Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Amira Hass: Israel's 'Right to Self-defense', Nobel Laureates, other notables call for Arms Boycott

Expand Messages
  • Ed Pearl
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 30, 2012

      Israel's 'right to self-defense' - a tremendous propaganda victory

      By supporting Israel's offensive on Gaza, Western leaders have given the
      Israelis carte blanche to do what they're best at: Wallow in their sense of
      victimhood and ignore Palestinian suffering.

      <http://www.haaretz.com/misc/writers/amira-hass-1.278> Amira Hass
      Haaretz: 04:06 19.11.12 |

      One of Israel's tremendous propaganda victories is that it has been accepted
      as a victim of the Palestinians, both in the view of the Israeli public and
      that of Western leaders who hasten to speak of Israel's right to defend
      itself. The propaganda is so effective that only the Palestinian rockets at
      the south of Israel, and now at Tel Aviv, are counted in the round of
      hostilities. The rockets, or damage to the holiest of holies - a military
      jeep - are always seen as a starting point, and together with the terrifying
      siren, as if taken from a World War II movie, build the meta-narrative of
      the victim entitled to defend itself.

      Every day, indeed every moment, this meta-narrative allows Israel to add
      another link to the chain of dispossession of a nation as old as the state
      itself, while at the same time managing to hide the fact that one continuous
      thread runs from the 1948 refusal to allow Palestinian refugees to return to
      their homes, the early 1950s expulsion of Bedouin from the Negev desert, the
      current expulsion of Bedouin from the Jordan Valley, ranches for Jews in the
      Negev, discrimination in budgets in Israel, and shooting at Gazan fishermen
      to keep them from earning a respectable living. Millions of such continuous
      threads link 1948 to the present. They are the fabric of life for the
      Palestinian nation, as divided as it may be in isolated pockets. They are
      the fabric of life of Palestinian citizens of Israel and of those who live
      in their lands of exile.

      But these threads are not the entire fabric of life. The resistance to the
      threads that we, the Israelis, endlessly spin is also part of the fabric of
      life for Palestinians. The word resistance has been debased to mean the very
      masculine competition of whose missile will explode furthest away (a
      competition among Palestinian organizations, and between them and the
      established Israeli army). It does not invalidate the fact that, in essence,
      resistance to the injustice inherent in Israeli domination is an inseparable
      part of life for each and every Palestinian.

      The foreign and international development ministries in the West and in the
      United States knowingly collaborate with the mendacious representation of
      Israel as victim, if only because every week they receive reports from their
      representatives in the West Bank and Gaza Strip about yet another link of
      dispossession and oppression that Israel has added to the chain, or
      because their own taxpayers' money make up for some of the humanitarian
      disasters, large and small, inflicted by Israel.

      On November 8, two days before the attack on the holiest of holies -
      soldiers in a military jeep - they could have read about IDF soldiers
      killing 13-year old Ahmad Abu Daqqa, who was playing soccer with his friends
      in the village of Abassan, east of Khan Yunis. The soldiers were 1.5
      kilometers from the kids, inside the Gaza Strip area, busy with "exposing"
      (a whitewashed word for destroying ) agricultural land. So why shouldn't the
      count of aggression start with a child? On November 10, after the attack on
      the jeep, the IDF killed another four civilians, aged 16 to 19.

      Wallowing in ignorance

      Leaders of the West could have known that, before the IDF's exercise last
      week in the Jordan Valley, dozens of Bedouin families were told to evacuate
      their homes. How extraordinary that IDF training always occurs where Bedouin
      live, not Israeli settlers, and that it constitutes a reason to expel them.
      Another reason. Another expulsion. The leaders of the West could also have
      known, based on the full-color, chrome-paper reports their countries
      finance, that since the beginning of 2012, Israel has destroyed
      569 Palestinian buildings and structures, including wells and 178
      residences. In all, 1,014 people were affected by those demolitions.

