## Re: [ksurfschool] ARC Weight, Self-Inflation

Expand Messages
• Weigh your old Naish. The RRD is a boat anchor. That s not really a fair test. I felt the same way after carrying the 18.9 RRD to the beach and then going back
Message 1 of 14 , Nov 5, 2001
Weigh your old Naish. The RRD is a boat anchor. That's not really a fair test. I felt the same way after carrying the 18.9 RRD to the beach and then going back to the car for my Wipika.

Dwight

A while ago when I posted my "ARC Advantages" text, somebody accused me of exaggerating when I claimed the ARC is lighter.  I finally got around to putting a couple of kites with nearly identical wind ranges on a scale*: an 840 ARC is TWENTY EIGHT percent lighter than an 8.9 RRD.  While discovering this, I recalled thinking that the light weight may be what helps it automatically go to zenith on its own (lift is greater than weight).

* I'd previously based my claim on how tired my arms were after carrying an inflatable a half mile to the water & back every day.  Now I know why!

I also still stand behind every other claim I make in that text.  I recently flew in wind WAY too light for even me (63kg) to ride (even on an 1120) & they both (630 & 1120) self inflated enough to launch solo.

Mel

• Mel, ... You may want to post the approx. weight of the kites you measured. The info could be useful to the others. Hung.
Message 2 of 14 , Nov 5, 2001
Mel,

> Mel wrote:
> A while ago when I posted my "ARC Advantages" text, somebody accused
> me of exaggerating when I claimed the ARC is lighter. I finally got
> around to putting a couple of kites with nearly identical wind ranges
> on a scale*: an 840 ARC is TWENTY EIGHT percent lighter than an 8.9
> RRD. While discovering this, I recalled thinking that the light
> weight may be what helps it automatically go to zenith on its own
> (lift is greater than weight).

You may want to post the approx. weight of the kites you measured. The
info could be useful to the others.

Hung.
• ... test. I already sold my old Naish or I would have weighed it. I would also have weighed an ARX (that would be a more fair test than an AR5), but I didn t
Message 3 of 14 , Nov 6, 2001
Dwight & Jacky wrote:

> Weigh your old Naish. The RRD is a boat anchor. That's not really a fair
test.

I already sold my old Naish or I would have weighed it. I would also have
weighed an ARX (that would be a more fair test than an AR5), but I didn't
have one of comparable size handy. In any case, even if an RRD is TWENTY
FIVE percent heavier than an ARX or AR5 (or other inflatables), an ARC would
still be lighter than all of them.

AND Hung Vu <hungvu@...> wrote:

> Mel,
>
> You may want to post the approx. weight of the kites you measured. The
> info could be useful to the others.

840 ARC: 5.25 pounds (2.39kg)
8.9 RRD: 7.25 pounds (3.30kg)

Both weighed in their bags, with pigtails, but no other parts (no lines, no
patch kit, no pump, no bar, no leaders, no harness lines). There are two
other things I feel need mentioning. Not only does the ARC not require a
lot of those parts at all (harness lines, pump, patch kit), but the others
it DOES require are lighter (lines, leaders & bar). ALSO: This comparison
is really only relevant just for carrying the kites around, since (as I
recently posted) while actually riding I feel there's little difference in
performance (it's the other characteristics that are different).

Mel
• are you kidding me? does the wieght of a kite really matter? ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your
Message 4 of 14 , Nov 7, 2001
are you kidding me? does the wieght of a kite really
matter?
--- Mel <kitebord@...> wrote:
> Dwight & Jacky wrote:
>
> > Weigh your old Naish. The RRD is a boat anchor.
> That's not really a fair
> test.
>
> I already sold my old Naish or I would have weighed
> it. I would also have
> weighed an ARX (that would be a more fair test than
> an AR5), but I didn't
> have one of comparable size handy. In any case,
> even if an RRD is TWENTY
> FIVE percent heavier than an ARX or AR5 (or other
> inflatables), an ARC would
> still be lighter than all of them.
>
> AND Hung Vu <hungvu@...> wrote:
>
> > Mel,
> >
> > You may want to post the approx. weight of the
> kites you measured. The
> > info could be useful to the others.
>
> 840 ARC: 5.25 pounds (2.39kg)
> 8.9 RRD: 7.25 pounds (3.30kg)
>
> Both weighed in their bags, with pigtails, but no
> other parts (no lines, no
> patch kit, no pump, no bar, no leaders, no harness
> lines). There are two
> other things I feel need mentioning. Not only does
> the ARC not require a
> lot of those parts at all (harness lines, pump,
> patch kit), but the others
> it DOES require are lighter (lines, leaders & bar).
> ALSO: This comparison
> is really only relevant just for carrying the kites
> around, since (as I
> recently posted) while actually riding I feel
> there's little difference in
> performance (it's the other characteristics that are
> different).
>
> Mel
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
• ... Matt, Kite weight makes a lot of differences in light wind or in kite skiing (high speed stuff...). In light wind or high speed you need to juice as much
Message 5 of 14 , Nov 7, 2001
matt nuzzo wrote:
>
> are you kidding me? does the wieght of a kite really
> matter?

