Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Possible ON -r derivation?

Expand Messages
  • Boris Shapiro
    Aiya! ... CFH I don t find that obvious. It is not at all unheard of to have double CFH suffixes in languages; ... Yes, you re right. I should have
    Message 1 of 9 , Apr 6, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      Aiya!

      Sunday, April 6, 2003, 5:56:18 PM, Carl F . Hostetter wrote:

      >> Here we have _-ro_, which is obviously not agentive (because an agentive
      >> ending _-ndo_ present). ...

      CFH> I don't find that obvious. It is not at all unheard of to have "double"
      CFH> suffixes in languages; ...


      Yes, you're right. I should have remembered cases like N _badhron_
      (_*badro-ndo_) etc.


      Namaarie! S.Y., Elenhil Laiquendo [Boris Shapiro]


      : nai ilqua eruanna i nee antanin terlinnuva sen ยท nai erye vartuva :
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.