RE: [Lambengolmor] PE14:56 erratum: "it is soiled" >> "it is eaten"
- 'PE14:56 erratum: "it is soiled" >> "it is eaten"'
'In the manuscript version of the "Early Qenya Grammar"; (PE15:56)...'
The subject heading and the text cite two different issues of _Parma
Eldalamberon_, 14 and 15. Which is correctly being corrected? I want to
clarify for my notes as I don't currently own either edition but have a list
of errata for future reference. Thank you.
[Grrrrrr. It should read "PE14" in both cases. My mistake. Sorry! CFH]
[By the way, note the "official" catalogue of errata for VT and PE at: