The polio vaccine, AIDS, and their US-made viruses
- Please send as far and wide as possible.
Editor, The Konformist
The polio vaccine, AIDS, and their US-made viruses
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor
Jan 11, 2008
When I was a teenager growing up in Brooklyn, my parents warned me
every summer to stay away from public pools or taking any chances
running under opened fire hydrants to cools us from the brick-and-
tar baking heat. Their fear was the epidemic of polio that haunted
the US -- 52,000 cases in 1952 alone. My parents worried that
polio "germs" could be carried in the highly used and abused public
Yet in April 1955, in my 17th year, lo and behold Dr. Jonas Salk, a
funny looking guy from Pittsburgh, announced from the University of
Michigan that he had developed a polio vaccine for distribution.
Eureka. Thousands of families like mine flooded to the local
doctors, clinics, and hospitals. It seemed all those rosaries my
friends' mothers and mine gave up to the Holy Mother paid off. But
As William Carlsen reports in his SFGATE article "Rogue virus in the
vaccine:" Salk's vaccine was produced by actually growing live polio
virus on kidney tissue from the Asian rhesus monkey. The virus was
then killed with formaldehyde. Thus, when the vaccine was injected
in humans, the dead virus generated antibodies that could fend off
live polio. What a simple, beautiful idea. Or so it seemed.
What the millions of people who were injected didn't know, nor would
they until 1959, when Bernice Eddy, looking in her microscope at the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), found that monkey kidney cells,
the very same kind used to make the vaccine, were dying with no
known cause. So she experimented.
She prepared extracts from kidneys from eight to 10 rhesus monkeys.
She then injected tiny amounts beneath the skin of 23 newborn
hamsters. In nine months, "large, malignant, subcutaneous tumors"
showed up on 20 of the animals -- and the world shook. Or did it?
Eddy tried to spread the word
Horrified that a monkey virus could be contaminating the famous
polio vaccine, on July 6, 1960, Eddy shared her findings with Dr.
Joseph Smadel, chief of NIH's biologics division, who summarily
dismissed the tumors as harmless "lumps." Meanwhile at a
Pennsylvania Merck lab, Dr. Maurice Hilleman and Dr. Ben Sweet
isolated the virus. They named it Simian Virus 40 or SV40 for being
the 40th virus found in rhesus kidney tissue. So much for miracle
Nevertheless, by then we seemed to be winning the polio war. Sixty
percent of the population, some 98 million Americans, had gotten at
least one shot of the Salk vaccine and the number of cases was
Concurrently, an oral polio vaccine developed by virologist Albert
Sabin was in its final trials in Russia and Eastern Europe. Tens of
millions of people had been given it, and it was ready to be
licensed in the US. Its big difference was that unlike the Salk
vaccine, Sabin's version contained a live but weakened form of polio
virus that "promised" lifelong immunity.
Fortunately, US Public Health Service (PHS) officials had conducted
tests and found SV40 in both the Sabin and Salk vaccines. The US PHS
estimated that a third of the Salk vaccine was tainted, and that
SV40 was causing cancer in lab animals. Picture the corporate and
government panic at this news, which was less than mildly shared
with the public.
Early in 1961, PHS officials met quietly with the agency's top
vaccine advisers. Strangely, the agency found no evidence the virus
had been harmful to humans. Yet in March, officials ordered
manufacturers to eliminate SV40 from all future vaccine. New plans
to neutralize the tainted polio virus seed stock were adopted and
SV40-free African green monkeys were used to make the bulk vaccine
instead of rhesus monkeys. More monkey business.
Amazingly, officials didn't recall the contaminated Salk vaccine,
that is, more than a year's supply. It stayed in the hands of the
country's doctors. And they didn't notify the public of the
contamination and SV40's effect on new born hamsters. Their strange
reasoning was that any negative information could start a panic and
put the vaccination campaign in danger. What about the millions of
people who took the vaccines? Weren't they being put in danger?
The first disclosure
The Salk vaccine contamination story crept on cat's feet on July 26,
1961, onto page 33 of the New York Times. It reported Merck and
other manufacturers had halted production until they could
get "monkey virus" out of the vaccine. Asked for comments, the US
PHS said there was no evidence the virus was dangerous. Except, of
course, to the 20 baby hamsters it blew away.
In 1962, a Harvard epidemiologist, Dr. Joseph Fraumeni, joined the
National Cancer Institute and was assigned to find out if there was
any cancer increase among those injected with the Salk vaccine. With
two Colleagues, Fraumeni tested vaccine samples from May and June of
1955, the first months of the national immunization campaign. Then
they ranked the samples according to "no," "low" or "high" amounts
of SV40 they contained.
It was the only time US health officials would measure such level in
the 55-62 vaccine. Stored samples were later dumped. Fraumeni
pinpointed states where contaminated vaccines were distributed
during the key months. California received a vaccine with a low
level of the virus. The study also looked at cancer death rates for
6-to-8-year olds vaccinated during that narrow time frame and
tracked the group for four years.
