188Re: [Lambengolmor] Re: _úcarindor_
- Aug 7, 2002On 8/7/02 3:47 AM, "Fredrik" <gwaihir@...> wrote:
> However, I do not think it reasonable to support the hypothesis that thereThat would indeed be unreasonable. But if you mean to imply that that is how
> is an aorist form present in _i úcarer emmen_ by turning the postcard
> upside down and pointing out that Tolkien's marks could be interpreted as
> an _i_.
the interpretation of the marks Tolkien made against _úcarer_ was arrived
out, you are utterly mistaken. Tolkien very often did not dot his "i"s, if
writing with any haste or notationally (as here); and what you see as an
underposed dot can easily be seen as underlining for emphasis or even by way
of querying (another very common practice).
The fact remains that, semantically and syntactically, an aorist verb is by
far the expected form. The fact also remains that Tolkien did either remark
upon (if your reading of the mark is correct) or consider changing (if it is
an "i") the form. Together, these facts far more strongly suggest that
Tolkien at least considered changing _úcarer_ to *_úcarir_, than they do a
past-tense (or any other) interpretation.
I should note as a tangent that it is not an editor/analyst's obligation to
present every _possible_ interpretation or explanation. We often must select
and present only those that seem likeliest to us. Our obligation is only to
avoid misleading our readers into thinking certain what is only tentative.
Hence Pat's use of the word "suggests" when presenting the aorist
| Carl F. Hostetter Aelfwine@... http://www.elvish.org |
| ho bios brachys, he de techne makre. |
| Ars longa, vita brevis. |
| The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne. |
| "I wish life was not so short," he thought. "Languages take |
| such a time, and so do all the things one wants to know about." |
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>