401Re: Possible ON -r derivation?
- Apr 6, 2003Aiya!
Sunday, April 6, 2003, 5:56:18 PM, Carl F . Hostetter wrote:
>> Here we have _-ro_, which is obviously not agentive (because an agentiveCFH> I don't find that obvious. It is not at all unheard of to have "double"
>> ending _-ndo_ present). ...
CFH> suffixes in languages; ...
Yes, you're right. I should have remembered cases like N _badhron_
Namaarie! S.Y., Elenhil Laiquendo [Boris Shapiro]
: nai ilqua eruanna i nee antanin terlinnuva sen · nai erye vartuva :
- << Previous post in topic