ává a misprint in PE 17 ?
- Is _ává_ a misprint for _áva_ on PE 17:143?
"The longer form _avá, ává_ was only used..."
[Having checked my photocopies, I can confirm
that the reading _ává_ for the second form is
definitely correct. However, the published text
does contain a different error at the beginning of
that same paragraph, where "_Va!_ as interjection
or adverb" should have _Vá!_ instead of _Va!_.