Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Juan Cole: America Is Filling the World With Guns

Expand Messages
  • Ed Pearl
    http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/416-gun-control-/15084-america-is-fi lling-the-world-with-guns America Is Filling the World With Guns By Juan Cole,
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 18 11:03 AM

      America Is Filling the World With Guns

      By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

      Reader Supported News: 17 December 12

      <http://readersupportednews.org/images/stories/alphabet/rsn-T.jpg> he
      American obsession with guns and violence is not unique, but it is
      distinctive. The US ranks 12th in the world for rate of firearm-related
      deaths. El Salvador, Colombia, Swaziland, Brazil, South Africa, the
      Philippines and some others are worse. But that is the company the US is in-
      not, say, relatively peaceful places like Japan, Singapore and the

      It turns out that the Newtown shooter used a semi-automatic Bushmaster rifle
      8.html> and he had lots of thirty-round high-capacity clips for it.
      Authorities have revealed that each of the 20 children and six adults he
      killed was shot multiple times, but given the number of clips Lanza brought
      with him, the number of victims could have been much, much higher. The
      Federal ban on weapons such as the Bushmaster, in place 1994-2004, was
      allowed to lapse by the George W. Bush administration and his Republican
      Congress, all of whom received massive campaign donations from the gun
      lobby. There is a Connecticut ban, but the maker of the Bushmaster used a
      loophole in the poorly written state law to continue to sell the gun in the
      state. The Bushmaster is manufactured by a subsidiary of the Wall Street
      hedge fund, Cerberus Capital Management, called the "Freedom Group"- which
      also owns Remington and DPMS Firearms. It is the largest single maker of
      semi-automatic rifles in the US, and they are expected to be a major growing
      profit center in the coming years. The Freedom Group was sued over the
      Washington, DC, sniper attacks, and paid $500,000 without admitting

      So, the hedge funds are doing us in every which way.

      But the weird idea of letting people buy military weaponry at will, with
      less trouble than you would have to buy a car, is only one manifestation of
      America's cult of high-powered weaponry.

      In 2011, US corporations sold 75% of all the arms sold in the international
      ach-66-3-billion-in-2011.html?_r=0> weapons market, some $66 billion of the
      $85 billion trade. Russia was the runner-up with only $4 billion in sales.

      Saudi Arabia bought F-15s and Apache and Blackhawk helicopters. Oman bought
      F-16s. The UAE got a missile shield. And, of course, Israel gets very
      sophisticated weapons from the US, as well.

      The US share of the arms trade to the Middle East has burgeoned so much in
      the past decade that it now dwarfs the other suppliers, as this chart [pdf]
      from <http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R42678.pdf> a Congressional study
      makes clear.


      The University of Michigan "Correlates of War" project, run by my late
      colleague David Singer, tried to crunch numbers on potential causes of the
      wars of the past two centuries. Getting a statistically valid correlation
      for a cause was almost impossible. But there was one promising lead, as it
      was explained to me. When countries made large arms purchases, they seemed
      more likely to go to war in the aftermath. It may be that if you have
      invested in state of the art weapons, you want to use them before they
      become antiquated or before your enemies get them too.

      So the very worst thing the US could do for Middle East peace is to sell the
      region billions in new, sophisticated weapons.

      Moreover if you give sophisticated conventional weapons to some countries
      but deny them to their rivals, the rivals will try to level the playing
      field with unconventional weapons. The US is creating an artificial and
      unnecessary impetus to nuclear proliferation by this policy.

      I first went to Pakistan in 1981. At that time it was not a society with
      either drugs or guns. But President Ronald Reagan decided to use private
      Afghan militias to foment a guerrilla war against the Soviets, who sent
      troops into Afghanistan in late 1979. Reagan ended up sending billions of
      dollars worth of arms to the Mujahidin annually, and twisting Saudi Arabia's
      arm to match what the US sent. The Mujahidin were also encouraged by the US
      to grow poppies for heroin production so that they could buy even more

      Over the decade of the 1980s, I saw the weapons begin to show up in the
      markets of Pakistan, and began hearing for the first time about drug addicts
      (there came to be a million of them by 1990). I had seen the arms market
      expand in Lebanon in the 1970s, and was alarmed that now it was happening in
      Pakistan, at that time a relatively peaceful and secure society. The US
      filled Pakistan up with guns to get at the Soviets, creating a gun culture
      where such a thing had been rare (with the exception of some Pashtuns who
      made home-made knock-offs of Western rifles). Ultimately the gun culture
      promoted by Reagan came back to bite the US on the ass (not to mention
      Afghanistan and Pakistan!) And not to mention the drugs.

      Now the US views Pakistan as peculiarly violent, and pundits often blame it
      on Islamism. But no, it is just garden-variety Americanism. You're welcome.


      No virus found in this message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2634/5956 - Release Date: 12/13/12

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.