Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Some thoughts on Obama: A stunning defeat for racists, patriarchs, exploiters, homophobes and blowhards

Expand Messages
  • Ed Pearl
    From: Alan Gilbert Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 11:08 PM To: democratic-indv@du.edu Some
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 9, 2012
      From: Alan Gilbert
      Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 11:08 PM
      To: democratic-indv@...

      -stunning-defeat.html> thoughts on Obama: A stunning defeat for racists,
      patriarchs, exploiters, homophobes and blowhards

      I am - and most people I know are - enormously relieved and thrilled at
      Obama's victory. These are some thoughts about it.


      Bill O'Reilly spoke of the defeat of "traditional America" a "white
      America." He spoke of the latinos as well as blacks who voted for Obama as
      just wanting "stuff."

      This is a standard pseudo-tea-party line (the Boston Tea party was an
      integrated revolutionary crowd.). It is wrong in three ways. First, no "tea
      party" advocate refuses social security, medicare or veterans benefits.
      "Keep the government's hands off my social security" was an early tea-party
      sign which captures the racist ninnie-dom of its aging, not to say doddering
      "white" advocates.

      That slogan is, of course, against the interests of people who believe it.
      Fortunately, in Ohio, many working class white people didn't (even in the
      South, I suspect, a lot of poorer white people didn't). And fortunately,
      fewer unmarried white women - a growing per cent of voters - and married
      white women didn't.

      Second, nobody gets bigger breaks or more "welfare" from the government than
      billionaires. They get special deals so they can hide their profits overseas
      from taxation. They get special tax incentives so the Romneys pay a lower
      tax rate, if any, on their multimillions than any of the people who clean up
      their many mansions.

      Third, the executives at Goldman Sachs, AIG and Bain, for example, make
      money largely through speculation and gutting other people's jobs. They are
      literally parasites or speculators - the creatures of "derivatives" and
      "credit default swaps" - who produce nothing and wrecked the world economy
      to boot.

      There is another category of capitalists who produce something (Apple being
      a leading example). At their plant in China (Foxconn), however, 14 workers
      threw themselves off the roof this summer...

      There is thus exploitation of people who actually work, physically, hard, at
      little pay, under coercion, often in despair, in the production of bright
      i-phones and computers. Many ordinary Americans are among their number.

      Bill O'Reilly is a blowhard who speaks of others who want "stuff" and gets
      paid a lot of money for doing very little. His claims are projection,
      psychologically speaking. For the takers and I mean particularly categories
      two and three above, rich people, capitalists, bankers (some of whom have
      some self-possession and decency, but unfortunately not many), what they say
      of others is who they are.

      It was their defeat. It was earned.


      John Nichols emphasized this morning on Democracy Now that Obama's victory,
      likely to be over 3 million votes, was decisive. It was a bigger victory
      than that of JFK, Nixon, Carter or W in either term. Remember W's preening
      agenda - made possible only by the corporate media - to spend his "political
      capital" by stealing social security.

      Obama needs to push decent immigration reform. Legalizing the immigrants who
      are exploited here, some 11 or more million people, will further shift the
      electorate over time - move further toward decency - and force the
      "Republican" party or some successor to stop being the party of bigotry and
      pseudo-Israeli, pseudo-Berlin "walls" against the world.

      As Hurricane Sandy and the Colorado fires this spring underline, the oceans
      are warming. There is structural causality of climate change, the rising sea
      levels or increasing droughts - as well as particular causes - to the
      increasing dangers of nature. Obama needs to act on this.

      But Obama will not act on anything without pressure from below. So we need
      to push hard on these things.


      Presidential campaigns are always a spectacle. The attention and energy of
      millions of people is absorbed in them. Doing something about politics from
      below - as in the social movements like Occupy which made Obama a decent
      candidate - are temporarily weakened, go by the board. Yet see the bracing
      efforts of people on Occupy in flooded New York below.


      After the election, even in victory, people are tired or need to have a
      life, get back to work.

