Re: [ksurfschool] Help - I'm confused !!!...
- Mark Frasier wrote:
> on 2/1/01 1:53 PM, Hung Vu at hungvu@... wrote:So what "stop" Peter and the foil vendors from mass producing them
> > P.P.S. Even the largest Arc is only 8.4 m2 projected surface... Peter
> > Lynn might have forgotten how to make bigger kites...
> > Hung.
> I think he just forgot to mass produce them! He knows how to make them - the
> Arc can be special ordered up to 30 sq m!!! for use in sailing boats.
> Apparently the fabric they're made of can't hold together on a bigger kite
> than 30m.
(kites larger than 10m2 and smaller than 30 m2)?
It's definitely not market demand as I and a number of people I have
exchanged emails with (Stefano for example) have been looking in the
last 2 years for 12+ m2 kites..... The only non-custom kite that
currently may fit that description is the Wipika AirBlast 16.4 (the
other big inflatables are OK too but they may not have high AR and the
reverse relaunch capability - which are somewhat important in light
Ironically, in light wind, the inflatables are not as good as the foils
but the foil vendors somewhat "reluctant" to claim that market and the
inflatable vendors seem to be better marketeers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hung Vu" <hungvu@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ksurfschool] Help - I'm confused !!!...
> So what "stop" Peter and the foil vendors from mass producing them
> (kites larger than 10m2 and smaller than 30 m2)?
You know, I just realized something - when the C Quads first came out the
biggest size planned was a 6.3. Now 8.5s are common and they also make 10.5s
and 12.5s. Same story with Peels. Other companies do the same thing, too
(Quadrifoil springs to mind).
Maybe we will see bigger Arcs (et. al.) in the next batch, especially if
people make the demand known to the manufacturers. 10 people bobbing in the
water wishing for a bigger kite are not worth one who writes to the people
who need to hear it - especially if the manufacturers are in windy Maui or
- In a message dated 2/1/01 9:16:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, hungvu@...
<< Even the largest Arc is only 8.4 m2 projected surface. >>
My chart shows it's not even that big, (only 8.0). I think they revised the
sizes recently to more accurately reflect the correct projected areas.