      We haven't heard masses of Tel Aviv and southern residents warning the
      stewards of the state about the ramifications of this destruction on the
      civilian population. The Israelis cheerfully wallow in their ignorance.
      This information and other similar facts are available and accessible to
      anyone who's really interested. But Israelis choose not to know. This willed
      ignorance is a foundation stone in the building of Israel's sense of
      victimization. But ignorance is ignorance: The fact that Israelis don't want
      to know what they are doing as an occupying power doesn't negate their deeds
      or Palestinian resistance.

      In 1993, the Palestinians gave Israel a gift, a golden opportunity to cut
      the threads tying 1948 to the present, to abandon the country's
      characteristics of colonial dispossession, and together plan a different
      future for the two peoples in the region. The Palestinian generation that
      accepted the Oslo Accords (full of traps laid by smart Israeli lawyers) is
      the generation that got to know a multifaceted, even normal, Israeli society
      because the 1967 occupation allowed it (for the purpose of supplying cheap
      labor) almost full freedom of movement. The Palestinians agreed to a
      settlement based on their minimum demands. One of the pillars
      of these minimum demands was treating the Gaza Strip and West Bank as a
      single territorial entity.

      But once the implementation of Oslo started, Israel systematically did
      everything it could to make the Gaza Strip into a separate, disconnected
      entity, as part of Israel's insistence on maintaining the threads of 1948
      and extending them. Since the rise of Hamas, it has done everything to
      backup the impression Hamas prefers - that the Gaza Strip is a separate
      political entity where there is no occupation. If that is so, why not look
      at things as follows: As a separate political entity, any incursion into
      Gazan territory is an infringement of its sovereignty, and Israel does this
      all the time. Does the government of the state of Gaza not have the right to
      respond, to deter, or at least the masculine right - a twin of the IDF's
      masculine right - to scare the Israelis just as Israel scares the

      But Gaza is not a state. Gaza is under Israeli occupation, despite all the
      verbal acrobatics of both Hamas and Israel. The Palestinians who live there
      are part of a people whose DNA contains resistance to oppression.

      In the West Bank, Palestinian activists try to develop a type of resistance
      different from the masculine, armed resistance. But the IDF puts down all
      popular resistance with zeal and resolve. We haven't heard of residents of
      Tel Aviv and the south complaining about the balance of deterrence the IDF
      is building against the civilian Palestinian population.

      And so Israel again provides reasons for more young Palestinians, for whom
      Israel is an abnormal society of army and settlers, to conclude that the
      only rational resistance is spilled blood and counter-terrorizing. And so
      every Israeli link of oppression and all Israeli disregard of the
      oppression's existence drags us further down the slope of masculine

      * * *


      Nobel peace laureates call for Israel military boycott over Gaza assault

      Letter with 52 signatories including artists and activists also denounces US
      and EU 'complicity' through weapons sales

      Chris McGreal <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/chrismcgreal> in Jerusalem

      guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/> , Wednesday 28 November 2012
      05.34 EST

      A group of Nobel peace prize-winners, prominent artists and activists have
      issued a call for an international military boycott of Israel
      <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/israel> following its assault on the Gaza
      <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gaza> Strip this month.

      The letter also denounces the US, EU and several developing countries for
      what it describes as their "complicity" through weapons sales and other
      military support in the attack that killed 160 Palestinians, many of them
      civilians, including about 35 children.

      The 52 signatories include the Nobel peace laureates Mairead Maguire and
      Adolfo Pérez Esquivel; the film directors Mike Leigh and Ken Loach; the
      author Alice Walker; the US academic Noam Chomsky; Roger Waters of Pink
      Floyd; and Stéphane Hessel, a former French diplomat and Holocaust survivor
      who was co-author of the universal declaration of human rights.

      "Horrified at the latest round of Israeli aggression against the 1.5 million
      Palestinians in the besieged and occupied Gaza Strip and conscious of the
      impunity that has enabled this new chapter in Israel's decades-old
      violations of international law and Palestinian rights, we believe there is
      an urgent need for international action towards a mandatory, comprehensive
      military embargo against Israel," the letter says.


      No virus found in this message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2629/5923 - Release Date: 11/27/12

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.