845Re: Haywards, and an uzu
- Nov 6, 2005Fredrik wrote:
> I might point out a possible misprint in this context.No, I don't think so. Too many details have passed by now to be sure,
> On p. 655, entry for Hob Hayward, there is a reference
> to a "note for p. 107". However, Hob Hayward is not
> mentioned in the notes for page 107 (although the Hay
> Gate is, as correctly noted in the next entry on page
> 655 in the _Reader's Companion_). Possibly the
> reference should read "(See also note for p. 10.)",
> referring to the note for "haywards"?
but I think that we meant to point to the mention of the Hay Gate. If
we had meant the note for p. 10 we would have picked up on the
duplication of comments on _hayward_ and dealt with it.
> Magnus points out that *_'uzn_ as the singularYes, it was. It should be _uzn_.
> of _'azan_ would fit the pattern of _khuzd_ - _khazad_
> better than _uzu_ does. Could it be that the word was
> misread in the manuscript of the _Nomenclature_?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>