Matt,

Kite weight makes a lot of differences in light wind or in kite skiing
(high speed stuff...).

In light wind or high speed you need to juice as much lift from the kite
as you can instead of wasting it to support the extra kite weight.

Hung.
• ... This subject was originated by my claim of ARCs being easier to carry around. I had the opportunity to weigh some kites as you d carry them from your car
Message 6 of 14 , Nov 7, 2001
Hung Vu <hungvu@...> wrote:

> In light wind or high speed you need to juice as much lift from the kite
> as you can instead of wasting it to support the extra kite weight.

This subject was originated by my claim of ARCs being easier to carry
around. I had the opportunity to weigh some kites as you'd carry them from
your car to the setup area (with bag, pump, bar, lines, leaders, harness
line, etc):
9.5ARX 8.5 pounds
1120ARC 7.88 pounds
17.5ARX 13.81 pounds
18.9RRD 15.88 pounds

Mel
• Hung is correct. Kite weight really makes a difference. Wait until you heft a 16.4. It is an enormous kite, nearly 50 feet in length, but it won t fly in
Message 7 of 14 , Nov 8, 2001
Hung is correct. Kite weight really makes a difference. Wait until
you heft a 16.4. It is an enormous kite, nearly 50 feet in length,
but it won't fly in less than 7 mph winds. It just weighs too much.
A big foil would make good sense in light winds. However, I haven't
yet found one that has as much power control as the 16.4. Maybe the
new Mastair 16 will do the trick.

Mel, do you know anything about the Mastair kites? How do you like
the 18.9 RRD? I have the 14.9 RRD, it is a well-built kite, but is
less responsive than my 11.8 AB. Mel, I am coming to S. CA after
Thanksgiving. How is the wind in late November? Hit or Miss or
blowing most days? I am wondering if I should bring my kite gear or
just go surfing.

Kenny

--- In ksurfschool@y..., Hung Vu <hungvu@n...> wrote:
> matt nuzzo wrote:
> >
> > are you kidding me? does the wieght of a kite really
> > matter?
>
> Matt,
>
> Kite weight makes a lot of differences in light wind or in kite
skiing
> (high speed stuff...).
>
> In light wind or high speed you need to juice as much lift from the
kite
> as you can instead of wasting it to support the extra kite weight.
>
> Hung.
• ... No. ... I haven t flown any RRDs except the 8.9 ... Neither. It s usually Miss or Miss (practically nothing, most of the time) ... The surfers say it s
Message 8 of 14 , Nov 9, 2001
<fernmanus@...> wrote:

> Mel, do you know anything about the Mastair kites?

No.

> How do you like
> the 18.9 RRD?

I haven't flown any RRDs except the 8.9

> Mel, I am coming to S. CA after
> Thanksgiving. How is the wind in late November? Hit or Miss or
> blowing most days?

Neither. It's usually Miss or Miss (practically nothing, most of the time)

> I am wondering if I should bring my kite gear or
> just go surfing.

The surfers say it's better in the winter.

