Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

NY Police Report Bomb to Frame Truth Activist as Terrorist

Expand Messages
  • Leticia Martinez
    Leticia Martinez NY Police Report Bomb to Frame Truth Activist as Terrorist By the time the government finds out, you ll be in the hole
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 28, 2007
      Leticia Martinez <leticia64@...>

      NY Police Report Bomb to Frame Truth Activist as
      Terrorist

      "By the time the government finds out, you'll be in
      the hole thirty days" 9/11 Truther is Told By Officer
      Who Admits to False Accusation of Having a Bomb
      Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | April 27, 2007

      Two persons identifying themselves as New York police
      officers interrupted a 9/11 Truth demonstration-- on a
      public sidewalk in front of the new WTC 7 Building--
      to intimidate free speech, stating "Larry
      [Silverstein] doesn't want to hear it," before
      accusing We Are Change founder Luke Rudkowski of
      having a bomb and that his cell phone was "a gun."

      The officer was apparently responding to refusals to
      stop filming their faces as police attempted to impede
      free speech on behalf of Larry Silverstein-- making
      slanderous and knowingly false accusations:

      "I think he's got a bomb in his bag. Saw wires coming
      out. Think he's got a bomb in there."

      The police officer carried on during the encounter,
      saying "A terrorist act-- I guess they go away for
      about 30 days."

      http://www.youtube.com/v/nYc2qQQfOXs

      Rudkowski tell him he is not a terrorist and that he
      is an American citizen. The officer responds, "You're
      right. But by the time the government figures it out,
      you'll be in the hole for 30 days."

      The officer made the statements on camera with a
      notable smirk, and made no attempt to distance himself
      or other witnesses from any physical danger (as he
      would have done he actually believed the activist had
      a bomb). The officer went on to give away his criminal
      behavior-- still on tape, despite ongoing demands he
      and the other officer made that the cameras be shut
      off.

      Alex Jones commented, "We have New York police ON TAPE
      threatening to frame someone for terrorism in a
      nonchalant fashion. How bad would it have gotten if
      there were no cameras around? If they'll talk like
      this ON CAMERA, heaven help us."

      http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-112361515.html

      People are arrested every day for joking about bombs
      or making other bomb references, even if it is clearly
      not meant to be serious.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolpda/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_4281000/4281814.stm?%28none%29


      This man identified himself as a police officer and
      accused Rudkowski of 'having a bomb' and 'being a
      terrorist' to silence his free speech for Larry
      Silverstein. It is a serious federal and state crime
      to publicly state that someone has a bomb and is a
      terrorist when not true-- like extreme example of
      yelling fire in a theatre-- and needs to be
      prosecuted.

      Such knowingly misleading and false information is not
      only malicious and immoral, but has been made
      specifically illegal under the Anti-Hoax Terrorism Act
      of 2003-- and expanded for more stringency in 2004 and
      the Terrorism Prevention Act of 2006, not to mention
      long-standing protections against defamation and
      public endangerment. There are also many state and
      local laws prohibiting such activity.

      http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.01441:

      http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2204:

      http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_cr/s3848.html

      http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/sept_11/ny_001.htm


      This man who identified himself as a police officer
      insisted that Rudkowski and other members of
      WeAreChange.org must cease videotaping him.

      Based on this video evidence alone, this officer
      should receive a prison sentence and would be liable
      for civil damages as well-- not only to the wronged
      demonstrator, but by law enforcement for a dangerous
      waste of resources, as cited by Ted Kennedy's
      commentary regarding expansion:

      http://kennedy.senate.gov/newsroom/press_release.cfm?id=F0B71889-81FC-4A5F-97F9-FB5A2ABD654B

      "In addition, this measure expands civil liability
      to allow federal and state governments to seek
      reimbursement from someone who knows that emergency
      personnel are responding to a hoax and fails to inform
      authorities that no such event has occurred."

      Rudkowski was not only intimidated by the corrupt and
      criminal officer, but his camera was confiscated.
      Shortly afterwards, police also confiscated his cell
      phone, claiming that it was "a gun," according to
      Rudkowski.

      The detective also snickered and "sang"tauntingly at
      Rudkowski, "Guess who's going to jail? Guess who's
      going to jail?"

      Luke was not arrested, but was detained for over an
      hour while police deliberated over whether take
      further action.

      The Face of IntimidationThe Face of Ridicule
      This officer makes equal attempts to intimidate and
      ridicule Rudkowski.

      Luke Rudkowski told the perpetrating policeman that
      his statements were "slanderous," denying ridiculous
      accusations that he was a terrorist.

      The officer again responded, "I saw wires. You look
      like a terrorist. I don't know what a terrorist looks
      like. You may be a terrorist for all I know...You've
      made threats; now I'm concerned."

      It is obvious from the recorded video that the
      demonstration was peaceful, no laws were broken and no
      threats were made. It is also clear that the reason he
      approached the group did not regard suspicion of
      threatening behavior, but to tell them that "Larry
      didn't want to hear it."

