Re: [LAAMN] Democrats push for ban of assault over Sandy Hook, but stay silent on nuclear power after Fukushima
- Yup, the hypocrisy of the psychopaths. They will say ANYTHING to get YOU
AND I to co-opt into mass suffering and murder of anyone not benefiting
their bottom line. This is how you make money from blood and death.
One potential disaster is profitable for several international types of
corporations, who are dependent on government legislation to ensure their
profits, the other isn't.
Now if we can bomb nukes in foreign lands that have 21st century natural
resources, and hit a mess of schools and hospitals as collateral damage,
that wouldn't raise any out cry from our government either.
In fact, we'd have been forced to do it to them.
> Democrats push for ban of assault weapons over Sandy Hook, but stay silent
> nuclear power after Fukushima by Lori Price, www.legitgov.org 20 Dec 2012
> Democrats want to implement a ban on military-style assault weapons in the
> aftermath of the Sandy Hook shootings. Several lawmakers and liberal
> assert that certain guns--by their very existence--are a threat to human
> Well. Why no similar outcry demanding an end to nuclear power--after four
> nuclear plant meltdowns at Fukushima? Nuclear power plants, history has
> shown--by their very existence--are a threat to human life. In fact,
> Barack Obama sent officials to Japan to ensure that the Japanese
> would continue to build new plants. There was no 'wall-to-wall' media
> as the disasters unfolded at Fukushima, unlike the commercial-free
> coverage of
> the events that transpired at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Surely,
> cancer will kill far more than the twenty children who were among the
> who perished in Newtown, Connecticut. Yes, Sandy Hook was a 'mindless,
> senseless' tragedy. Ditto the Obama Administration's unabated--albeit
> hushed, so
> as not to offend the 'Left'--love affair with nuclear power and its Wall
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]