Mel
• bigger is better. the monster kite get you lit no matter how much they wiegh. the naish 22.5 works. the wipika 16.4 works. the north 22 works. the
Message 9 of 14 , Nov 12, 2001
bigger is better. the monster kite get you lit no
matter how much they wiegh. the naish 22.5 works.
the wipika 16.4 works. the north 22 works. the
flysurfer.de 12 works. they all get you litt. that
is why you buy a mega kite.
--- fernmanus@... wrote:
> Hung is correct. Kite weight really makes a
> difference. Wait until
> you heft a 16.4. It is an enormous kite, nearly 50
> feet in length,
> but it won't fly in less than 7 mph winds. It just
> weighs too much.
> A big foil would make good sense in light winds.
> However, I haven't
> yet found one that has as much power control as the
> 16.4. Maybe the
> new Mastair 16 will do the trick.
>
> Mel, do you know anything about the Mastair kites?
> How do you like
> the 18.9 RRD? I have the 14.9 RRD, it is a
> well-built kite, but is
> less responsive than my 11.8 AB. Mel, I am coming
> to S. CA after
> Thanksgiving. How is the wind in late November?
> Hit or Miss or
> blowing most days? I am wondering if I should bring
> my kite gear or
> just go surfing.
>
> Kenny
>
> --- In ksurfschool@y..., Hung Vu <hungvu@n...>
> wrote:
> > matt nuzzo wrote:
> > >
> > > are you kidding me? does the wieght of a kite
> really
> > > matter?
> >
> > Matt,
> >
> > Kite weight makes a lot of differences in light
> wind or in kite
> skiing
> > (high speed stuff...).
> >
> > In light wind or high speed you need to juice as
> much lift from the
> kite
> > as you can instead of wasting it to support the
> extra kite weight.
> >
> > Hung.
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
• Mel -- Take a shot. you got technical. ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
Message 10 of 14 , Nov 12, 2001
Mel -- Take a shot. you got technical.
--- Mel <kitebord@...> wrote:
> Hung Vu <hungvu@...> wrote:
>
> > In light wind or high speed you need to juice as
> much lift from the kite
> > as you can instead of wasting it to support the
> extra kite weight.
>
> This subject was originated by my claim of ARCs
> being easier to carry
> around. I had the opportunity to weigh some kites
> as you'd carry them from
> your car to the setup area (with bag, pump, bar,
> line, etc):
> 9.5ARX 8.5 pounds
> 1120ARC 7.88 pounds
> 17.5ARX 13.81 pounds
> 18.9RRD 15.88 pounds
>
> Mel
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
• I am going to put the bigger is better theory to the test. I just purchased a Flysurfer Mast 16 to compare with my Wipika 16.4 AB. You need more than the
Message 11 of 14 , Nov 13, 2001
I am going to put the bigger is better theory to the test. I just
purchased a Flysurfer Mast 16 to compare with my Wipika 16.4 AB.

You need more than the ability to be "lit" from a large kite. You
also need a kite that turns relatively quickly, the 16.4 AB is the
only big kite that I have found that is any good for jumping. This
years Naish 21.5 and 23.5 are lousy kites. They suck for jumping
because they are so slow and nearly impossible to relaunch. I
haven't tried the North 22 yet.

Kenny
--- In ksurfschool@y..., matt nuzzo <realkiteobx@y...> wrote:
> bigger is better. the monster kite get you lit no
> matter how much they wiegh. the naish 22.5 works.
> the wipika 16.4 works. the north 22 works. the
> flysurfer.de 12 works. they all get you litt. that
> is why you buy a mega kite.
> --- fernmanus@y... wrote:
> > Hung is correct. Kite weight really makes a
> > difference. Wait until
> > you heft a 16.4. It is an enormous kite, nearly 50
> > feet in length,
> > but it won't fly in less than 7 mph winds. It just
> > weighs too much.
> > A big foil would make good sense in light winds.
> > However, I haven't
> > yet found one that has as much power control as the
> > 16.4. Maybe the
> > new Mastair 16 will do the trick.
> >
> > Mel, do you know anything about the Mastair kites?
> > How do you like
> > the 18.9 RRD? I have the 14.9 RRD, it is a
> > well-built kite, but is
> > less responsive than my 11.8 AB. Mel, I am coming
> > to S. CA after
> > Thanksgiving. How is the wind in late November?
> > Hit or Miss or
> > blowing most days? I am wondering if I should bring
> > my kite gear or
> > just go surfing.
> >
> > Kenny
> >
> > --- In ksurfschool@y..., Hung Vu <hungvu@n...>
> > wrote:
> > > matt nuzzo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > are you kidding me? does the wieght of a kite
> > really
> > > > matter?
> > >
> > > Matt,
> > >
> > > Kite weight makes a lot of differences in light
> > wind or in kite
> > skiing
> > > (high speed stuff...).
> > >
> > > In light wind or high speed you need to juice as
> > much lift from the
> > kite
> > > as you can instead of wasting it to support the
> > extra kite weight.
> > >
> > > Hung.
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
> http://personals.yahoo.com
• ... Geez! I just wrote that ARCs are lighter to carry, & somebody disagreed, so I published the weights (since Hung asked for them). You don t have to read it
Message 12 of 14 , Nov 13, 2001
matt nuzzo <realkiteobx@...> wrote:

> Mel -- Take a shot. you got technical.

Geez! I just wrote that ARCs are lighter to carry, & somebody disagreed, so
I published the weights (since Hung asked for them).

You don't have to read it ;)

Mel
P.S. Can I still take that shot?
• Mel go for the handle bottle. It sounds like it might help your kiting. -- Matt ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find
Message 13 of 14 , Nov 14, 2001
Mel go for the handle bottle. It sounds like it might
--- Mel <kitebord@...> wrote:
> matt nuzzo <realkiteobx@...> wrote:
>
> > Mel -- Take a shot. you got technical.
>
> Geez! I just wrote that ARCs are lighter to carry,
> & somebody disagreed, so
> I published the weights (since Hung asked for them).
>
> You don't have to read it ;)
>
> Mel
> P.S. Can I still take that shot?
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.