204Re: Initial _ly-_ and enclitics
- Aug 14 3:12 PM--- In lambengolmor@y..., "Petri Tikka" <kari.j.tikka@w...> wrote:
> The first reaction to the word _lyenna_ would be that initialPetri, you'll remember I didn't share this opinion. But I have to take
> palatalized Ls would be allowed in Quenya. But I am not quite sure. It
> may be that it is an enclitic of _elyenna_, the initial vowel
> disappearing because of the final vowel in the preceding word.
into consideration new (for me!) material, and now I think you are
right. In XI:363 (it's the Harper Collins paperback) we read about the
"de/le as pronominal elements in the 2nd person". This explains the
Sindarin pronoun _dîn_, btw.
We also read "dj became ly medially in Quenya". I don't think the
"medially" was stressed without any need: Initial dj (or DY in the
Etymologies) did NOT change into _ly_! (cf. V:394, DYEL-, Q _yelma_)
Since the word _lyenna_ obviously is pronominal 2nd person, the
_dj_>_ly_ must have been medial, after some elided vowel, indeed.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>