Policy Release: Libz Solution to Another State-School Disaster
- Policy Release
Libz Solution to Another State-School Disaster
Trevor Mallard has received a report showing there are reputedly 'practical'
and 'realistic' ways to reduce workload associated with the implementation
of the National Certificate of Educational Achievement. "Libertarianz
however have a far superior approach to repairing this problem," said Peter
Osborne, releasing the Libertarianz Policy to Deregulate Education today:
"Do away with NCEA altogether," hre says, "and do away with the state's
control of childrens' education. It has led to nothing but disaster!"
"The NCEA was only ever a tool for the Labour Government to pull teachers
into line, and to further dumb down education," says Osborne. "It must be
stopped. New Zealand's factory schools were only ever a tool to ensure that
teachers peddle whatever politically-correct mumbo jumbo the Government
wishes to force on your children - that too must be stopped."
"Literacy levels are the lowest ever, yet the taxpayer is footing the
largest education bill in this country's history," notes Osborne. That
apparent contradication, he suggests, can only be resolved when you realise
that literacy has never been a primary goal of the state's factory schools -
"their goal," says Osborne "has always been control of New Zealand's youth -
corralling them into becoming compliant political cannon fodder."
"The truth is that education in the government's factory schools is pumping
out an ever-increasing number of functionally illiterate and unemployable
youths - good for nothing beyond stuffing a ballot box," says Osborne. "As
the polls are showing, this system seems to be working. Most people are
unable to even see the writing on the wall." Mr Osborne explains this point.
"The state education system is completely unsustainable; it is only a matter
of time until it collapses altogether. The cost to us all will balloon to
breaking point and the social result will be retards by the thousands who
won't make it to a job interview as they can't even read a bus timetable."
Mr Osborne concludes with an excerpt from the Libertarianz Education Policy:
Indoctrination of impressionable young minds by 'politically correct' social
engineers will be ended as a matter of urgency. Libertarianz will give
schools back to their communities - literally - with ownership in existing
schools transferred to parents & teachers in the form of transferrable
shares.. Libertarianz will ultimately privatise ALL educational institutions
and leave decisions regarding curricula up to the schools. Parents will then
be able to choose the school that best reflects their own beliefs about
The full policy follows below. For further information, please contact Peter
Osborne, Libertarianz Associate Spokesman to Deregulate Education, (0274)
326 005, ospar@...
Education Policy: Take Back Your Schools!
Few systems boast incentives more perverse than public education, where
teacher's tenure - not merit - is remunerated, students with an "appetite
for destruction" are coddled with therapy, and school failure is rewarded
with an increased budget. And these are the least offensive facets of
child-centred, progressive public education. It's a sluggard of a system,
and it's turning out bumper crops of ignoramuses, which, all too often, have
no more than dangerously inflated self-esteems to show for years of
The state has no business in education. It has signally failed in the job,
and its compulsory factory-schools are little more than politically-correct
brainwashing factories wherein children's minds are turned into mush.
Literacy levels are less than they were a century ago, and students now
spend more time absorbing the politically-correct mush with which they are
spoon-fed than they do learning how to use the minds they were born with.
Since their inception, state schools have indoctrinated children with the
State's chosen values - and it is the only thing at which they have been
truly efficient! Half a century ago, the State's values dictated that
children were not allowed to speak Maori in schools; half a century later we
can't enter a classroom without a waiata being sung! The Greens' education
policy is a prime example:" compulsory Maori, but nothing to improve liteacy
or numeracy. It is time to remove the State's values from the schools
forthwith; it is time that school and state be separated, in the same way
and for the same reasons as the separation of church and state.
Libertarianz, if elected, would return people's tax money to allow them to
make their own choices in education. We would privatise all education
institutions and outstanding student loans, sell off the student-loan scheme
and abolish all forms of government allowances and subsidies.
Libertarianz, in short, advocates giving the schools back to the parents -
· Abandon taxpayer-funded payments to all schools forthwith, and
hand over the title deeds and keys of each school to the teachers and the
boards of trustees who are currently running them under the encumbrance of
state control, and to the parents of the children currently suffering there.
Between them, they may run them as they see fit.
· Remove all govt enforced schooling attendance regulations.
Parents will be free to educate their children as they wish.
· Abolish all state-mandated curricula, qualification and
registration requirements, and all other state requirements restricting the
pursuit of excellence and achievement in schools. Educators will be free to
promote their own methods in an open market to a clientele who have their
tax dollars back in their pockets.
· Privatise the Education Review Office. It's expertise can still
be made available to whomever wants to pay for it.
· Sell off the student loan scheme, at whatever rate it will earn.
