Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Former Justice Department official describes illegal actions by Bush

Expand Messages
  • Robert Sterling
    Please send as far and wide as possible. Thanks, Robert Sterling Editor, The Konformist http://www.konformist.com
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 2, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Please send as far and wide as possible.

      Thanks,
      Robert Sterling
      Editor, The Konformist
      http://www.konformist.com

      http://wsws.org/articles/2007/may2007/come-m17.shtml

      World Socialist Web Site

      Former Justice Department official describes illegal actions by Bush
      administration in defense of domestic spying
      By Joe Kay
      17 May 2007

      In congressional testimony on Tuesday, a former top Justice
      Department official described how White House officials resorted to
      extraordinary actions to defend the administration's illegal
      warrantless domestic wiretapping program. The testimony provides a
      portrait of an administration that operates outside of the law in
      the prosecution of a historically unprecedented attack on democratic
      rights.

      Former Deputy Attorney General James Comey spoke before the Senate
      Judiciary Committee, answering questions from New York Democrat
      Charles Schumer. Comey gave details of a dispute between the White
      House and high-ranking officials in the Justice Department,
      including then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, over the National
      Security Agency (NSA) warrentless electronic surveillance operation
      initiated by executive order shortly after the September 11, 2001
      attacks. The dispute was first reported in the press in early 2006,
      but only in its broad outlines.

      The wiretapping program involves spying on international phone calls
      and emails by people in the United States without the benefit of a
      court-issued warrant, in violation of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence
      Surveillance Act (FISA). It was so blatantly illegal that it
      provoked sharp opposition within the Justice Department, with Bush-
      appointee Ashcroft and Comey refusing to certify the program's
      legality when it was up for reauthorization in 2004.

      Comey was at the time (early March 2004) the acting attorney
      general, because Ashcroft was incapacitated following surgery for
      pancreatitis. Comey described how White House officials, angered by
      his refusal to certify the program's legality, sought to pressure
      Ashcroft behind Comey's back to give his approval. Those most
      directly involved were then-White House Counsel and current Attorney
      General Alberto Gonzales and then-White House Chief of Staff Andrew
      Card, backed by Vice President Dick Cheney.

      "I was concerned that this was an effort to do an end-run around the
      acting attorney general and to get a very sick man to approve
      something that the Department of Justice had already concluded—the
      department as a whole—it was unable to certify as to its legality,"
      Comey testified.

      Comey did not give details on the nature of the Justice Department's
      objections, nor what was eventually done to mollify its concerns. He
      refused even to explicitly confirm that he was speaking about the
      NSA program, citing its classified nature.

      The dispute between the Justice Department and the White House
      emerged after a review by the Justice Department's Office of Legal
      Counsel found that there was no legal foundation for the spying
      program.

      In line with previous discussions with Ashcroft and the
      recommendations of the department, Comey refused to give his
      approval. The details of what happened next provide a picture of the
      type of methods employed by the White House, even against opponents
      within the administration itself.

      Ashcroft's wife, who had banned visitors to Ashcroft while he was
      recovering from surgery, called Ashcroft's assistant on March 10,
      2004 to inform him that she had received a call, and that Card and
      Gonzales would be visiting the disabled attorney general. Asked who
      made this call to Ashcroft's wife, Comey testified, "I have some
      recollection that the call was from the president himself, but I
      don't know that for sure. It came from the White House."

      Comey, informed by Ashcroft's assistant of the pending visit, moved
      quickly to intervene. Jumping into his car, he "told my security
      detail that I needed to get to George Washington Hospital
      immediately. They turned on the emergency equipment and drove [with
      emergency lights flashing and siren blaring] very quickly to the
      hospital." Arriving at the hospital he "literally ran up the stairs
      with my security detail."

      Comey was clearly concerned that Card and Gonzales would pressure a
      half-conscious Ashcroft to sign onto the spying program without
      fully realizing what he was doing. Comey, however, arrived at
      Ashcroft's hospital bed first. "I immediately began speaking to
      him," Comey testified, "trying to orient him as to time and place,
      and trying to see if he could focus on what was happening, and it
      wasn't clear to me that he could. He seemed pretty bad off."

      Comey was so concerned that the White House officials would resort
      to thuggish behavior he called then-FBI Director Robert Mueller and
      had Mueller instruct the FBI agents present in Ashcroft's room "not
      to allow me to be removed from the room under any circumstances."

      After a few minutes, Gonzales and Card arrived, and Gonzales began
      speaking with Ashcroft, asking him to reauthorize the program.
      Ashcroft refused, on the basis of the discussion with Comey and
      previous discussions in the Justice Department. According to
      Comey, "As he laid back down, he said, `But that doesn't matter,
      because I'm not the attorney general. There is the attorney
      general,' and he pointed to me ... The two men did not acknowledge
      me. They turned and walked from the room."