      The levels of betrayal against the First Amendment of
      the Constitution are so absurd and violate the basic
      tenants of original intent, they can only be compared
      with gross violations by the enforcement officers of
      the police state apparent, such as that with Abby
      Newman (as seen below, from 9/11: The Road to
      Tyranny). Egregious misinterpretation and abuse
      perpetrated by the very members of society supposedly
      in place to guarantee our freedoms.

      http://www.youtube.com/v/L_h_g0JtX4o

      Abby Newman was arrested for not showing ID in August
      2000 and fell victim to an illegal vehicle search in
      which police found items of subversive literature,
      including a "pocket Constitution."

      One officer asked the other "Is this legal?" (Case in
      point, where the very society of freedom is violated
      by the system that regulates that society.)

      But that has become all too common in the police
      state. A Christian group in Philadelphia was arrested
      in 2004 and charged with counts of criminal
      conspiracy, ethnic intimidation and riot for "praying,
      singing and reading scripture during an annual 'gay
      pride' event. Of course, the question here is not one
      of Christianity vs. homosexuality, but the criminal
      prosecution of free speech. The eroding inherent right
      threatens the freedom of Christians, homosexuals,
      pink-and-polka dotted people, and other groups who
      were previously guaranteed protection of their
      voices-- whether right or wrong, embarrassing, hateful
      or supportive, blasphemous, sinful or true.

      http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2004/161204readingbible.htm

      An attorney in Portland, Oregon was falsely arrested
      under anti-terrorism laws shortly after the 2004
      Madrid bombings.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/29/national/main2216468.shtml

      Even in Canada, where limitations such as "reasonable"
      are pitted against guarantees of free speech, people
      are granted 'fundamental freedoms' to "thought,
      belief, opinion and expression."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech#Canada

      Yet a protestor demonstrating outside the 2006
      Bilderberg conference in Ottawa, Don McCormick was
      kidnapped by an "Integrated National Security
      Enforcement Team" who detained him, kicked him and
      psychologically tortured him-- including threats that
      they would "cut off his arms."-- all this after being
      warned not to return to the protest the previous day.

      http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/290606kidnaptorture.htm

      Though McCormick was accused of "trying to blow up the
      Brookstreet Hotel"-- just as Rudkowski was accused of
      being a terrorist with a bomb-- he was guilty only of
      holding a picket sign and being critical of the
      secretive and manipulative group.

      Just as McCormick's free speech was violated,
      intimidated and labeled as terroristic at the behest
      and for the benefit of the Bilderberg group,
      Rudkowski's speech was threatened on behalf of Larry
      Silverstein-- who apparently wanted to silence discuss
      of 9/11 and WTC Building 7 through bullying threats.

      This is not Rudkowski's first encounter with
      harassment, intimidation and denials to the rights of
      free speech. During a speech by Zbigniew Brzezinski,
      security denied his free speech rights as a member of
      the press and attempted to confiscate his video tape,
      despite the fact that he declared his press position.
      Rudkowski serves as a free lance reporter for GCN
      Live! Radio (nationally-syndicated), and websites such
      as Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com, among others.

      http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/250407_brzezinski_911.html


      Recently the We Are Change group, which Rudkowski
      founded and remains involved in, was harassed by
      police outside ABC Studios during a peaceful
      demonstration of support for Rosie's public assertion
      of 9/11 Truth.

      http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/210307policeharass.htm

      Free speech is no longer guaranteed under the de facto
      shadow government that has hijacked the formerly
      legitimate government of this once great nation. In
      fact, the threats are widespread-- all the more so on
      the front lines 'who dare call it treason.'

      Luke Rudkowski can be contacted through
      WeAreChange.org. He has put out a call for legal
      defense-- Contact luke if you can provide legal aid or
      identify any of the officers in this video. Stand up
      to tyranny and criminal violations of basic, inherent
      rights.

      Aaron Dykes can be contacted at aaron@...
      =========================================================
      http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_aaron_dy_070428_ny_police_report_bom.htm

      ***

      April 28, 2007

      WTC Security Thugs Threaten to Falsely Report Bomb to
      Frame Activist as Terrorist
      By Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | April 27, 2007
      aaron@...

      "By the time the government finds out, you'll be in
      the hole thirty days" 9/11 Truther is Told By Officer
      Who Admits to False Accusation of Having a Bomb

      See video here:
      http://www.youtube.com/v/nYc2qQQfOXs

      Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | April 27, 2007

      Two persons identifying themselves as New York police
      officers interrupted a 9/11 Truth demonstration-- on a
      public sidewalk in front of the new WTC 7 Building--
      to intimidate free speech, stating "Larry
      [Silverstein] doesn't want to hear it," before
      accusing We Are Change founder Luke Rudkowski of
      having a bomb and that his cell phone was "a gun."

      http://www.wearechange.org
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.