      So fighting for what needs to be done becomes, in this way, more difficult,


      In his victory speech, Obama spoke of what is supposedly exceptional in
      America. This is partly true and partly just a de rigeuer politician's


      America has supported and is the biggest arms seller to oppressors abroad.
      We need a campaign to awaken Americans to the plight of the Palestinians -
      inside and outside the Occupied territories - by the state of Israel. We
      need a decent two state solution or a one state solution with human rights
      for all.

      But Israel plays a destructive flaunter of international law role in the
      world as well as in American politics, as the Netanyahu-Romney couple
      showed. This needs to be stopped. See here
      <http://democratic-individuality.blogspot.com/2012/10/song-is-hope.html> ,
      all.html> , here
      every-friday.html> , here
      <http://democratic-individuality.blogspot.com/2012/10/poem-mood.html> , here
      rees.html> , here
      ml> , here
      oys.html> , here
      58-of-israeli.html> , here
      -putnam-women-and.html> and here
      om-below.html> .

      The settlements need to be challenged and reversed (or integrated - might be
      nice to trade some of the $3 billion military aid, not just to move settlers
      back to Israel, but to move Palestinians in...).

      As the civil rights delegation of which I was a part saw, it will take a
      determined anti-aparteid movement from below to change this.


      Unlike other Presidents running for reelection, Obama did not bomb Iran or
      support Israeli aggression during the campaign (see my Must Global Politics
      Constrain Democracy?, ch. 1). But the dangers of American/Israeli
      aggression, too, will take a movement from below to head off.


      That Obama, as an able African-American and mixed race candidate, weathered
      this storm - won despite 8% unemployment (15% in real terms, counting those
      who have given up looking for work or have part-time and would jump at full
      time jobs) and racism - the heart of the Romney campaign - is startling. The
      so-called Republican party (the imperial authoritarian party) has been the
      party of sabotage, of voting no to defeat Obama regardless of a common good.

      That was what made Chris Christie's behavior in the storm, along with
      Obama's, exemplary. The Republicans, as Norm Ornstein of the American
      Enterprise Institute, has rightly argued recently, are the zealous party of
      "no" at the expense of a common good, buoyed only by money, lies, the bought
      press, and of course, the fantasies and fears of many ordinary people.

      It comes from what Obama said - standing for opportunity and decency for all
      Americans, inviting all into the community and from, for the most part,
      extremely able campaigning. The campaigning is, as the Presidency, during
      Hurricane Sandy, mainly efficient, doing competently what one might expect
      someone to do though candidates/politicians often don't, and also inventive.

      Most Americans want decency and opportunity for themselves and their
      familieis, and see that this is something that needs extension to others.
      And Americans are tired of imperial aggressions.


      The Obama campaigns have been memorable for finding many new to politics,
      lost or forgotten or overlooked, reaching out to them, enabling them to
      mobilize. Their method reveals a new model of skill in figuring out how to
      mobilize the vote. Here
      gn-staff-after> Obama says some interesting things about himself and to his
      campaign workers about what they mean to him and about their future. It is
      pretty good.

      The Republicans might catch up technically. But they don't have the politics
      to reach voters - "white" land is not a place so many of us want to be. And
      of course, the spirit that mark the Obama campaigns is absent. Nonetheless,
      it is only if they and the whole spectrum shifts now to the center (or
      "left" in American terms) that they will be likely to win national


      Was Obama a favorite against Hilary Clinton? Against McCain (it took two
      losing wars and a financial collapse)? Against Romney?

      Not a chance.

      In terms of ability, this is a once in a lifetime candidate (team) and


      The economy seems to be picking up. Bill Clinton worried that Romney might -
      if austerity and cutting the throats of poor people who actually spend the
      money they earn in America and thus exert a multiplier impact on growth
      (their buying leads to the employment of others who provide them goods) -
      reap the benefits. He won't.

      But the depression may continue. Obama needs to fight for genuine programs
      for jobs and using federal moneys to prevent state layoffs of teachers and
      other public workers.
      Whether American capitalism can provide full employment at decent wages -
      even with a new burst for the green economy - remains to be fought for and,
      less likely, seen.


