Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Oppose National ID Card As Part Of Immigration Reform! (Draft)

Expand Messages
  • borderactions
    ** If your group wanst to sign on to this letter, please send an email to _cyberprivacyproject@hotmail.com_ (mailto:cyberprivacyproject@hotmail.com) and
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 18, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      ** If your group wanst to sign on to this letter, please send an email to
      _cyberprivacyproject@..._ (mailto:cyberprivacyproject@...)
      and _michaeldostrolenk@..._ (mailto:michaeldostrolenk@...)
      DRAFT 2/11/13
      Re: Immigration Reform that Does Not Deform Citizenship and Basic Rights
      Dear President/Senator/Representative:

      The U.S. needs workable and suitable immigration policies that address
      both authorized and unauthorized immigration in sensible ways. A reliable
      immigration program will strengthen American society and the American economy,
      but will also respect the rights of American citizens and those aspiring to
      become citizens. Any immigration “reform” plan that infringes on the
      civil rights and civil liberties of U.S. citizens and non-citizens, especially
      one that implements a biometric national identification card and universal
      electronic verification system, is not reform and violates the fundamental
      rights of a free society.
      A. The Damage of the overly “Comprehensive” Scheme
      We support immigration reform, but oppose certain “comprehensive” parts
      because they degrade the rights of American citizenship by creating an
      intrusive national ID and work permission system. Worker IDs and electronic
      verification depend on the government’s ability to remove a citizens’ right to
      seek and take employment and then ”give it back” as a privilege. That
      privilege is then only granted by the government when the citizen provides
      proper “proof.” Under schemes like federal biometric worker IDs and
      universal electronic “verification,” before a U.S. citizen or a legal
      immigrant could seek or take employment, he would be required to obtain a high-tech
      Worker/Social Security card embedded with biometric identifiers (like
      fingerprints). The card would then be checked against a national databank for
      “eligibility” to work. Under such schemes the long standing fundamental
      right to take employment becomes government-granted privilege alterable by
      government fiat at any time. Even worse, the mechanisms for both the
      issuance and verification of cards will be controlled by the government. If a
      citizen does not have this single official card, even if she had a passport,
      she cannot work.
      B. Citizens’ Right to Employment
      The right to employment has long been a fundamental feature of American
      citizenship. Since Butcher Union Co. v. Crescent City Co. in 1884, the U.S.
      Supreme Court has held that
      The right to follow any of the common occupations of life is an
      inalienable right; it was formulated as such under the phrase ‘pursuit of happiness'
      in the declaration of independence… This right is a large ingredient in the
      civil liberty of the citizen.”[1]