      Shortly after this interview, Card called Comey and demanded that he
      attend a meeting in the White House that evening. Again evidently
      convinced that the White House would resort to thuggish or
      underhanded methods, he insisted that he would not meet at the White
      House without a witness, choosing Theodore Olson, the solicitor
      general.

      Unable to secure Comey's support, the White House decided to go
      ahead with the program anyway. "The program was reauthorized without
      us and without a signature from the Department of Justice attesting
      as to its legality," Comey said.

      This is an extraordinary revelation. The Bush administration, in
      violation of the legal opinion of its own Justice Department—
      presumably responsible for upholding the law—went ahead with a
      program that involves unprecedented attacks on the democratic rights
      of the American people.

      In response to this move, Comey says that he, Ashcroft and Mueller
      prepared to resign from the administration. This evidently prompted
      the White House to engage in some damage control to prevent an open
      rupture. Bush held a personal meeting with both Comey and Mueller,
      and some sort of arrangement was worked out to allow the spying
      program to continue, with the Justice Department officials giving
      their formal approval a few weeks later.

      Comey would not give any details about what the nature of this
      agreement was, but it did not involve any fundamental changes to the
      program, which has continued to be used to spy on Americans without
      warrants. Indeed, the very existence of the program was not revealed
      until December of 2005.

      This testimony speaks volumes about the modus operandi of the Bush
      administration. Comey was a top official in the administration. He
      was intimately familiar with the types of methods used by the White
      House, and his response in the dispute with Gonzales and Card was no
      doubt based on his prior experiences.

      The Washington Post, in an editorial on Wednesday, spoke of
      a "lawlessness so shocking that it would have been unbelievable
      coming from a less reputable source." This is indeed the basic
      character of the Bush administration—in its handling of domestic
      spying, the war in Iraq, and every other aspect of its policy.

      The incident also underscores the illegality of the program itself.
      Ashcroft, one of the principal architects of the Patriot Act and
      similar legislation, is not known for his defense of democratic
      rights. That he, Mueller and Comey felt they had to oppose the White
      House is an indication of how unprecedented the new spying measures
      of the Bush administration were.

      A year-and-a-half after the NSA spying program was first revealed to
      the public, its breadth and depth still remain unknown. What is
      clear, however, is that the Bush administration has begun compiling
      vast databases of phone calls, phone records, emails and other
      communications in violation of the FISA Act.

      In 2006, a US Federal court ruled the NSA program unconstitutional
      and illegal, a decision that is currently under appeal. Meanwhile,
      the Bush administration is seeking Congressional approval for
      changes in the FISA Act that would expand government powers. The
      White House continues to insist, however, that whatever the law, the
      president has the constitutional authority as commander-in-chief to
      spy on the American people.

      There are ample grounds for impeaching everyone involved in
      implementing these policies, including the president and vice
      president. Arlen Specter, the lone Republican senator to attend the
      hearing on Tuesday, noted that the story "has some characteristics
      of the Saturday Night Massacre." He was referring to Nixon's
      dismissal of the special prosecutor into the Watergate scandal
      Archibald Cox, and the subsequent resignations of the attorney
      general and the deputy attorney general.

      The Saturday Night Massacre led eventually to the initiation of
      impeachment proceedings and the subsequent resignation of Nixon. In
      fact, the lawlessness of the Bush administration makes the actions
      of Nixon in Watergate look like petty theft.

      In spite of this, very little has been made by the Democratic Party
      of the illegal spying program and the broader attacks on democratic
      rights, and there have been no serious calls for impeachment. On the
      contrary, Democratic congressional leaders such as House Speaker
      Nancy Pelosi have insisted repeatedly that there will be no move to
      impeach Bush, and this stance has been publicly defended by a number
      of so-called "anti-war" Democrats in Congress.

      In fact, the Democrats do not have any principled disagreements with
      the Bush administration's attack on the democratic rights of the
      American people.

      It should be recalled that Senate Democrats helped give NSA chief
      Michael Hayden, who oversaw the illegal domestic spying program, a
      78-15 confirmation vote to head the Central Intelligence Agency in
      May 2006, and they refused to filibuster Gonzales' nomination to
      head the Justice Department in February 2005. Among those voting for
      Hayden was Charles Schumer.

      Since they took control of Congress in January, the Democrats have
      said next to nothing about the NSA spying program and other
      unconstitutional domestic surveillance operations. Comey himself was
      called to testify in connection with the scandal surrounding the
      firing of US attorneys, not NSA warrantless wiretapping.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.