      The movement that brought Obama back to power is not the reality of power in
      Imperial Washington. The rich, as Barack says, always have a place at the
      table, the militarists (a trillion dollar war complex) much more.


      Obama's speech in Iowa was a bit wistful, looking back on campaigning. His
      victory speech was generous and large, looking to, once again, lift everyone

      It was what he had been cautioned against - given the depression - in
      campaigning. But it is much more who Barack Obama is.

      One could hear the relief in his voice as well. It was no certain victory,
      particularly after the stylistic debacle in Denver. He could have been the
      one-term African-American president, the results largely erased.

      The forces of racism were mobilized against him, baying behind Romney.
      Listen again to O'Reilly.

      He mobilized the people to overcome them.

      We overcame them. I join with everyone else in the feeling of relief and
      being thrilled by his reemergence as someone with a broader and decent
      vision for America.


      But Obama is, again, the leader of the empire. If one expects too much from
      him or the Democrats, one is likely to be disappointed.

      Obama is still the man of drones, every one he fires a war crime. As
      Democratic neo-neo cons blither, he kills less civilians than in
      neocon-Bush-Cheney-would-be Romney aggressions. He kills many.

      He is making new enemies in Pakistan daily - those who hate us because the
      American President murders children and other innocents - for the United


      Obama is still the man of state secrets. The Canadian government can pay
      damages to Maher Arar, the Syrian-Canadian engineer kidnapped by Bush from
      Laguardia and sent to be tortured in a coffin like cell in Syria, released
      when the Syrian authorities told the US monsters that he knew nothing). But
      Obama's government will not allow him to sue for damages in the United
      States. The "Courts," too, squeak "state secrets."


      There will be no hearings about torture. American war criminals like Richard
      Cheney and Condoleeza Rice strut around - inside the United States. But they
      and Bush can not go abroad (except for Bush's recent visit, carefully
      planned, well guarded, to the Cayman islands to speak to the rich on how
      exploiters can shift their gains to avoid taxation.)


      The victories of Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Baldwin and the "amazons," as
      Rachel Maddow put it, in New Hampshire are a heartening rejection of the
      disgusting patriarchy of the "Republican" party.

      Warren stood up to Wall Street. The bankers wanted her, above others, gone.

      For all our problems (I lived for many years in Massachusetts and much of my
      family does still), the people of Massachusetts are not fools. Elizabeth
      Warren is the successor of Ted Kennedy.

      Warren (though not on foregin policy yet) is a voice for the future.


      Gay marriage was, for the first time, upheld in two elections. There isn't a
      single person in my class at Metro who has the slightest sympathy for
      bigotry. Obama is the first President to stand against homophobia and to
      include gay people in his victory speech.

      America is changing before our eyes.

      (Karl Rove's explosion on Fox News was a wonderful revelation of this - the
      moneyman of evil and epistemogical closure was unable to deal with the
      shattering of his demented universe, telling the peons who was boss.)


      Marijuana legalization won in Colorado. Three notes on this. First, tobacco,
      still pushed by the US government in Spain and China, inter alia, is lethal
      to people's lives in a way that grass is not.

      Alcoholism in America is also a far more startling danger than weed. We once
      had real prohibition - an abomination - for a reason. Drunkenness has always
      been a favorite drug for many people against a feeling of misery and
      oppression, generated by capitalism and by the amazing difficulties of
      family life.

      Second, Tom Tancredo, a leading racist and an odious human being, is
      completely right about this. It is a matter of individual liberty whether
      one smokes marijuana. The prohibition against it has resulted in a pseudo-
      and failed "war" on drugs (i.e. a lot of violence comes into our lives from
      this attempted prohibition).

      More importantly, as Michalle Alexander underlines in The New Jim Crow,
      America had 300,000 in jail in the 1970s. With the segregationists moving to
      the Republican party, the Congress passed mandatory sentencing. An 8 fold
      increase in prisoners to 2.3 million, 25% of the world's prisoners,

      Many people, particularly teenagers are in jail for possession of marijuana
      (80% of the increase is for victimless drug "crimes").