      A government requirement that a citizen must provide proof of
      citizenship to work not only undermines one’s fundamental right to employment, but it
      also violates the principle that government is required to facilitate
      basic freedoms. In other words, the burden is on the government to prove that
      the individual cannot work here. Otherwise, citizenship in a democracy is
      upended from its proper relationship of consent from the citizen to the
      state to one in which the state gives or withholds permission on its terms and
      makes the right to seek and take employment into a conditional
      privilege.[2] The situation becomes worse when the only allowed forms of proof are
      government-issued or government-controlled. Both the “privilege” to work
      and the mechanism for enjoying the privilege lies within the government’s
      grip.
      Worker ID and universal e-verification systems presume no one is a
      citizen. They assume no one (a citizen or otherwise) can work in the U.S. until
      she proves she has the privilege. Any American who does not have or provide “
      proper “government-issued documentation become “an illegal” and will not
      be allowed to take a job.
      C. CIR and Biometric Citizen Green Cards
      A biometric ID card also violates privacy because the government “captures”
      private pieces of persons for official purposes. As John Locke said in
      Two Treatises of Government, “every man has a Property in his own Person."
      The Thirteenth Amendment recognizes everyone’s rights over her own body and
      freedom. A biometric ID tied to a government-owned database extracts, marks,
      and takes “ownership” over individuals’ fingerprints or digital images.
      Such a card will likely say “property of the U.S. government,” even though
      citizens, persons, rights and information cannot “belong” to a democratic
      state.
      The worker ID and electronic employment verification system (E-Verify)
      equate citizens with illegal immigrants and require citizens to be
      fingerprinted like criminals and to carry the equivalent of “green cards.” Instead of
      legal immigrants being freed from mandatory green cards once they become
      citizens, under “Comprehensive” Immigration Reform, citizens will have to
      carry worker cards that contain information about their bodies. If a citizen’
      s ID cannot be verified because the card itself has stopped working or
      because a government databank is faulty, he cannot work. Quite simply, Worker
      ID-with-E-Verify will be a National ID System—not just paper forms kept
      locally, but an integrated, constant, comprehensive tracking and privileging
      system of all employees and their work.
      Uses of the Worker ID will proliferate. Like the Social Security card
      that once said “not for identification purposes,” a biometric worker card
      will become required everywhere for identification. Unlike the driver’s license
      that once proved people knew how to drive, Worker IDs will become “travel
      licenses” required for “federal purposes” like entering government
      buildings or flying on airplanes (which are now possible without ID.) Also, worker
      IDs connected to E-Verify will leave a “digital trail” for tracking
      everybody’s whereabouts 24/7. By tracking where everyone is officials can tell
      them where they can and cannot work or go.
      D. The Costs of a Worker ID
      While lost employment rights and privacy invasions are worker
      ID system’s greatest costs, such programs will also burden citizens with
      significant cash expenses. Like the costs of “free” voter IDs, many
      citizens will lose work time and income to get certified birth certificates and
      travel to government offices rather than earning money. A “comprehensive”
      worker ID system will cost taxpayers and businesses billions of dollars.
      Small to large companies fighting the recession will face machine and time
      expenses for e-verifying all workers and IDs. CIR will further draft business
      owners as unpaid federal immigration agents. It could require families to
      buy equipment to E-Verify babysitters and elder caregivers.
      Tied to a Worker ID, an expensive E-Verify program could push some
      employers and workers toward the black market and avoiding taxes, losing $17
      billion in government revenues a decade. Fully implementing E-Verify will cost
      employers, employees and households over $6 billion.[3] E-Verify will be
      infamous for database mistakes that keep citizens out of work and in limbo
      (1% errors make 2 million unemployed),[4] and worthless when employers don’t
      check it. It will also be valuable to hackers accessing the databases for
      identity theft.
      E. Concluding against Worker ID and E-verification in CIR
      In short, these “comprehensive” parts of immigration reform undermine
      citizens’ rights to employment and privacy at high costs. “Capturing” and
      storing fingerprint and facial images in a national database for universal
      e-verification eviscerate citizenship, invade privacy and invite identity
      theft. A biometric worker ID-With-E-Verify becomes a national ID and tracking
      scheme. It imposes burdens on rights and revenues. CIR’s collateral damage
      injures citizens and citizenship. Worker ID/E-Verify won’t work and are
      misleading diversions from valid immigration proposals. Immigration officials
      must not have power over citizens.
      Because citizen freedoms are foundations for upholding rights for all
      persons, in “constitutional citizenship theory itself, citizenship is not just
      for citizens.”[5] Protecting the citizen right to employment helps everyone
      who wants to contribute to prosperity and become citizens here by
      maintaining citizenship as bedrock of freedoms. It keeps American citizenship as
      the gold standard, rather than a tarnished dream, for Americans and those
      seeking to enter America’s Golden Door.
      Plans for E-verify and Worker IDs as All-American “green cards”
      in a National ID system need to be dropped. Real reforms, like expanding
      legal immigration, fair legalization, dream acts, and viable guest worker
      options,[6] do not deform citizenship and basic rights. The U.S. deserves
      Constitutional Immigration Reform that fosters productive immigration and
      economic development. We do not need worker IDs or E-Verify schemes that
      destroy the rights of American citizens and those aspiring to join them.
      Sincerely,


      ____________________________________
      [1] Truax v. Raich (1915) and Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) hold “The
      right to work for a living in the common occupations of the community is of
      the very essence of the personal freedom and opportunity that it was the
      purpose of the [Fourteenth] Amendment to secure.”
      [2] Richard Sobel, “Citizenship as Foundation,” TriQuarterly, 2008.
      [3] _www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=38990_
      (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=38990) . CBO letter,
      _www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc/91xx/doc9100/hr4088ltr.pdf_ (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc/91xx/doc9100/hr4088ltr.pdf) .
      .
      [4] Westat, “Findings of the E-Verify Program Evaluation,” December 2009.
      [5] Linda Bosniak, The Citizen and the Alien, 2006, 79.

      [6] Douglas Massey and Karen Pren, “Unintended Consequences of US
      Immigration Policy,” Population & Development Review, March 2012.



      Constitutional Alliance
      Cyber Privacy Project
      Defending Dissent Foundation
      Liberty Coalition



      Privacy Journal
      Stop Real ID Coalition
      Taxpayers Protection Alliance
      It's also circulating to other contacts.












      ============================================================================
      ==

      National Immigrant Solidarity Network
      No Immigrant Bashing! Support Immigrant Rights!
      webpage: _http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org_
      (http://www.immigrantsolidarity.org/)
      e-mail: _info@..._
      (mailto:infor@...)

      New York: (212)330-8172
      Los Angeles: (213)403-0131
      Washington D.C.: (202)595-8990
      Chicago: (773)942-2268


      * join the immigrant Solidarity Network daily news litserv, send e-mail
      to: isn-subscribe@...


      Please consider making a donation to the important work of National
      Immigrant Solidarity Network

      Send check pay to:
      National Immigrant Solidarity Network/AFGJ

      National Immigrant Solidarity Network
      P.O. Box 751
      South Pasadena, CA 91031-0751
      (All donations are tax deductible)


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.