Re: [linux-dell-laptops] Re: Inspiron 2100 anybody..?
- the amount of ram on your video card has nothing
to do with the size of window you can display.
I suspect that any new laptop will be able to decode
mpeg fast enough without and video card assistance.
If that is all you want to do the amount of ram on the
card does not matter. You need enough video ram to
hold all the pixels you intend to display (with some
if you have 32bit color
you need 32bits*horizontalsize*verticalsize/8
bytess of ram
so if you screen is 1600x1200 at 32 bits /pixel you
need 7.68 meg of video ram. Anything more than that
is used for stuff like texture caching and other fancy
stuff. You don't need that for displaying dvd video
(I don't think)
if you can live with 16 bit color (65K colors)
then you'd only need abour 4 megs of video ram.
i hope that clears things up a bit for you.
--- Chris Mauricio <cmauricio@...> wrote:
> Stephen, thanks very much for that!__________________________________________________
> It lets me compare what is inside the 2100 ( when I
> order one ) meanwhile, I
> may give Dell a call and try to cajole a tech into
> confirming or denying ;-)
> I guess my reasons are a little nebulous- I have the
> I8K rwith 32 Mb ATI
> right now, and I can play DVD's just fine under it-
> Perhaps I don't *need* a
> card with more video ram on it, - maybe someone can
> comment on that? I use
> Xine 0.92 and I never run full screen , just in a
> window.. Does a 4Mb video
> card have a enough *oomph* to play back a DVD in a
> window on the 12.1" XGA
> screen @ 1024 x 768 16bpp resolution under linux?
> Anyway- still looking for comments from anyone with
> a Inspiron 2100 - likes,
> dislikes, caveats, anything-
> Thanks again,
> On Wednesday 31 October 2001 04:08, you wrote:
> > I'm not 100% sure on your setup but on my 5000e
> with the ATI 16Mb M3 it is
> > removable and I've done so. In fact I even too
> some pictures of it. They're
> > attached to a personal email to you.
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.