      The police permitted by the Supreme "Court" routinely violate the Fourth
      Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures by stopping cars in
      largely black or chicano neighborhoods, searching them, and doing drug busts
      on the 5% with some marijuana. If they did it in Boulder or Cherry Creek or
      Scarsdale, they would be halted by middle class outrage.

      It is despicable that Democrats like Michael Hancock blither about "gateway"
      drugs. It is now the time to push against the Obama administration's
      crackdown on marijuana, to cut down the jails, and to restore hope i.e.
      chances for education and jobs for people to whom what is basically an
      American police state (the prison-industrial complex, nurtured in racism and
      affecting many whites as well) has denied it.


      The choice in this election was between decency - this kind of democratic
      evolution, marked by protest movements from below - and an increasing police
      state of the .0001% (clinging to the older presudo-America by aggression,
      racism and repression). There is not much future, not just for the United
      States but for the existence of humans on this planet, in the second course.

      That was what was in the balance. It will be still for many years.

      Nonetheless, our reelection of Obama was a blow for decency.


      Peter Rugh, Nation of Change
      Published: Thursday 8 November 2012
      "As this storm has shown, those who will bear the brunt of extreme weather
      in the future will be those who are already struggling to survive. "

      Climate Change Lifts the Lid Off Inequality in New York City

      On Tuesday morning, as New Yorkers were beginning to vote, 60 polling
      stations had been either destroyed or turned into emergency shelters. Above
      the same waters that had flooded many of the city's coastal neighborhoods a
      week before, I and other Occupy movement activists hung a banner at the
      midpoint of the Manhattan Bridge. With the intention of drawing a line
      between the devastation caused by Hurricane Sandy and fossil fuels, it said,
      "Got climate change blues? Fuhgeddabout fossil fuels!"

      Six days earlier, on Halloween night, I pedaled past that same spot.
      Everything below 39th Street, with the exception of the Empire State
      Building, was dark. Locals took to referring to Lower Manhattan as the "dead
      zone." Areas of the city like Red Hook, Rockaway and Staten Island had been
      inundated with floodwaters and scarred by electrical fires. Public transit
      was completely shut down, and fuel scarce. People had taken to riding
      bicycles, for more reasons than one. In Brooklyn, for instance, the direct
      action bike troop Times Up! set up a bicycle generator - the same one used
      to power Zuccotti Park last fall - to help Manhattan refugees streaming over
      the Williamsburg Bridge power their cellphones and call their loved ones.

      This was just one tiny facet of a massive do-it-yourself relief effort that
      New Yorkers have mounted after the storm. It's also one of many attempts to
      show that this storm and the suffering it has caused are intimately related
      to the business that the dark towers of Lower Manhattan symbolize.

      The silence

      It wasn't until November 1 that the full scale of the disaster began to
      register. Mayor Michael Bloomberg told New Yorkers that the city was doing
      everything in its power to get back to business as usual again, but for
      people in areas most ravaged by Sandy, normalcy was a long way off. Power
      remained out for days, and across the city police guarded gas stations where
      long lines of parked cars sat idle waiting to creep up to barren tanks.

      In an unexpected turn, Bloomberg announced his endorsement for President
      Obama's reelection, citing the president's concern for climate change.
      Bloomberg thus recognized the connection between Sandy and global warming
      that even the president was unwilling to make. That same day, in fact, the
      Guardianreported that Obama and company had made a conscious decision in
      2009 not to talk about climate change directly. In a private meeting,
      administration officials told environmental activists that it was a losing
      talking point; instead, the administration said that it was going to be
      discussing "green jobs" and that environmental organizations should do the

      Accordingly, talk of climate change has been noticeably absent from Obama's
      2012 campaign, in sharp contrast to the soaring rhetoric of four years ago.
      When accepting his party's nomination for president in 2008, Obama promised
      that he would usher in the moment when the oceans would cease to rise. This
      time around he has been bragging that his administration has "built enough
      pipeline to encircle the Earth and then some."