Findings, published in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, showed no significant difference in cancer deaths in
states with high or low levels of SV40 in the vaccine when compared
with cancer deaths in states with no SV40 in the vaccine.
Yet some 14 years later, after "isolated reports" linking the virus
to human cancers, Fraumeni deemed another group should be looked at
that had received contaminated vaccine. This group was the subject
of trials conducted in the early '60s at Cleveland Metropolitan
general Hospital. To see the effect of different amounts of SV40 in
vaccines, hospital researchers inoculated newborns from mostly lower-
income black families. Noticeably, doses ranged up to more than 100
times the dose recommended for adults, not a nice thing to do to
those black kids.
The experiments spanned three years, involving 1,073 infants. The
majority were given Sabin oral, which later was shown to contain
SV40. A 1982 report in the New England Journal of Medicine hedged
the study's limitations: that a majority of the kids had not
responded; but SV40-realted cancers could take longer than 17 to 19
years to appear; and SV40 appeared less likely to infect humans
through the oral vaccine.
Despite these critical caveats, the whitewash called the
findings "reassuring and consistent with the prevailing view that
SV40 is not carcinogenic in human beings." Then they called a halt
to the studies, claiming "mountains of complexities and obstacles in
tracing this particular group and the negative results to date."
This is not to mention their destructive racism, which would remain
part of the government's position for years.
In Boston, Dr. Robert Garcea and assistant, Dr. John Bergsagel, used
a new tool, a polymerase chain reaction, PCR, to look for a pair of
common human viruses in kids' brain tumors. A different DNA
footprint popped up in more than half the tumors. It finally hit
them that they were seeing SV40.
The PCR was capable of amplifying the smallest fragments of DNA,
making detections far more credible than earlier more primitive
tests for SV40-like proteins in human tumors. The findings were
disturbing, indicating that the children were too young to have
received the contaminated vaccine, yet somehow the virus infected
them and embedded itself in their tumors.
In that same year, Dr. Michele Carbone found a milky, rind-like
tumor in a laboratory at the National Insitutes of Health in
Bethesda, Md. Carbone performed a variety of experiments showing
that sixty percent of hamsters, after having SV40 injected into
their hearts, contracted the fatal cancer, mesothelioma. Something
awful was happening.
Carbone finally used PCR to test 48 human mesotheliomas stored at
the NIH. He was stunned when 28 of them contained SV40. PCR went on
to unleash a wave of SV40 discoveries. By the end of 1996, dozens of
scientists reported SV40 in a variety of bone cancers and a wide
range of brain cancers, a rise of 30 percent over the previous 20
At the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, officials were growing
increasingly concerned about the SV40 discoveries. And these
findings were of particular interest to Fraumeni, who had been
promoted to director of the NCI (National Cancer Institute)'s
Division on Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. His early studies
concluding that SV40 posed little or no health risk were now under
challenge . . .
More about the NCI, National Cancer Institute
The deadly truth is that the National Cancer Institute (NCI-
Frederick) and 37 mission partners are located at Fort Detrick,
about 20 minutes from Bethesda, Maryland. The Fort is home to the
United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (ISAMRMC).
The primary missions include biomedical research and development.
This is where the AIDS virus was developed, but not from monkeys.
In my 2005 Online Journal article, The AIDS virus: Made in the USA?,
I reported that "Dr. Robert Strecker indicated that the AIDS virus
was in fact developed by the National Cancer Institute, in
cooperation with the World Health Organization (WHO), in a
laboratory at Ft. Detrick in Maryland. From 197074, this laboratory
facility was part of the U.S. Army's germ warfare unit, known as the
Army Infectious Disease Unit, or Special Operations Division, also
referred to as the Army's Chemical and Biological Warfare
Laboratory. Post 1974, the facility was renamed the National Cancer
Institute (NCI). According to researcher William Cooper (former Navy
Intelligence officer), noted in Larry Jamison's article Is The AIDS
Virus Man Made?, this work was supervised by the CIA under a project
called MK-NAOMI. [To get to this site click link, then "All News,"
then "Next page"].
"Dr. Strecker has also traced some of the research and researchers
at Ft. Detrick/NCI to a group of Japanese scientists captured at WW
II's end and given amnesty in exchange for information on racial and
ethnic bio-weaponry, their research dating back to 1930. What's
more, expatriated Russian scientists were brought in to help as well.
"Dr. Strecker, one of the original and foremost authorities on the
AIDS virus, found that the virus creation was conducted under the
leadership of Dr. Robert Gallo, who later claimed to discover the
virus. Dr. Gallo and his team created the AIDS virus by combining
the bovine (cattle) leukemia virus and visna (sheep) virus, and
injecting them into human tissue cultures.
