184Re: i and y in Quenya: two phonemes or one?
- Aug 6, 2002Ales Bican wrote:
> I thought about it today: are sounds _i_ (as in _Quendi_) and _y_Hrm... I don't quite like the idea of having a consonant and a vowel
> (as in _Yavanna_) two phonemes or variants of one phoneme in
as one phoneme (but I haven't read Grundzüge, so what do I know ;). I
guess it could be possible however and if one accepts such a view one
might also want to look at /w/ and /u/. I do however have a few
objections to adopting it in this case.
Firstly, others (Hans and Petri I think) have already mentioned that
you'd have to think of diphthongs and the palatalised consonants as
separate phonemes in order for such a view to work. Whether one
prefers /Cy/ together with /i/ or /C/+/y/ with /i/ and /y/ seems like
a matter of choice but a choice does seem necessary.
Secondly, I think I might have found a (admittedly single) possible
minimal pair distinguishing them, namely _heruion_ (IX, p291) meaning
"of lords" and an unattested but probably possible word _heru-yon_,
"lord-son". Now, _heru-yon_ is unattested and would in all
probability be seen as quite archaic (yondo being the standard form)
but I would still say it's a possible Quenya word. I here think that
the /i/ in _heruion_ is syllabic while the /y/ in _heru-yon_ is not
so the difference in meaning would come across.
Now, this is not a good minimal pair, I know. In part because one of
its constituents is made up by me, in part because they differ in the
position of the stress as well. But I do think _heru-yon_ is a
possible Quenya word, even if _heru-yondo_ or _heruion_ (with the
patronymic -ion suffix) would be more probable. And the difference in
stress lacks importance in this case since stress in Quenya does not
carry any information (is not phonemic), correct?
On the other hand, I'm a physics undergrad, not a linguist, so all of
the above might just be (and probably is) nonsense. Anyway,
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>