one on the far end connected to the WAN and on
the LAN side. You then need to configure your boxes to talk and gateway
through the ethernet port to the LAN side of your router. That's it.
- On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 21:20, R. Clint Ellis wrote:
> Another quick update...I have a D-Link for my cable modem and use 3 PCs behind it. The D-Link
> I've put new RJ45 ends on my cable just in case... The 604 says it
> likes the cable, but still can't get the second machine to "see" the
> router (nor anything else).
can give out IP address via DHCP or you can use a static IP approach.
Since I only have 3 PCs behind it I went with static IPs so I always
know what PC has what IP.
My D-Link router gets my real IP from my cable ISP via DHCP. The D-Link
also has a LAN IP that is 192.168.1.1. So I set my other 3 PCs to have
the IP address of:
Next all I had to do was set the DEFAULT GATEWAY of each PC to:
which is the D-Link and it all works well.
Have you tried a similar setup? Did you set the default gateway on the
2nd PC to be the LAN IP of your D-Link?
The box said: "Requires Windows 98/2000/NT/XP or better."
So, I installed LINUX!
James Drabb JR
Senior Programmer Analyst
Davenport, FL USA
- Well, it turned out that my settings were pretty much OK all along...
it looks like the cable I was using was not up-to-speed. Either the
cable I was sold was the wrong type, (labeled Cerrocord CMPE129760
E129760 24WGXO and EIA/TIA 568A 4UTP CSA LL80671 FT6 - Enhanced CAT-5e
or my rusty cable-end attachment of the RJ45 connectors was
sub-standard. When I dragged the 2nd machine into my office and
connected it to the router using a shorter manufactured cable, it
worked just fine.
So I went to a local hardware dealer and bought a cable made up by
them (there fault if it was wrong) and it works fine....
...but here's the kicker. Within minutes of getting the machine
re-installed in it's intended place, the motherboard apparently blew
up! The mouse stopped working, the machine couldn't boot properly,
and when it did it got lost during the X-window initialization, other
It *was* and older machine (that's why it was going to be the kids
box) but this is just too much.
Well, here's what I learned:
1. Even if the the D-LINK 604 reports that the cable is OK, it might
2. My ISP provides me with ADSL, but does NOT use ppp0e - I should
have (and eventually dis) select the Cable Modem option during network
Apparently everything else I had *originally* done to set it up was OK.
Well, thanks for all the suggestions.
- R. Clint Ellis writes:
> Well, it turned out that my settings were pretty much OK all along...------------------------------^
> it looks like the cable I was using was not up-to-speed. Either the
> cable I was sold was the wrong type, (labeled Cerrocord CMPE129760
> E129760 24WGXO and EIA/TIA 568A 4UTP CSA LL80671 FT6 - Enhanced CAT-5e
Cable was probably ok, just the wrong cable.
>>(labeled Cerrocord CMPE129760I agree - the way I ended up buying it was the reason for the mistake:
>> E129760 24WGXO and EIA/TIA 568A 4UTP CSA LL80671 FT6
>> - Enhanced CAT-5e
> Cable was probably ok, just the wrong cable.
my wife was at the store and called me on cell to ask what kind of
cable I had been talking about (save me a trip) - I told her standard
ethernet cable for RG-45 connectors - she said the clerk didn't seem
too confident but cut a hundred feet of what he *thought* I meant. It
had 6 conductors of the right gauge, but in retrospect it clearly
wasn't the right cable. I didn't trip to it for a while 'cause my
cable-chasing days are many years behind me and the only other cables
I have in-house are not labeled. Oh well.