· Abolish the Ministry of Education, the NZ Qualifications
Authority and all the related alphabet agencies that have overseen the
mind-washing of our young.
The new owners of these schools and tertiary institutions - the parents,
teachers and trustees - would have just been handed a valuable tradable
asset: if they need any transitional funding they will be able to sell
equity, take on debt, or enter into whatever lease-back deals they can
negotiate. They will be left free to sell all or parts thereof; to run
whatever curriculum at whatever hours they think will bring in customers;
and to hire, fire or retire any or all staff. They will be left free to
profit from their new schools in whatever way they wish, and to pay
teachers whatever they think they are worth.
Teachers Colleges will not be sold. Instead, and as a matter of urgency,
Libertarianz says that Teachers Colleges around the country should be burnt
to the ground, in the hope that the politically-correct evil oozing from
them for so long can be eradicated permanently from our culture!
Government is the organisation that holds a monopoly on physical force - it
is not appropriate that such an organisation educates children. As in all
things, libertarians say that those paying the piper should call the tune,
and be free to choose their piper they wish to hire - no one should be
forced to pay for a service they don't want to fund. And NO-ONE should be
forced to pay for or to send their children to an institution they despise.
As celebrated architect Frank Lloyd Wright said many years ago, "mass
production in education appeals to us as a prostitution we are not inclined
to encourage. . . . Not only do I regard the thing miscalled education as
murder, but a worse form of murder than war because war disposes of the
carcass, while [your] so-called education murders the soul and leaves the
dead to walk for a lifetime."
Libertarianz says we should end the murder now!
Q: While I can support the argument of freeing taxation to enable
individuals to choose and pay for the education of their liking, this
assumes that the persons making this decision will look to provide their
children with an education.
In the current 'handout' climate how will we educate the children of those
members of our society who do not have a sense of responsibility for
providing for their children and expect the state to pay for and provide ?
Surely the children who are left to be "brought up" by such people will get
no education and become alienated and disenfranchised due to their parents
irresponsibilities and through no fault of their own?
I agree wholeheartedly that we, as adults , make choices and are responsible
for those choices and the consequences of them - but are children able to do
so ? And should they suffer because of the choices their parents make or
fail to make? Unfortunately, not all parents are responsible.
A: Let me say first that underlying all Libertarianz policies is the desire
to free up people to make their own choices, and to take responsibility for
those choices. Necessary to that is a change in the culture in order to
diminish the 'handout culture' you recognise as wrong. After all, if we
don't get rid of the handout culture, then children will continue to grow up
learning that no sense of individual responsibility is necessary!
And isn't that exactlly what they are growing up with now? Hasn't the state
assumed responsibility for all of us in the name of looking after those few
who cannot help themselves? And over time, aren't fewer and fewer actually
able to look after themselves? The fact is, it is not up to government to
ensure that parents or guardians will look to provide their children with an
education. That is not the state's responsibility: It is up to the parents.
As you say, this may not be the choice of everyone, but I think perhaps you
are confusing education with schooling.
The fact is that attending govt approved factory schools is compulsory at
present, but education is not! In many cases, education is what children get
'after hours' - after they complete their day at the government's factory
schools. Many of the factory schools are attended only because they are
compulsory, and would not be able to attract anyone otherwise. Must the
state force parents to send children to these (at best) glorified day-care
centres? Are they so bad that children would not attend them if they weren't
What it comes down to I guess is this question: How can children learn to
abhor aggression when they are taught in a school system built on
aggression? How can they learn to abhor theft when they are taught in
schools funded by theft? Do we expect them to disregard these lessons
offered to them? Why should we be surprised when many of them then conclude
that theft is efficient, and that force is necessary to success?
In any case, the school system is not efficient. That is, it is efficicient
in one area only - it is terribly efficient at transmitting the values of
the State. Fifty years ago you were hit if you talked Maori in school; today
you are admonished if you don't. As the state's values change, so are
children made to follow.
But the factory schools don't keep up with real change. A recent report by
the U.S. National Center for Policy Analysis concluded: "In no other
industry in U.S. history has there been so little technological change as in
the field of public school education." NZ schools are no different - we now
have parliament arguing whether schools should be 'allowed' to teach phonics
again, decades after phonics was abandoned by the politically correct
state-school monopoly, and long after private practitioners - who kept the
phonics flame alive - have demonstrated the disaster of 'look-say' reading.
Isn't it best we simply removed this state-school monopoly?
Schooling is not education, and not all education is done in schools. But
once the monopoly is broken, factory schools will need to change in order to
induce attendance rather than force it, and then they might get rather
closer to educating children rather than dumbing them down.