Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

NPR Interview: New "Top Two" Election System Causes Problems For Smaller Political Parties

Expand Messages
  • Mike Feinstein
    http://www.kvpr.org/post/new-top-two-election-system-causes-problems-smaller-political-parties New Top Two Election System Causes Problems For Smaller
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 30, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      http://www.kvpr.org/post/new-top-two-election-system-causes-problems-smaller-political-parties

      New "Top Two" Election System Causes Problems For Smaller Political
      Parties

      By Joe Moore
      Editor's note: This is the second in a two-part series on the impact
      of California's new top-two election reform.

      When California voters approved Proposition 14 in 2010, supporters
      hailed it as a way to make many races for Congress, the Legislature
      and state offices more competitive, thanks to a new top-two election
      system.

      But now, with the first full election cycle under the new process
      complete, some are worried that this effort at reform could also lead
      to the demise of some of the state's smaller political parties, even
      possibly stripping them of their eligibility to appear on future
      primary ballots.

      "This reform specifically hurts third parties," says Eric McGhee of
      the non-partisan Public Policy Institute of California. That's because
      the new system effectively makes it much harder to reach the
      thresholds needed to qualify for a political party for the ballot.

      "The way that parties actually become qualified for the ballot in the
      first place, even to run in the primary, is based on their showing in
      previous elections," says McGhee.

      And specifically previous general elections. The same ones that under
      the reforms of Proposition 14, now only feature two candidates, the
      top-two vote-getters from the primary election.

      "The opportunity for minor parties to do that [make the general
      election ballot] in the new top-two scheme is much more limited," says
      Kim Alexander of the non-profit California Voter Foundation.

      In fact, in the November, election just three candidates from the so-
      called minor parties, and five no-party preference candidates made it
      to the general election ballot.

      Part of the problem, according to Alexander involves the legislation
      that was needed to implement Prop 14, after it was approved by voters.

      "Prop 14 was drafted pretty quickly. It's important to remember that
      it was a last minute bill that was put on the ballot in 2010, and it
      was not crafted that thoughtfully. And in fact, it required major
      cleanup legislation the following year to make it ready to actually be
      implemented," says Alexander.

      So exactly how does a political party qualify, or remain qualified for
      the ballot? And what about those changes made by the Legislature that
      supposedly hurt third parties? We asked Keith Smith, professor of
      political science at the University of the Pacific in Stockton. It
      turns out there's actually three ways for a political party to qualify.

      "The first one is that a party has to get two percent of the vote in a
      statewide constitutional office. For example, governor, lieutenant
      governor, insurance commissioner, one of the party's nominees has to
      get two percent of the final vote. For the minor parties, that option
      is basically gone," says Smith.

      That's important because as Smith says, "the four minor parties that
      are there all got at least two percent of the vote for insurance
      commissioner in 2010."

      The numbers are based on the vote in last gubernatorial election, in
      this case, 2010. So after the next election for governor, which will
      take place in 2014, it's highly unlikely that the state's smaller
      parties will qualify in this manner.

      "The second way that they can be qualified is if they register
      partisans totaling one percent of the gubernatorial vote in the last
      election," says Smith. "And in looking at the 15-day registration
      statistics, the American Independent, the Libertarian and the Green
      Party now have one percent of the gubernatorial vote registered as
      members of their party. The Peace and Freedom Party does not. The
      Peace and Freedom party is about about 50,000 people away from having
      one percent of the gubernatorial vote in 2010."

      That means if all else stays the same, after the 2014 election,
      according to Smith, "candidates won't be able to affiliate with the
      Peace and Freedom Party anymore because they won't be qualified." And
      if the other parties fail to maintain their voter registration
      numbers, they could fall off the ballot as well.

      This provision also hurts third parties because in many cases, a lot
      of people, who in the past voted for a third party candidate in the
      general election, were actually registered with another party. For
      example, a Democrat voting for a Green Party candidate, or a
      Republican voting for a Libertarian.


      "It's harder to get people to register in your party if you're never
      on the ballot," - Michael Feinstein, Green Party of California

      And Michael Feinstein, spokesperson for the Green Party of California
      says the top two system makes the voter registration option even more
      difficult, because historically many voters tend to stay home for the
      primary, and only come out in big numbers for the general election.

      "It's harder to get people to register in your party if you're never
      on the ballot," says Feinstein.

      That leaves parties one last option to make it on the ballot, a very
      expensive one, petitions.

      "The third way that you can be a qualified political party is if you
      gather petitions equaling ten percent of the gubernatorial vote," says
      Smith."And that's a higher threshold than getting a ballot initiative
      or a constitutional ballot initiative qualified. And this is how
      Americans Elect got on the ballot. They paid to have signature
      gatherers get ten percent of the registrant population to say 'yeah,
      we should have Americans Elect on the ballot.'"

      So, the last option is very expensive, and the first option highly
      unlikely, leaving Libertarians and Greens only the voter registration
      option as a way of stay on the ballot and off the unqualified list,
      which is populated by such well known political voices as the
      California Pirate Party and the We Like Women Party.

      But the challenges for third parties don't stop there. The Legislature
      also raised the fees and requirements for candidates themselves to get
      on the ballot. Smith says that in the November election that made some
      candidates stay away, and choose not to run.

      "Even small changes in filing fees or signature requirements can
      significant drive down the number of third party candidates," says
      Smith.

      Michael Feinstein of the Green Party says he thinks it's part of an
      effort by Democrats and Republicans to keep third parties off the
      ballot.

      "It used to be that we needed 60 signatures for a state assembly race
      in lieu of paying a filing fee. Now we need 1,500. We used to need 150
      for governor, now we need 10,000. So on every level, this is designed
      to reduce voice and options for the California voter," says Feinstein.

      The final major change as part of the top-two system removed one other
      option from the general election, write-in candidates. And that too
      doesn't go over well with Feinstein.

      "When you think back to the state of Alaska a couple of years ago,
      when Lisa Murkowsky, the Republican incumbent lost the primary to a
      Tea Party faction candidate, and then she ran in the general election
      as a write-in [candidate] in the general and was elected. We no longer
      have that option [in California] and instead the system just renders a
      false majority," says Feinstein.

      So what might the future hold for third parties in California and the
      new election reforms? Feinstein says he thinks that the courts will
      overturn Prop 14 and related laws for presenting what he calls
      "unconstitutionally high barriers to participation in the general
      election." And even supporters like Kim Alexander advocate making
      changes to reduce the effects on California's smaller parties.

      "I hope the legislature revisits the impact that the top-two primary
      system is having on minor parties in California. They are an important
      part of our electoral landscape," says Alexander. "There are a lot of
      Californians who feel that neither of the major parties represent
      their interests, and we don't want them to feel like there's no place
      for them to go. So we really need to have a system that enables third
      parties to have a presence in the California political process."


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.