Re: [globalvillages] TECH AWARDS for development solutions
- Hi Jeff
I haven't read all this thread so my reply may not be relevant - but I
saw your last post ref cheap solutions.
It is probably worth bearing in mind that - for many development ideas
- appropriate, small solutions are best because they can be implemented
by end-users (by individuals or by local communities) i.e.by the people
who really want the thing to start working and to keep working. Big
solutions have lots of interested parties - some of whom may be more
interested in photo-opportunities, talking shops, travel expenses and
miscellaneous perks related to the project than in actually making the
thing work and continue to work. Also - end users really know their
local situation and are best placed to recognise what would (and would
not) fill their genuine needs.
Obviously there is more to it than that - many other issues regarding
national and local administrative structures and decision making etc. -
but I suggest that - for many development ideas - as a general rule of
thumb, if something can be done by a local person with initiative then
it's probably got a better chance of widespread and long term success
(through multiple replication) than any grandiose top down programme.
This is why we need to set up structures through which local people can
be involved in debate with designers, technologists, philanthropists,
bankers, investors etc. (Building on the micro credit work of recent
years and combining it with the "death of distance" that we can have
through appropriate ICT use.)
Jeff Buderer wrote:
> Thanks for explaining. This may be a common issue in development. Is
> that your understanding: That many cheap solutions exist that possibly
> might be more effectively than more expensive ones?