Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Arcata resolution supports city residents

Expand Messages
    Fri, 04 Mar 2005 Andy Caffrey hayduke@efmedia.org Organization: EF! Media Arcata resolution supports city residents -- and the Constitution
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 4, 2005
      Fri, 04 Mar 2005
      Andy Caffrey
      Organization: EF! Media
      Arcata resolution supports city residents -- and the Constitution


      Friday, February 25, 2005
      My Word
      by Dave Meserve

      The proposed "Resolution Supporting Troops Who Refuse to Serve in
      Illegal Wars," currently being considered by the Arcata City Council,
      lays out a fully documented logical argument:

      1. The war against Iraq:

      a. violates Article I, section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which
      grants only to Congress the right to declare war.

      b. violates Article VI of the US Constitution, in that it violates
      ratified treaties, which have the status of the "supreme law of the

      2. Therefore it is an illegal war.

      3. Orders to serve in an illegal war are unlawful orders.

      4. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, armed forces members
      must obey only lawful orders.

      5. Therefore, enlisted city residents who choose to disobey orders
      when called upon to participate in the war against Iraq, or any
      illegal war, should have protection from prosecution, because they
      are in compliance with the law and the Constitution.

      If it adopts the resolution, the council will be protecting its
      enlisted citizens from forced participation in wars that violate the
      Constitution. These enlisted citizens may be our family members or
      our neighbors. If they consciously consent to serve in Iraq, then we
      will work for their safe and speedy return home (as we already have
      by passing Resolution 045-10, last July, demanding immediate
      withdrawal of all troops from Afghanistan and Iraq). If enlisted
      residents choose to refuse to serve in Iraq, or any illegal war, then
      we support their resistance and will endeavor to protect them from
      military prosecution for desertion or related crimes.

      What form of protection the city can provide is a subject for further
      discussion by the people of Arcata and the council at a future town
      hall meeting. Should we support those who refuse unlawful orders by
      connecting them with pro-bono legal support? Should we instruct our
      police, by ordinance, to disregard the enlistment status of any
      person they contact? Should we demand that our school board only
      allow military recruiters on our high school campus during career
      fairs, where non-military career options are also featured?

      Why is the council taking time discussing national issues instead of
      dealing with Arcata's pressing problems? The first fallacy included
      in this question is the word, "instead." All councilmembers work very
      hard to serve the people of Arcata. Almost all our work is on issues
      that everyone would agree are local: directing and supporting staff
      in maintaining and keeping our streets safe, providing affordable
      housing, developing good planning policies, providing good
      transportation, working toward a sustainable and healthier community,
      providing diverse recreational opportunities, maintaining fiscal
      responsibility and funding community projects.

      Most of this happens, not at council meetings, but in consultations
      with our staff and through our participation in regional
      organizations. If we then choose to spend some of our time on "larger
      issues," we have earned that right. Furthermore, like all enlisted
      military personnel, all elected officials take the same oath: to
      "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all
      enemies, foreign and domestic." It is the right and the sworn duty of
      the City Council to defend the Constitution and members of our
      community when they are threatened by the imperial ambitions of this,
      or any other, federal administration.

      Resolutions addressing the Iraq war certainly have national and
      international aspects, but they also have a strong local component.
      If the child of a local family joins the Army right out of high
      school, lured by the promise of a cash bonus and a free education,
      and if that young person is then ordered to serve in an
      unconstitutional war like the one in Iraq, that is profoundly local.
      And is it not a local issue if residents who are in the Reserves or
      the National Guard are called up to serve in Iraq? Who will coach the
      Little League team, or mow their lawn, or support their families on a
      reduced paycheck? One could argue that service in some wars is
      necessary for the defense of the nation, but clearly the Iraq war is
      both unnecessary and unconstitutional.

      Will our actions change U.S. policy? Not as long as it's just Arcata;
      but San Francisco plans to consider a similar resolution next month,
      and other cities are watching what happens here. The council is our
      smallest, most democratic and most accessible level of government.
      Historically, the American Revolution actually began years before
      1776, when small western Massachusetts towns ran the British out.
      City resolutions have had powerful effects on national policy in
      ending the Vietnam and Central American wars, controlling nuclear
      weapons and in opposing the USA Patriot Act.

      Is there a threat to Arcata businesses from a potential boycott? I
      think not. People visit here from around the world to see our
      redwoods and our coastline and to applaud Arcata, the little town
      that has consistently stood up for environmental, human and
      constitutional rights. We should be proud of that tradition and make
      sure that we continue it.

      Dave Meserve serves on the Arcata City Council.

      The opinions expressed in this My Word piece do not necessarily
      reflect the editorial viewpoint of the Times-Standard.


      Search /RENEGADE/ for articles that mention WAR -
      [only articles for the last six months will be indexed]

      /RENEGADE/ Search - GO TO: http://fornits.com/renegade/peaars.cgi?
      and just type in your topic. For differing results you may uncheck
      "article" and search on just "subject," etc. /RENEGADE/ also has
      "time-frame" in the search, so you can tailor your results that way, too.



      *STRIDER* Sector Air Raid Warden at /RENEGADE/

      Home: http://fornits.com/renegade/

      Articles posted in the last 10 days:

      Blog: http://striders-renegade.blogspot.com/

      Bay_Area_Activist list ----
      Membership by invitation only - moderated / archives for members only
      Contact bay_area_activist-owner@yahoogroups.com
      <mailto:bay_area_activist-owner@yahoogroups.com> to request

      EF! list ---------------
      earthfirstalert - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/earthfirstalert
      List-Subscribe: <mailto:earthfirstalert-subscribe@yahoogroups.com>

      usenet: news:misc.activism.progressive
      e-mail: mailto:strider@...

      No War! No Nukes! Impeach! SOS!

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.