      The lights

      Help us speak truth to power. Donate what you can afford to support

      The suction pumps dredging out water from homes in Red Hook were evidence
      that the oceans hadn't ceased to rise. Nikki Brierre was at home when Sandy
      came and she saw 10-foot waves from the Upper New York Bay crashing into her
      neighborhood. Brierre later evacuated to a friend's house but then went back
      to assess the damage. Her third-story apartment was untouched, but a greasy
      residue five feet tall clung to her neighbor's walls on the ground floor.

      Across the Gowanus Expressway and on higher ground, Carroll Gardens was
      virtually unaffected by the storm. Brierre went door to door there on
      Thursday, collecting blankets and nonperishable foods for those stranded on
      the other side of the highway, where volunteers with the non-profit Red Hook
      Initiative and Occupy Sandy Relief, an offshoot of Occupy Wall Street, were
      working to deliver basic supplies to the many in need.

      Brierre said the response to Sandy in Red Hook "makes me proud of where I
      live. It's a really strong community." She added though, that leaders needed
      to take climate change more seriously. "A hurricane at the end of October?
      It's pretty clear that our weather is not what it used to be."

      On Manhattan's Lower East Side on Friday, Shahana "Butterfly" Bryant and her
      friend Lourdes "Lou-Lou" Davila said they didn't know anything about climate
      change. I found them having a barbeque with some friends in front of the
      Barrier Free Living shelter on Avenue C and Houston, where they've been
      staying. Hot dogs sizzled on a grill while soul music pumped through an old
      boombox. Butterfly was grateful for all the help she'd received during the
      storm and in its aftermath, praising the dry packaged food that the National
      Guard had distributed as "delicious."

      After visiting Red Hook the day before and delivering food to apartments in
      Chinatown all day, this was the first I'd heard mention of the National
      Guard. As we spoke, though, several camouflaged Humvees coasted by.

      Lou-Lou, who uses a wheel chair, wasn't as content with the way things had
      been handled. She told me that before, during and after Sandy the Department
      of Homeless Services was nowhere to be found. There were no flashlights, so
      people were showering in the dark, which is especially difficult if you
      can't stand up. Barrier Free couldn't cook, so they'd been serving nothing
      but sandwiches and dry food since Monday night. These hot dogs were the
      first warm meal they'd had since the Lower East Side went dark. But the
      worst part for Lou-Lou was the cold. Hurricane Sandy, according to the Union
      of Concerned Scientists, coasted over waters that were nine degrees warmer
      than average on its way to New York, but on land the thermometer had been
      steadily dropping each night since the storm. There was a shortage of
      blankets, leaving those at the refuge to supply their own.

      People Lou-Lou knows were less fortunate than her. "I have friends that had
      to go out and panhandle," she said, "because their food went rotten and they
      had to feed their kids and families. They're still with no water at all.
      It's been horrible, really horrible."

      It was then that the lights above Barrier Free began to twinkle. The whole
      neighborhood began to shine as dusk set in. Lou-Lou and Butterfly's faces
      brightened. As I biked on through the Lower East Side, everyone I saw was
      wearing a big grin on their face. People lugging carts loaded with water
      were hooting and hollering. Though it was 5 o'clock in November it felt like
      New Year's. The return of power indicated to the neighborhood that, for them
      at least, the worst was over.

      The revolutionaries

      Elsewhere the disaster continued unabated. On Saturday in Sunset Park,
      Brooklyn, three National Guardsmen in camouflage fatigues sat through an
      orientation led by Occupy Wall Street activists from the altar of St. Jacobi
      Lutheran Church. Since Sandy, OWS has turned the expertise acquired in
      managing occupied Zuccotti Park last fall to hurricane relief. Occupy
      activists also teamed up with the environmental organization 350.org to help
      coordinate relief efforts online. In many cases, such as at St. Jacobi,
      government response teams are following the lead of the Occupiers.