"They discovered, as Strecker did, that bovine leukemia virus is
lethal to cattle, but not to humans. And the visna virus is deadly
to sheep, but not to man. However, when combined, they produce a
retro-virus that can change the genetic composition of the cells
they enter. In fact, as Larry Jamison points out, early field tests
on prison convicts led to sickness then death, which inspired Gallo
and friends to bigger and more terrible things, including injecting
brothers and sisters with the tainted vaccine to see who died first.
This was done to study HLA (human leukocyte antigen processing), to
see how related people reacted. Frighteningly, whole families got
sick at once! And there was worse to come.
"The AIDS retro-virus works, as Dr. Strecker states, by causing the
destruction of the immune system, fundamentally the body's white
blood or T-cells essential to the effectiveness of the immune system
particularly against opportunistic infections diseases. The B-cells
deal with more benign, bacterial infections. AZT, the drug which is
a kind of junk food that starves the AIDS virus, often kills the
patient as well. It provides dubious consolation. . . ."
As an updating underscore, I quote from Dr. Alan Cantwell's 11/4/04
article at Rense.com, The Man-Made Origin Of AIDS -- Important
Notes . . . in which he unqualifiedly states: "VISNA VIRUS WAS
MOVED INTO PORCINE, BOVINE, AND HUMAN CELLS CAUSING PRODUCTIVE
INFECTION PRIOR TO ANY ADVENT OF HIV ANYWHERE.
" . . . The capital-lettered statement above is uncontestable. It is
The polio virus was monkey-derived, but AIDS was not . . .
I repeat the above so that the idea of a monkey biting an African's
butt or of Simian Virus 40 being the culprit for HIV-AIDS is not the
case. There is a desire to surrender to this idea because it seems
convenient. African populations live in jungle areas and are largely
black and may be in contact with monkeys. Unfortunately, to a lesser
degree AIDS has struck white communities in America as well, either
white and/or gay in addition to black and/or Latino, i.e.
minorities, ergo expendable to the elites. The question is, was the
CIA/NCI behind the polio virus as well? It's timeline flows into and
parallels the AIDS virus.
Again, the AIDS virus was weaponized at Fort Detrick. As Cantwell
reports, "I believe, based on now some 16 years of investigation of
this whole thing that HIV is a strategic biological weapon designed
to kill billions of people in a slow-unfolding relentless holocaust
which was released in two different vaccination programs: a) the
smallpox vaccination program in Africa commencing in the late 1960s,
b) the hepatitis-B vaccination program in the United States in the
"Moreover, so it is perfectly clear, this contamination was no
accident. It was done on purpose with the goal of `thinning the
herd' in a Nazi-like mindset that has covertly governed population
control politics since the 1870s. These same politics had pervaded
the WHO [World Health Organization] and most of western medical
experimental science throughout the 20th century. And, to be very
pointed: the same political ideology is still there. Non-whites [and
gay whites] are detrimental to the gene pool's evolution so says the
political philosophy. To see a bit of this in history, go here:
"This belief system is pervasive in the molecular sciences as it is
at the heart of eugenics, cloning, evolution, and heritability."
Yet, little did my Brooklyn family, friends, myself and America know
what darker forces were lurking about us in the 50s and 60s,
especially in the post WW-ll surge in our economy, military
strength, intelligence community and the confidence that America was
the best, safest, the most noble place to grow up in and ultimately
In fact, was the polio vaccine weaponized from the get-go with SV40
the way the World Health Organization laced a smallpox vaccine for
millions of Africans with the AIDS virus? Or was the polio virus a
Pandora's box opened by a well-meaning Salk? If so, why did it take
so long to unearth and never really correct it? And how many
millions of Americans have paid with their lives via the SV40 cancer-
link? Here is one doctor's answer, again from my article . . .
"Also, concerning green monkeys, Dr. William Campbell Douglass, MD,
writes in 1987 in W.H.O. Murdered Africa: "This is the origin of the
green monkey theory. The polio vaccine was grown on green monkey
kidney cells and the geniuses who brought us polio vaccine said: `We
got away with it once so let's use it again.' But they didn't get
away with it and in spite of the fact that polio was rapidly
disappearing without any medical intervention, 64 million Americans
were vaccinated with SV-40 contaminated vaccine in the 60s. An
increase in cancer of the brain, possibly multiple sclerosis and God
only knows what else is the tragic result. The delay between
vaccination and the onset of cancer with this virus is as long as 20
30 years. Nineteen sixty-five plus 20 equals 1985. Get the picture?"
Unfortunately, it's a rather grim picture, but as close as the truth
as I can get on this awful subject. I suggest you read the entirety
of my first AIDS article, including all links. Knowledge is power as
they say. And even back in 2005, I reported Bilderberger involvement
in all this, the power beyond the powers that rule, going about its
Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York. Reach him at