      What started as a dozen Occupy Sandy volunteers collecting donations earlier
      in the week bloomed into a large and complex network of operations. Vans
      were being dispatched to more than a dozen stricken neighborhoods across the
      city, delivering food and supplies. Ten thousand meals had been prepared in
      the church's basement the night before. Orientations were being held around
      the clock as volunteers streamed in by the dozens.

      This orientation started like a typical Occupy meeting. Occupy is a
      leaderless, horizontal movement, volunteers were informed, so everyone has
      the opportunity to become a leader. What followed was a run-down of the
      basics of canvassing, of keeping safe, of the proper gear to bring and of
      ascertaining peoples' needs. At the end, volunteers were asked to sign up
      for shifts. The guardsmen got in line like everyone else to add their names
      to the list.

      In Red Hook on Sunday, a barker preaching revolution stood in front of a
      buffet, while those in line received spoonfuls of warm soul-food in
      styrofoam containers. Children and their parents positioned themselves on
      nearby corners distributing literature on the "People's Survival Program,"
      explaining that their relief efforts were only a temporary fix and that the
      real solution to the suffering of those in the housing projects is people

      That day, Occupy Sandy point-people in Red Hook sent the group I was with to
      an understaffed FEMA station in Coffey Park. I and 10 other volunteers
      wheeled a dolly through the projects making deliveries to elderly people
      cloistered inside.

      There was still no power in most of the buildings, and a thick stench of
      mold and garbage wafted up from the bottom floors. As each apartment door
      opened, a musty smell of hot, trapped humanity greeted us, accompanied by
      mole-eyed men and women patiently surviving on bottles of water and dry
      packaged food. They couldn't shower since they had no water, and they were
      keeping their windows shut to conserve heat. We noted what medication they
      needed and inquired about whether they had medical conditions that needed
      treatment. One woman in a wheelchair said she was developing bedsores and
      had an infection in her leg that needed draining. We jotted that down. On
      the way back to refill supplies, a woman stuck her head out her window and
      yelled, "I need money." We dutifully jotted that down too, along with her
      address, though probably the same could be said for everyone else in the
      neighborhood too.

      The marathon

      Politicians have seemed especially clumsy in the days since Sandy, as if to
      reveal the awkwardness of their role in both the causes of the hurricane and
      the inadequate response. Only after widespread pressure did Mayor Bloomberg
      finally cancel Sunday's New York City Marathon, which would have drawn city
      resources away from relief. Obama returned to the campaign trail last week,
      but there was still no mention of global warming from his lips. While giving
      a speech in Virginia, Mitt Romney was interrupted by a longtime
      environmental activist, Ted Glick, holding a sign that read "End Climate
      Silence" and demanding, during one of Romney's dramatic pauses, "What about
      climate change?" Cringing, Romney looked off into the distance while the
      crowd shouted the heckler down with chants of "U! S! A!"

      It was in this same spirit of denial that North Carolina's lawmakers decided
      over the summer to pass a bill mandating that scientists limit themselves to
      historical data when making sea-level projections; two weeks later a study
      revealed that the tides of North Carolina are encroaching on the shore
      faster than anywhere on earth. Overall, climate scientists who deny that
      global warming is real and human-induced are few and far between, totaling
      about 2 to 3 percent of their profession. In September, the Spanish
      non-profit DARA published a report that estimates 100 million people could
      perish as a result of climate change by 2030.

      As this storm has shown, those who will bear the brunt of extreme weather in
      the future will be those who are already struggling to survive. Those
      without power in society - the poor and working-class people of color
      inhabiting New York's outlying areas - have been stranded without electrical
      power. Sandy has lifted the lid off the inequality that already existed in
      New York City. What quiet failures of justice in our society will be
      revealed next by the effects of climate change remain to be seen.

      Posted by <http://www.blogger.com/profile/08980599518017458202> Alan

      No virus found in this message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2624/5882 - Release Date: 11/08/12

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.